Regardless of where you stand on abortion, every law I've ever seen on it, including Ohio's 6 week ban, has exceptions for endangering the life or health of the mother. I asked 4 separate healthcare professionals I know and they all said 10 YO's body is almost certainly not through puberty enough to safely carry a baby to term and give birth. I don't believe that there wasn't a Dr. in Ohio that felt that way and would have legally terminated this pregnancy.
If that story's not completely made up propaganda, it's being purposely twisted to hit emotions.
Just to be able to get pregnant at 10 the girl has probably experienced precocious puberty. World record for youngest girl to give live birth was a 5 or 6 year old in Peru in the 1930’s (my recollection was that poor kid got her period before turning 1, a pretty extreme case of precocious puberty). So, while certainly high risk, it’s not impossible for a 10 year old to carry a pregnancy at least to viability. Full term might not be advisable, but 25-30 weeks is likely feasible. From a pro-life perspective that’s a situation that would require a lot of medical monitoring, and otherwise treating it like any high risk pregnancy. And in the event that she couldn’t survive to carry to viability then any treatment necessary should be done to preserve her life. Most likely the child would wind up being raised by someone other than the birth mother as she won’t have the maturity to handle that, even if her body could sustain a pregnancy until viability.
That said, there’s also zero chance of legal consent to sexual activity at that age. So at a bare minimum, assuming it’s not entirely made up propaganda, she’s a victim of rape, and typically in these cases also incest.