I got the answers.
Then removed myself from his mailing list.
But not before sending in a strongly worded responce. I hope it actually gets read. Doubtfull but cathardic.
Glaring bad joo joo's:
#5. He says close non dominate eye. For shooting pistols in defensive training.
#6 He's selling his "three secrets". Yeah, because practice does not make perfect.
#7. All of above. I'm sorry, but how the *expletive deleted*ck does the fact that you are armed prevent you from having to deal with a situation where you must protect yourself with violent force? I mean sure, it comes in handy when you need to defend yourself, but it doesn't project a magic force feild preventing anyone from attacking you. (this one doesn't even deserve rolling eyes. It's too stupid)
#10. I put shoot to stop, because training for specifics is no no in my book. Pincus (who I really, really like) says train for all circumstances and don't lock yourself down to one, two, three, or one stance or one anything if it could vary in a critical situation (or whatever he calls it) which makes a hell of a lot sense to me.
I also don't like 4. I didn't like the question in the first place, and I really dislike his assumption that it's the always the shooter. My answer to that question is kentucky windage, but since that wasn't an option, I went with adjust sights. It's just another marketing tool.
1, 2, 3, 8, and 9 usually come down to personal preference and while there are some choices are better then others, it varies.
It's bs selling to suckers and makes us look bad.