Author Topic: the pen is mightier than the sword (at least it has the same criminal charge)  (Read 1728 times)

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/04/nutley_woman_is_stabbed_in_fac.html

on the subway a NJ woman asks a homeless man to not light his cigarette, and ends up being stabbed in the face with a pen.  i don't have any sympathy for him, but the police charge him with felony assault, and CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON!
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 04:02:41 PM by geronimotwo »
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

birdman

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,831
Friend of a friend was charged with assault with a deadly weapon once, the weapon in question was a can of frozen OJ. 

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
it became a weapon when he used it as one
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
i understand an assault charge, but criminal possession implies that it was illegal for him to carry a pen.  my thoughts are that if it is illegal for him to carry the weapon before the assault (ie an unlicensed handgun in ny, or a knife with an illegal blade length), then criminal possession sticks. but how would it be criminal for him to be carrying a pen?
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 06:15:16 PM by geronimotwo »
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,690
I'd make a lousy juror in these cases . . . if the authorities pile on with asinine charges and insist on prosecuting them in court, I'd be inclined to disbelieve testimony about the legitimate offenses the accused may have committed.
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

Matthew Carberry

  • Formerly carebear
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,281
  • Fiat justitia, pereat mundus
Up here it would be assault with a "dangerous instrument"

Quote
(a) A person commits the crime of assault in the first degree if

(1) that person recklessly causes serious physical injury to another by means of a dangerous instrument;


(15) "dangerous instrument" means

(A) any deadly weapon or anything that, under the circumstances in which it is used, attempted to be used, or threatened to be used, is capable of causing death or serious physical injury; or

(B) hands or other objects when used to impede normal breathing or circulation of blood by applying pressure on the throat or neck or obstructing the nose or mouth;

We don't have many possession charges, certainly none for things that "could" be used as a weapon (but are otherwise not weapons), most of our crimes require action with intent.

Maybe the prosecution thinks they can prove that he had the pen with the intent of using it as a weapon?

Like, he engraved it with the name "Mr. Stabby" and carried it in a case labeled "Open only in case of stabbing opportunity"?
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 04:57:24 PM by Matthew Carberry »
"Not all unwise laws are unconstitutional laws, even where constitutional rights are potentially involved." - Eugene Volokh

"As for affecting your movement, your Rascal should be able to achieve the the same speeds no matter what holster rig you are wearing."

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
wanna see a pencil disappear?
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

TommyGunn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,956
  • Stuck in full auto since birth.
i understand an assault charge, but criminal possession implies that it was illegal for him to carry a pen.  my thoughts are that if it is illegal for him to carry the weapon before the assault (ie an unlicensed handgun in ny, or a knife with an illegal blade length), then criminal possession sticks. but how would it be criminal for him to be carrying a pen?
There are things called "field expedient weapons."   Usually this is more a military track of thought, but a lot of things which have innocent purposes when used as a manufacturer intended are not weapons in that capacity.  Like the pen in question.  A brick might also be used as a f.e.w. to clobber someone with.  As to its legality, that depends upon context.  You can't just clobber someone who asks you not to smoke.  IT would also have been illegal for that guy to punch the woman with his fist .... but having a hand at the end of one's arm is not illegal.  Neither is having a pen.
Some things, such as knives and guns, are more obviously purposefully constructed as weapons it would be difficult to consider them as something other than weapons ..... even by politicians who make laws and are usually quite adept at twisting semantics into a knot.
MOLON LABE   "Through ignorance of what is good and what is bad, the life of men is greatly perplexed." ~~ Cicero

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,933
  • ...shall not be allowed.
A "now-it-can-be-told" longecdote.

Tommy Gunn pointed out:

Quote
There are things called "field expedient weapons."   Usually this is more a military track of thought, but a lot of things which have innocent purposes when used as a manufacturer intended are not weapons in that capacity.  Like the pen in question.  A brick might also be used as a f.e.w. to clobber someone with.  As to its legality, that depends upon context.  You can't just clobber someone who asks you not to smoke.  IT would also have been illegal for that guy to punch the woman with his fist .... but having a hand at the end of one's arm is not illegal.  Neither is having a pen.
Some things, such as knives and guns, are more obviously purposefully constructed as weapons it would be difficult to consider them as something other than weapons ..... even by politicians who make laws and are usually quite adept at twisting semantics into a knot.

For a time I was interested in finding out about using ordinary items as self-defense weapons in an emergency, such as you describe as "field-expedient" weapons.  Now in my case you gotta understand that I worked in a tightly-controlled "no weapons" environment --xrays, magnetometers, armed guards, and all like that there. 

One of the frequently mentioned field expedient weapons  --or more correctly, "office-expedient" --were pens (and pencils and letter openers, and high-heeled shoes, and key rings) and in my research, several suggestions were made as to the best pens to use as weapons --apparently some pens look like they were almost designed to be effective as weapons.

So anyhow, to make a long story longer, the outfit I worked for had regular general staff meetings where, among the other items on the agenda, was the distribution of little "presents" to all the staff.  One time it was a high-quality umbrella, another time it was one of those picture boxes where you could install you own pix and have it "slide show" through your pictures while it was sitting on your desk... goodies like that.

One day they distributed high quality pens in fine, high-quality presentation boxes.  When I got mine, I opened it up to see that this here, now, "pen," duplicated all the characteristics of the "pens" I had seen previously discussed as potential weapons.

This pen weighed almost two ounces, was over a half inch in diameter, had a non-retractible very fine point, and when you took off the cap and put it on the back, it made a really fine stabbing implement.  The top of the cap was perfectly suited for your thumb to take up the thrust of a stab.

So I was sitting next to a fellow gunny and I held the pen up a little and looked at him with a mock-shock look and made subtle stabbing motions with it, and he looked back at me and nodded, grinning knowingly.

After the meeting we talked about it a little, and his comment was something like "it beats carrying a big rock around."

I thought about it some more, and besides having that "pen" around all the time, I started a rock collection for my office, all set up for display on one of my shelves.

One of those rocks weighed about a pound and a half and had a  smoothly-rounded pointy end on it.

So now I'm retired and I can finally tell you about The Pen and The Rock.

Terry, 230RN
« Last Edit: April 25, 2011, 02:16:13 PM by 230RN »
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

Matthew Carberry

  • Formerly carebear
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,281
  • Fiat justitia, pereat mundus
Ironically, only one of those beats paper.  =D
"Not all unwise laws are unconstitutional laws, even where constitutional rights are potentially involved." - Eugene Volokh

"As for affecting your movement, your Rascal should be able to achieve the the same speeds no matter what holster rig you are wearing."

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,933
  • ...shall not be allowed.
^  Verrry good!

And parenthetically, the pretty box the pen came in held a Ruger MKII magazine nicely.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2011, 01:32:19 PM by 230RN »
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.