Here comes China ..
there goes NATOThe United States will cease to be the lone superpower within thirteen years, and both the European Union and Britain will have to accept that the transatlantic strategic partnership will no longer work
We now see Prof. Victor Bulmer-Thomas, director of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (parent to the "our" Council on Foreign Relations) breaking the bad news; China is going to be a superpower (not news to me and many others even ten years ago). And whoops; this is going to change
our relationship with Europa and "the [NATO] will no longer work".
I like the way the EU and Britain are addressed separately here - as if London is some latecomer to the eurostate
The EU has had it's own plans for a military force since inception, and developement of this has been going on steadily under the public radar here at home of the
Eurocorps. I have been following this for a number of years now and bring it up every now and then on a forum or two:
http://www.eurocorps.org/Another one those significant subjects that CNN and FOX will report on one day down the road and present it as if it
has just suddenly happened - something "new".......
--------------------------------------
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Walker_World_Here_Comes_China_Warns_UK_999.htmlWalker's World: Here Comes China, Warns U.K.
Prof. Victor Bulmer-Thomas, director of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
by Martin Walker
UPI Editor Emeritus
London (UPI) Dec 18, 2006
The United States will cease to be the lone superpower within thirteen years, and both the European Union and Britain will have to accept that the transatlantic strategic partnership will no longer work. This is the shock prediction of one of the top figures of the British foreign policy establishment.
In his farewell address as director of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, known as Chatham House after its prestigious address in London's plush St. James district, Prof. Victor Bulmer-Thomas said that the swift emergence of China as the second megapower would transform the world's strategic map.
"Just as the world is currently shaped to a large extent by the international priorities of the United States, so it will be shaped to a significant degree by the international priorities of the two megapowers in 2020," he told a blue ribbon audience of British officials and politicians and international diplomats.
China will also seek to curb and to reduce American influence in the Asia-Pacific region, he predicted, using all available non-military tools such as trade deals, soft loans, and strategic investments. He also expected China to demonstrate "a more aggressive approach to the Taiwan issue."
"A period of strategic rivalry between the United States and China while this process is underway can be confidently predicted. However, this is not likely to lead to open conflict," he stressed. "The economic ties between the two countries will be close and each country will have a strong stake in the economic success of the other. There will also be areas of cooperation, notably in tackling proliferation as well as developing and transferring technology to combat greenhouse gas emissions. Yet it is unrealistic to imagine that the United States will not resist strongly the erosion of its privileged status -- particularly when the new megapower is so fundamentally opposed to U.S. values in religion and personal freedom."
Prof. Bulmer-Thomas' prediction that Britain and Europe would have to reconsider their traditional ties to the United States have caused a flurry of concern and speculation in European diplomatic circles, which are still digesting the imminent end of Prime Minister Tony Blair's political career after the Iraq misadventure.
"Both the U.K. and the EU have to recognize that the old idea of a strategic partnership with the United States -- or special relationship in the case of the U.K. -- to solve global problems will not work in a world of two megapowers. It may still be true that most global problems will not have a solution without the United States, but that will also be true of China. A strategic partnership with the United States that ignores China will not be effective, but a strategic partnership with both countries is unrealistic," the Chatham House director added.
Bulmer-Thomas, who has run Chatham House for the past five years and whose tenure was shaped by the 9/11 terrorist attack and its aftermath, warned that the recent American primacy would no longer be tenable. He said that U.S. indebtedness and low savings rate would erode its economic position, and "the long-term liabilities in health spending and social security will make it very difficult for the U.S. to match the growth of the world economy, leading to a decline in its global share of GDP."
So while the United States would remain the world's largest economy in dollar terms it would probably be matched or overtaken by China as a trading nation, and in GDP as measured by purchasing power parity. The United States would probably keep its military and technological lead with an annual defense budget of over $700 billion, and would remain a megapower in 2020. However, if China continues the double-digit annual growth in its defense budget it will be spending some $400 billion a year by 2020, double the European defense spending and four times as much as Russia.
But the United States has been damaged psychologically by the recent setbacks in Iraq. One key component of superpower status is public and political support for the investment of the resources required to sustain that position, and that is now in question. The U.S. belief in itself and its special role "has been sharply eroded as a result of the war in Iraq and other related policies such as the abuse of prisoners in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.
"There is no doubt that self-belief has taken a sharp knock under the Bush presidency and the traumas of Iraq and Afghanistan will weigh heavily on the U.S. electorate for several years yet. The notion of the United States as 'a force for good in the world' will not be as widely accepted as before. Isolation is not an option for the United States, but a more neo-realist approach to international affairs certainly is," he noted.
China by contrast has abundant belief in itself and its own special role in the world, and is fast acquiring the financial resources to match the United States as a megapower. China will soon be the world's largest holder of foreign exchange reserves, he predicted, and "will strenuously seek to convert a significant part of its international financial assets into real assets though strategic overseas purchases. This will give it a global presence and the book value of Chinese inward investment will exceed that of most other countries in those developing countries that allow foreign investment access to natural resources."
China will grow dramatically in global strategic reach and political power, and will add to its current veto in the United Nations Security Council with a bigger share of votes in those international organizations like the International Monetary Fund and World Bank where voting is determined by economic weight. By 2020 it will have developed "a range of public policy instruments to promote its national interests and these will include sticks as well as carrots. As the largest importer in the world, China will have immense leverage over those countries or regions interested in signing Preferential Trade Agreements. At the same time, China will not hesitate to use sticks to achieve its interests."
Europe would have to adjust to these new realities, he went on, and learn to coordinate its international policies accordingly to defend its own interests, since neither the United States nor China, engaged in their rivalry, are likely to seek to strengthen international institutions or the United Nations.
"The EU has to speak with one voice in international forums and that requires a change in past practice by Britain and other member states," he urged. "The obvious starting point is the International Financial Institutions, where the multiplicity of EU votes needs to be replaced by a single EU representative. This will be very painful for the United Kingdom, but there is really no choice unless we are prepared to see Britain and the EU becoming less and less influential on the international stage. Ultimately, the same will need to happen in the U.N. Security Council, but that will take longer."
Source: United Press International
Related Links
Royal Institute of International Affairs
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
SUPERPOWERS
New US Black Sea Policy Urged
Washington DC (UPI) Dec 18, 2006
The United States needs a new comprehensive strategy to deal with the Black Sea region, a new report from the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think tank, says. The new report, by Heritage energy and Eurasia expert Ariel Cohen and Conway Irwin, a writer on energy affairs, urged the Bush administration to "pursue a circumspect, balanced, and realistic strategy to enhance the security and stability of the Black Sea basin."
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://ussliberty.orghttp://ssunitedstates.org
