In the world of rights or perceived rights, there are effectively two kinds of rights.
Negative Rights are rights which exist and are manifested without being dependent upon the input of another person or agency. The right to religious freedom is one such example. You are free to worship as you see fit, even inventing a faith such as the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or Scientology or the LDS Church, to list 3 religions invented in the US in its 200+ year history. The right to free speech is another. The right to bear arms and defend one's self.
Positive Rights are rights that require the additional input of another person or agency. The right to education requires input from taxpayers, in order to fund teachers. It requires the potential use of Eminent Domain to seize land if none is available for constructing schools. It requires the employment of teachers under a noncompetitive monopolistic employment scheme that could arguably be said to suppress wages for that particular career. The right to food, shelter, or health care would be another such subset of examples.
Most conservatives and libertarians eschew the notion of Positive Rights, since their support is tantamount to slavery of the person/agency providing the service to the right claimer.
As such... where does voting stand as a right? Do you have a right to vote? Is it a negative or a positive right?
My thinking is that voting is a Positive Right, and as such, effectively negated as a right at all. At the individual level, voting merely involves walking into a polling place and selecting one's preference for an act of governance or a candidate for an office. But the mechanisms that manifest that individual's vote are dependent upon the input of considerable amounts of other people and agencies. Millions of ballots have to be printed, and/or computer software written to (accurately?) reflect the vote. Polling places must be distributed based on population density and proximity. Ballots must be distributed to those polling places, or tens of thousands of computers distributed. Some semblance of authority is bestowed upon particular poll workers in order to maintain order at the polling place. Voter registration efforts are aggregated at the Secretary of State level in most States in order to create precinct voter registration lists. Votes are tallied digitally via the computer programs or paper ballots are scanned or hand counted, by poll workers. Poll workers are generally volunteers and there is no individual right to their labor. They are not an elected office of themselves.
In the event there were no poll worker volunteers, a right to vote is null.
How would an election be conducted if there were no volunteers? Is this a "mobilize the National Guard" event? US Army? Re-task local police forces to run polls?
Ultimately, the "right to vote" appears to me to be a collective right rather than an individual one, dependent upon the forbearance of one's neighbors to agree to operate the polls. Which brings us to this election's messy issue. Do you have a right to a fair vote, if the poll volunteers don't want it to be fair?