Author Topic: Japanese Surrender!  (Read 5684 times)

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Japanese Surrender!
« on: March 29, 2010, 09:24:49 AM »
Avoid cliches like the plague!

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2010, 07:02:33 PM »
i was wondering if they found another hold out in the jungle
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,436
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2010, 10:01:05 PM »
Missouri:  the state so hard-core, you just put our name on your ship and watch the enemy come crawling in to surrender.   :cool:
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2010, 10:43:42 PM »
Missouri:  the state so hard-core, you just put our name on your ship and watch the enemy come crawling in to surrender.   :cool:

the thought that a shell the size of a volkwagon is next encourages good behavior
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,436
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2010, 11:07:28 PM »
No, it was the name, I tell you.  

You only say that because you're half one-of-them.   :P   :lol:
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2010, 11:13:31 PM »
just don't send a flying volkswagon this way !please!  mr fistful! >:D


though the irish 1/2 wants to say take your wee gun and be damned [popcorn]
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

sanglant

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,475
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2010, 11:16:34 PM »
wee light gun? =D

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,436
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #7 on: March 29, 2010, 11:40:33 PM »
My Irish half wants to deck your Irish half, and then have a pint with it. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2010, 11:41:16 PM »
typical irishman
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,436
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2010, 11:50:14 PM »
Irishman?!  Irishman?  That's person of Irish descent, thank you very much!  You have made me very angry!  Stereotypically angry!
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2010, 11:51:48 PM »
hey of the eight or so names i know thats the most respectful one!
  you ever seen the movie the commitments?  and what the guy describes the irish role in europe as?
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,436
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2010, 01:10:12 AM »
Huh? 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Regolith

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,171
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2010, 02:25:39 AM »
The USS Nevada was more badass.

USS Nevada (BB-36), the second United States Navy ship to be named after the 36th state, was the lead ship of her class of two battleships; her sister ship was Oklahoma. Launched in 1914, Nevada was a leap forward in dreadnought technology; three of her new features would be included on almost every subsequent US battleship: gun turrets with three guns,[A 3] oil in place of coal for fuel, and the "all or nothing" armor principle. These features made Nevada the first US Navy "super-dreadnought".

Nevada served in both World Wars: during the last few months of World War I, Nevada was based in Bantry Bay, Ireland, to protect the supply convoys that were sailing to and from Great Britain. In World War II, she was one of the battleships trapped when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. She was the only battleship to get underway during the attack, making the ship "the only bright spot in an otherwise dismal and depressing morning" for the United States.[12] Still, she was hit by one torpedo and at least six bombs while steaming away from Battleship Row, forcing her to be beached. Subsequently salvaged and modernized at Puget Sound Navy Yard, Nevada served as a convoy escort in the Atlantic and as a fire-support ship in four amphibious assaults: the Normandy Landings and the invasions of Southern France, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa.

At the end of World War II, the Navy decided that Nevada was too old to be retained, so they assigned her to be a target ship in the atomic experiments that were going to be conducted at Bikini Atoll in July 1946 (Operation Crossroads). After being hit by two atomic bombs, she was still afloat but heavily damaged and radioactive. She was decommissioned on 29 August 1946 and sunk during naval gunfire practice on 31 July 1948.

tl;dr version:  It was the only battleship to get underway during the attack of Pearl Harbor, survived a torpedo hit and six bombs, was repaired and served throughout World War II (and was at Iwo Jima, the Normandy Invasion, and Okinawa), then survived being hit by two nuclear bombs.

It was the Jack Bauer of battleships.  Chuck Norris was afraid of it.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. - Thomas Jefferson

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt the Younger

Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything. - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth

kgbsquirrel

  • APS Photoshop God
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,466
  • Bill, slayer of threads.
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2010, 02:50:27 AM »
Bah, if you want most badass ship of WW2, that would have to go to the Enterprise CV-6. That ship was awarded 20 out of the 21 battle stars for WW2. For you land lubbers, that means that ship was at 20 of the 21 major naval engagements during the entire war, both Atlantic and Pacific. Then there's always the Constitution with her perfect battle record; 31 engagements and 31 victories.


But yeah, it was scary what those old war wagons could soak up. The Pennsylvania was also used at the Trinity tests. 2 nukes and she only had "minor fire damage to the super structure." They towed her over to another atoll and studied her for another two years before taking her out and scuttling her. You know they are built diehard tough when even atomic bomb isn't a sure kill, let alone two.  =D


And a bit on topic: Thanks for posting that clip. Very neat stuff.

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #14 on: March 30, 2010, 08:27:20 AM »
What I like is the destroyer that brought the Japanese up alongside the Missouri. The USS Buchanan. The ships named Buchanan all have interesting histories as well. The DD Buchanan in WWII was the 2nd of three. It's claim to fame would be that of transporting the Japanese, which I was unaware of until I saw the clip.

The first Buchanan WWI was "lent" to the British at the outset of WWII and they proceeded to turn it into a giant ramming bomb with which to destroy the drydock doors at St Nazaire France. If you've never read the story of the raid on St Nazaire I highly recommend it. Those guys had testicles that clanked when they walked. :O

The raid put the only drydock big enough in Europe to handle the German battleships out of commission for the duration of the war. This led to the Germans tending to want to keep their battleships up north where the only other drydock big enough to handle them was located. Smart move on the Brits part. Some of the raid party were Scots and they went in wearing kilts.

Anyhoo, I served on the third Buchanan. It's main claim to fame would be that it was one of the ships involved in a little skirmish called the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. It was used as a target quite a few years ago now and it took several rockets and a 2000 lb laser guided bomb and remained afloat. The torpedo that was supposed to take it out failed to detonate. This was on June 13th. On the 14th they sent a demo crew on board and scuttled it with explosives. Strangely enough her hull number was 14, so there are those that believe she simply refused to go down on the 13th because she prefered the 14th.  :lol:

The Buchanan line was named after a Civil War Confederate officer. It was the only surface ship in the US Navy named after a Confederate. Last I heard, and due of course to the art of being politically correct, there are no plans to name another ship Buchanan.

And you're welcome, I posted them cause I thought they was neat. ;)
« Last Edit: March 30, 2010, 08:32:39 AM by 280plus »
Avoid cliches like the plague!

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2010, 08:37:57 AM »
A little side note. When I learned the Buch was going to be used as a target I emailed my old XO who at that point happened to be COMNAVSURFPAC or Commander of the whole goddamn Pacific Surface Fleet. Three stars. I asked him to hit it with something big for me. So to this day I claim the 2000 lb GBU as being MY BOMB!  >:D
Avoid cliches like the plague!

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,652
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2010, 09:12:10 AM »
When done right, those old ships could soak up a lot of damage . . . a couple of terrorists in a rubber boat wouldn't have done much to one of those old battlewagons the same way they did to the USS Cole. (OK, OK, battleship vs. destroyer, there IS a difference.)

When done wrong, well, they weren't invulnerable, and could fail spectacularly. (Consider the Hood.)

Getting back to the topic of the original post - the Jap surrender . . .

Among my late father's effects is a photo album that includes pictures of a couple of white-painted Jap Betty bombers sitting on an airfield. While en-route to arrange the formal surrender, the Jap emissaries landed their aircraft on the island of Ie Shima, where my Dad's outfit, the 3rd Air Commando Group, was stationed at the time. So he took a number of photos.

I'll have to search through the negatives and see if he got any pictures of the Japs themselves . . .
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #17 on: March 30, 2010, 09:39:39 AM »
I'm thinking, from what I saw of the Cole damage, that the newer larger destroyers like Cole didn't have quite the armor around the engineering spaces like my 1963 built destroyer. We had at least 3" around those and the magazines may have had even more. I can't see them punching through 3" with a boat bomb unless it's shaped or drives a projectile to punch through with. The rest of it was built to suit its nickname "tin can", or nowadays, aluminum can.  :laugh:

Everything from the main deck up on mine was aluminum plate. My bomb took that all off down to at least the O-1 level which is the first deck above the main deck. IIRC the bridge was O-5. One rocket looks like it probably skipped off my rack near the forward gun mount and another completely tore the "roof" off of my steering gear and after generator spaces.

here you go... where you see the bow all torn up, yea, that was the TV dammit.  :lol:

My rack was on that side (port) right across from the gun mount. Where you see the square decking torn off the stern, yup after generator and after steering. My other onboard home. My survival chances in either area, as seen in this new light? Yup, zip.

She took a rocket hit while on the gunline in VN, killed the ship's barber.  =(

http://sinkex.uss-buchanan-ddg14.org/
Avoid cliches like the plague!

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #18 on: March 30, 2010, 03:26:22 PM »
Quote
The Buchanan line was named after a Civil War Confederate officer. It was the only surface ship in the US Navy named after a Confederate. Last I heard, and due of course to the art of being politically correct, there are no plans to name another ship Buchanan.

And Buchanan is a fine Scots name, too  =)
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,195
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2010, 03:47:38 PM »
I'm thinking, from what I saw of the Cole damage, that the newer larger destroyers like Cole didn't have quite the armor around the engineering spaces like my 1963 built destroyer. We had at least 3" around those and the magazines may have had even more. I can't see them punching through 3" with a boat bomb unless it's shaped or drives a projectile to punch through with. The rest of it was built to suit its nickname "tin can", or nowadays, aluminum can.  :laugh:

Everything from the main deck up on mine was aluminum plate. My bomb took that all off down to at least the O-1 level which is the first deck above the main deck. IIRC the bridge was O-5. One rocket looks like it probably skipped off my rack near the forward gun mount and another completely tore the "roof" off of my steering gear and after generator spaces.

here you go... where you see the bow all torn up, yea, that was the TV dammit.  :lol:

My rack was on that side (port) right across from the gun mount. Where you see the square decking torn off the stern, yup after generator and after steering. My other onboard home. My survival chances in either area, as seen in this new light? Yup, zip.

She took a rocket hit while on the gunline in VN, killed the ship's barber.  =(

http://sinkex.uss-buchanan-ddg14.org/

They are not armored much anymore is true, kinda pointless when an Exocet can go pretty much in one side and out the other. The super-structure of the Burke class is steel though, lesson learned with the Stark missile attack and the Belknap at sea collision. Aluminum superstructures tend to burn until they get to something that is not. Amazingly enough that ship got re-built and continued to serve. Neat site I found that pic on, unaware of the USS Franklin story. Another good one is the Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58), no reason that ship shouldn't have sunk. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Samuel_B._Roberts_(FFG-58)

Pic of the Belknap after its collision with CV-67 and subsequent fire triggered by ruptured JP-5 lines in the carrier's deck overhang dumping fuel down the Belknap's stacks. Yay for melting aluminum!
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

kgbsquirrel

  • APS Photoshop God
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,466
  • Bill, slayer of threads.
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #20 on: March 30, 2010, 04:24:07 PM »
They are not armored much anymore is true, kinda pointless when an Exocet can go pretty much in one side and out the other. The super-structure of the Burke class is steel though, lesson learned with the Stark missile attack and the Belknap at sea collision. Aluminum superstructures tend to burn until they get to something that is not.

Yeah, burning aluminum is bad ju-ju. After those incidents and watching what happened in the Falklands War we went back to an all steel Navy PDQ. I was reading a thesis on bringing back the battlewagons a couple years ago (let me see if I can dig it up), very in depth analysis of the whole situation. He even did a potential damage assessment regarding exocet missiles and other threats.

Here it is: Does the Past Have a Place in the Future? The Utility of Battleships in the Twenty First Century by LCDR L. Bruce Van Dam

ETA: If the link doesn't work (it wasn't a minute ago) try copy pasting it directly: http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA367903&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
« Last Edit: March 30, 2010, 07:01:17 PM by kgbsquirrel »

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2010, 06:50:30 PM »
Dam!  :lol:

Yup, clearly thin skin around the engines now, looking at the Roberts pics. I believe a reason for the armor vs no armor is it's not nearly as devastating for a couple of gas turbines to take a hit than an operating 1200 psi superheated steam plant which would most likely end in a catastrophic explosion. I imagine the weight was also an factor. Less armor means lighter and more manuverable.

yes, I was in Repair 5 for GQ. Repair 5 was damage control for the engineering spaces and mustered on the messdecks which was directly above. We were surrounded by aluminum which we were well aware wouldn't even slow a .50 BMG down on the way through. I often wondered how much use we'd be if'n we were suddenly all dead.  ;/
Avoid cliches like the plague!

kgbsquirrel

  • APS Photoshop God
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,466
  • Bill, slayer of threads.
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2010, 07:23:51 PM »
...I believe a reason for the armor vs no armor is it's not nearly as devastating for a couple of gas turbines to take a hit than an operating 1200 psi superheated steam plant which would most likely end in a catastrophic explosion. I imagine the weight was also an factor. Less armor means lighter and more manuverable.

The "all or nothing" armor scheme was devised long before the advent of gas turbines and pretty much for the second reason you postulated. It was pretty much deemed that if you couldn't put enough armor in place to absolutely to prevent the expected threat from causing grievous harm, why waste the tonnage on the armor when you could put it to better use elsewhere, ie. improved propulsion or additional weapons. This scheme first saw use in the US Navy around 1912 with the construction of the Nevada-class battleships.

Today the Navy has largely moved away from passive defense in preference for actively stopping threats before they contact the ship. This is seen with CIWS, RAM, and one of my personal favorites, the former AIM-7 Sparrow which has been turned into a surface launched version (Sea Sparrow) that can engage both air and surface targets (how's that for a multi-role platform?) A few passive measures are still employed today but they are largely limited to enhanced compartmentalization and a few inches of kevlar in key locations, nothing like the eighteen inches of homogeneous armor plate that was used on the conning tower of the Iowa's (for reference, an Exocet has an armor penetration of only 7 to 10 inches of RHA.)

Oh, and yes, if the Cole bombing had been attempted on an Iowa it would have gotten no where. The Iowa's were designed to withstand multiple 700lb TNT warhead contact detonating torpedoes. They were designed with three large liquid filled voids (DFM, feed water and potable water) that were themselves compartmentalized with 1 inch steel bulkheads between each providing a 20 foot buffer before you even reached the inner citadel where the 12" thick class A armored belt was located. There is a reason Iran got really quiet when we sent the Wisconsin and Missouri into the gulf back in 1988. They simply couldn't do dick to those ships and they knew it. It is my not quite humble opinion that the Admiralty dropped the ball when they struck these beasts from the roster in favor of under armored and under armed 1 billion dollar a copy destroyers.

*puts away the soap box* Sorry for the derail.

PTK

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,318
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2010, 07:26:01 PM »
Quote
There is a reason Iran got really quiet when we sent the Wisconsin and Missouri into the gulf back in 1988. They simply couldn't do dick to those ships and they knew it.

 :laugh:
"Only lucky people grow old." - Frederick L.
September 1915 - August 2008

"If you really do have cancer "this time", then this is your own fault. Like the little boy who cried wolf."

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: Japanese Surrender!
« Reply #24 on: March 30, 2010, 07:48:05 PM »
Having never really looked into how those things were built all I can say is holy crap!

How effective is the new active stuff at stopping the various missles these days? Or even a 3" shell for example? I hope they at least put some heavier stuff around the magazines.  :O
Avoid cliches like the plague!