Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: Perd Hapley on November 15, 2015, 11:49:37 PM

Title: 65% increase in gun licenses in Massachusetts
Post by: Perd Hapley on November 15, 2015, 11:49:37 PM

A data point in the discussion of whether or not gun ownership is declining:

http://wwlp.com/2015/11/10/i-team-guns-licenses-jump-by-66-in-massachusetts/

Title: Re: 65% increase in gun licenses in Massachusetts
Post by: Devonai on November 16, 2015, 06:48:43 AM

I gave up my non-resident LTC years ago because it was too expensive to maintain ($100/year last I checked). Now if I'm traveling through Mass I lock everything in the trunk and drive 65 in the right lane.

Title: Re: 65% increase in gun licenses in Massachusetts
Post by: Hawkmoon on November 16, 2015, 10:23:53 AM

Quote from: Devonai on November 16, 2015, 06:48:43 AM

I gave up my non-resident LTC years ago because it was too expensive to maintain ($100/year last I checked). Now if I'm traveling through Mass I lock everything in the trunk and drive 65 in the right lane.

True. It's actually much easier for a non-resident to get an unrestricted license for Massachusetts than it is for a resident, but "Taxachusetts" makes the non-residents pay dearly. The non-resident licenses are only valid for one year, while resident licenses are good for six years. The cost is $100 -- for six years if you're a resident, for ONE year if you're a non-resident.

Title: Re: 65% increase in gun licenses in Massachusetts
Post by: Devonai on November 16, 2015, 05:29:01 PM

Ayuh.  If I lived ten miles to the north in Sproingfeld it would be cheaper for me to maintain both CT and NH non-resident permits.  But car insurance in MA is a hot mess (SWMBO does claims for a living and I was a MA resident for six years).  Taxes in CT are comparable but I'd rather not have to deal with MA car insurance ever again.

Oh, and if I was a MA resident again I'd at least be able to load my "pre-ban" mags to full capacity.  ;/