https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/christine-blasey-ford-psychologist/
Sounds like dangerous.com could have done a better job of fact-checking.
That, or Snopes isn't exactly objective and unbiased.
The California law on the use of the title "psychologist" isn't unlike the law in my state and California regarding the use of the title "architect." I'm a licensed architect in my home state. Although I used to be licensed in California, I dropped that a number of years ago because I wasn't using it, and they adopted a continuing education requirement that would have required me to travel to California to take classes every year -- even though I more than satisfy my own state's requirement, California doesn't recognize the classes I take here.
I can legally call an architect in my state, but I can't in California even though I am licensed here, unless I include the disclaimer that I'm a [state] architect.
I wouldn't say Ford committed perjury, but I would say she engaged in a bit of professional exaggeration. And the bit about tossing out professional/clinical jargon (leading one new source to describe her as providing her own expert witness) such as talking about memory being embedded in the hippocampus was pure manipulation. Memory isn't her specialty or her area of research, but by using such technical terminology she conveyed an impression that she is an expert in memory.