CSD:
Do you read the examples you cite in your posts?
I wonder, because the majority of them consist of agents of the gov't doing wrong, abusing their authority while taking the taxpayers' dollars. (state gov't engineers, teachers, .mil). Not the sort of thing to bolster your argument, such as it is.
You also might recall a thread we had a while back where a teacher who had sex with their student and fellow teachers rallied to his or her defense. The general consensus was not charitably disposed toward those teachers. So, no, it doesn't look like APS lets them off the hook, either.
And then there is the gross category error, conflating ethical & moral lapses with illegal acts as well as not understanding the relationship involved between occupation and questionable action(1).
I am not sure what you are trying to argue, but you have effectively argued "Agents of the state have too much authority, abuse it on a regular basis, and ought to be shorn of much of their authority & held accountable." Your posts in this thread seem analogous to the Zimmerman prosecution where they were unable to convict Zimmerman of murder, but it sure seems they convicted Martin of assault.
(1) "LEOs who break the law ~! Doctors who work while inebriated." Something like "LEOs who break the law ~ Doctors who deliberately infect patients" or "LEOs who break the law ~ Nurses who inject patients with poison" would be closer.
