Author Topic: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!  (Read 11243 times)

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« on: July 04, 2008, 01:58:09 PM »
Quote
On top of these perplexing shifts in position, we find ourselves disagreeing powerfully with Mr. Obama on two other issues: the death penalty and gun control.

Mr. Obama endorsed the Supreme Courts decision to overturn the District of Columbias gun-control law. We knew he ascribed to the anti-gun-control groups misreading of the Constitution as implying an individual right to bear arms. But it was distressing to see him declare that the court provided a guide to reasonable regulations enacted by local communities to keep their streets safe.

What could be more reasonable than a city restricting handguns, or requiring that firearms be stored in ways that do not present a mortal threat to children?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/04/opinion/04fri1.html?ref=opinion


This isn't an op-ed but an editorial which I can only assume was written either by the head editor or the entire editorial staff.  Did I miss something?  Am I in the twilight zone? The head of the Joyce foundation, crafter of gun shop ban bill, and voter for Ted Kennedy's .30-30 ban is pro-gun?!??! hahahha This shows how clueless the NYT's is.  Or maybe this just proves how much of a no-compromise anti-gun nazi the NYT is.  I can't wait for their next anti 1A article.  It will sit very nicely next to their anti 2A articles.

stevelyn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,130
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2008, 02:27:38 PM »
Calling Obama "pro-gun" is like calling the Nazi SS "The Department of Public Safety".
Be careful that the toes you step on now aren't connected to the ass you have to kiss later.

Eat Moose. Wear Wolf.

xavier fremboe

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 904
  • All-American Meanie
    • The Shop
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2008, 12:17:57 AM »
He has yet to say what he thinks is 'reasonable regulation'.  Remember, he's trying to move to the middle without making any commitments whatsoever. 

This is going to make Clintonian parsing look like straightforward 'See Jane.  See Jane run."

Clinton has slayed his thousands.  Barack will slay his tens of thousands...
If the bandersnatch seems even mildly frumious, best to shun it.  Really. http://www.cctplastics.com

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2008, 04:19:45 AM »
He has yet to say what he thinks is 'reasonable regulation'.  Remember, he's trying to move to the middle without making any commitments whatsoever. 

He has already said in his term as senator.

Ban on the sale, transfer or ownership of any semiautomatic firearm.

National ban on concealed carry for all but police and military.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2008, 06:05:52 AM »
Manedwolf, you should be very careful in accusing any politician of consistency, least of all this empty-headed Obama, who's only concern is being President.  And you definitely shouldn't expect any politician, even a very honest and idealistic one, to propose the same platform for the nation at large as he would for his home-state.

While Obama's record in Illinois is indeed a chilling warning of his own hatred of human rights, that doesn't mean he's going to carry that program to the White House.  Other politicians have completely changed their stance, once they achieve national power.  Obama will probably be the same. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

wmenorr67

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,775
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2008, 06:35:03 AM »
Manedwolf, you should be very careful in accusing any politician of consistency, least of all this empty-headed Obama, who's only concern is being President.  And you definitely shouldn't expect any politician, even a very honest and idealistic one, to propose the same platform for the nation at large as he would for his home-state.

While Obama's record in Illinois is indeed a chilling warning of his own hatred of human rights, that doesn't mean he's going to carry that program to the White House.  Other politicians have completely changed their stance, once they achieve national power.  Obama will probably be the same. 

Were you able to type that with a straight face?
There are five things, above all else, that make life worth living: a good relationship with God, a good woman, good health, good friends, and a good cigar.

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier.  One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Bacon is the candy bar of meats!

Only the dead have seen the end of war!

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2008, 06:58:07 AM »
Uh, yeah.  What I'm sayin' is that a politician will play one way to one crowd, and change their tune for another.  Obama won't be any friend to gun owners, but he knows that what plays very well in Chicago won't be so popular in Iowa. 

IOW, don't expect Obama to keep his word.
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2008, 07:01:37 AM »
What Obama wants is clear enough.  We know that in this and other issues he's slithering toward the center for reasons of political expediency.

I expect Obama to be The Great Catalyst--if he's elected (may it NOT be so!).  For all the things he claims he doesn't want.
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2008, 07:45:29 AM »
Other politicians have completely changed their stance, once they achieve national power.

Can you provide a historical example?  I have a difficult time believing someone can change THAT much.  Obama's anti-gun sentiment travels very very deep.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2008, 08:16:52 AM »
Change how much?  I didn't say he was going to sign some national CCW legislation.  I just said that he's probably going to back off of the idea of a nation-wide ban on CCW, and in general, he's not going to attempt the sort of extreme gun control he might get away with in Illinois.  He's playing to a larger, more moderate audience now.  Again, he'll still be anti-gun, but he won't be AS anti-gun as he tried to be in Illinois. 

As far as historical examples, you may have me there.  I have always heard that people like Al Gore and Dick Gephardt were anti-abortion until they reached the national stage.  I've also heard that Al Gore was pro-gun in his days of local politics.  But I'm not sure where to go to verify those things. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2008, 08:41:42 AM »
Change how much?  I didn't say he was going to sign some national CCW legislation.  I just said that he's probably going to back off of the idea of a nation-wide ban on CCW, and in general, he's not going to attempt the sort of extreme gun control he might get away with in Illinois.  He's playing to a larger, more moderate audience now.  Again, he'll still be anti-gun, but he won't be AS anti-gun as he tried to be in Illinois. 

Sure he will.

If there's one thing he excels at, it's emotional evangelical speaking, with swooning followers. He'll make impassioned speeches about VIOLENCE...in the INNER CITIES. And how it HAS to STOP.

You better believe he will. And facts won't even come into play at all, either.

You better be buying hi-cap mags and all the semiautos and rifles you want now, because if he's elected, by this time next year, it will all be illegal. Feinstein, Schumer and the rest of the hard left will go absolutely freaking crazy and dig out every assault weapon bill they dreamed of, and Obama won't only sign them, he'll campaign for their passage.

I even fully expect they'd dig up the Illinois plan of a $100 per year tax on every firearm. Probably also ban storage of ammunition, and make a publically displayed registry of people who have an "arsenal", as defined as more than six firearms. Why wouldn't they? It's their dream.

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2008, 08:55:37 AM »
I agree with you that the usual suspects will try to enact draconian bans but I have a little trouble believing they will succeed in getting them through.  I could be dead wrong, of course.  I think the same thing is true with an illegal alien amnesty; we know "they" want it but the people don't.

So what happens?
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2008, 09:00:12 AM »
Violence in the inner cities does have to stop, but I am skeptical that the rest of us, who don't live in the inner city and aren't violent, are going to really be okay with being asked to assume the moral identity of the underclass in America.  That seems to be Obama's intent but as he begins to implement it it is going to met with increasing resistance.  What looks dandy in theory, as a sop to one's unction, will look much less appealing, even to arch-liberals, when they realize what's entailed socially, economically, and politically.  It will be hard to get the American middle-class to LIVE FOR the American underclass, to give up their own lifestyle, and that's essentially what he's asking.
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #13 on: July 05, 2008, 10:30:22 AM »
I agree with you that the usual suspects will try to enact draconian bans but I have a little trouble believing they will succeed in getting them through.  I could be dead wrong, of course.  I think the same thing is true with an illegal alien amnesty; we know "they" want it but the people don't.

So what happens?

A little trouble?  I used to think it an impossibility that the supreme court would rule 5-4 on the 2A

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #14 on: July 05, 2008, 11:52:11 AM »
Quote
You better be buying hi-cap mags and all the semiautos and rifles you want now, because if he's elected, by this time next year, it will all be illegal.

If I had more than two nickels to rub together, I would.  As it is, it's a good thing I haven't fired my guns in a couple of years.  Can't afford to restock on ammo.  If Obama does take us down the road you're describing, I'll have nothing but my Mauser, as far as military rifles go.  It's a good thing I've already got the best combat rifle on the planet.   smiley  Now, I just need a bunch of thirty-ought on clips. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,668
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2008, 12:07:36 PM »
I went shooting this morning at a local gun shop and range, and there was a car in the parking lot with an "OBAMA '08" bumper sticker.  rolleyes

I also saw my first "CTHULHU '08 - why vote for a lesser evil?" bumper sticker today.  grin

Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

Finch

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 465
    • Fading Freedoms
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2008, 01:10:50 PM »
Anybody else thinking that this is a tactic by the NYT and the OBAMA machine to trick people into thinking that Obama is pro-gun in an attempt to swipe vote from McCain? It's seems like a smart strategy to get a liberal rag to publish a piece on how Obama is pro-gun to get people who are tired of Bush like politics but still value their 2A rights.
Truth is treason in the empire of lies - Ron Paul

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2008, 01:15:29 PM »
Anybody else thinking that this is a tactic by the NYT and the OBAMA machine to trick people into thinking that Obama is pro-gun in an attempt to swipe vote from McCain? It's seems like a smart strategy to get a liberal rag to publish a piece on how Obama is pro-gun to get people who are tired of Bush like politics but still value their 2A rights.

That was my first thought, too.  They have the NYT criticize Obama for being pro-gun, so the dumb yokels in flyover country think Obama is pro-gun and vote for him.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2008, 03:00:57 PM »
Wait, you mean Obama is pro-gun?!  Woo-hoo, I guess I can finally vote for him, then! 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2008, 03:24:00 PM »
Quote
You better be buying hi-cap mags and all the semiautos and rifles you want now, because if he's elected, by this time next year, it will all be illegal.

If I had more than two nickels to rub together, I would.  As it is, it's a good thing I haven't fired my guns in a couple of years.  Can't afford to restock on ammo.  If Obama does take us down the road you're describing, I'll have nothing but my Mauser, as far as military rifles go.  It's a good thing I've already got the best combat rifle on the planet.   smiley  Now, I just need a bunch of thirty-ought on clips. 

Uh-uh. No ammunition storage over 100 rounds in a private residence. Because if they go off, they could kill firefighters by shooting them, or children could steal them and use them. Why, they could just go off by themselves! Oh, yeah...and no military calibers, either, because that's what Mexico does. That "belongs on foreign battlefields, not in our streets". And the only purpose for 8mm Mauser ammunition is to kill cops.

You really don't think that sort of asinine thing would come along as well?

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2008, 04:13:14 PM »
Uh-uh. No ammunition storage over 100 rounds in a private residence. Because if they go off, they could kill firefighters by shooting them, or children could steal them and use them. Why, they could just go off by themselves! Oh, yeah...and no military calibers, either, because that's what Mexico does. That "belongs on foreign battlefields, not in our streets". And the only purpose for 8mm Mauser ammunition is to kill cops.

You really don't think that sort of asinine thing would come along as well?

For sure he going to need to bring all the troops home from Iraq to enforce that one  shocked
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2008, 04:29:01 PM »
How do you know what caliber my Mauser is?  'Cause you guessed wrong.  Tongue

You're just not getting my point, though.  Yes, he might like to do all those things.  But the point is that you're giving Obama too much credit.  Look at how he's already flip-flopped on the Heller decision.  You can't trust a politician to take the same platform with him to the Oval Office, that he was pimping in Chicago.  It's a different constituency, and Obama will play to that different constituency. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #22 on: July 05, 2008, 05:06:21 PM »
How do you know what caliber my Mauser is?  'Cause you guessed wrong.  Tongue

You're just not getting my point, though.  Yes, he might like to do all those things.  But the point is that you're giving Obama too much credit.  Look at how he's already flip-flopped on the Heller decision.  You can't trust a politician to take the same platform with him to the Oval Office, that he was pimping in Chicago.  It's a different constituency, and Obama will play to that different constituency. 

And I think he's only saying whateve he thinks he needs to say to get elected, then he'll be free to show his true agenda.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #23 on: July 05, 2008, 08:22:14 PM »
Firstly, he'll want to get re-elected.  Secondly, as President he would have to depend on the support of Congress-folk who also wish to get re-elected, and that would be true even in the awful event of an Obama second term. 

And I still think you give him too much credit, in speaking of his "true agenda."  You and I have a "true agenda," because we have principles.  I don't know that Obama has any. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: NYT's attacks Obama for being *gasp* pro-gun!??!?!??!
« Reply #24 on: July 06, 2008, 01:25:19 AM »
Quote
I also saw my first "CTHULHU '08 - why vote for a lesser evil?" bumper sticker today.  grin

Poor Cthulhu. In this election, the sticker actually works against him.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner