Perhaps you could explain yourself, because I'm not following you.
Don't confuse my intolerance for further defamation of me and mine with me reaching some sort of breaking point.
And the 2000-2006 Congresses don't speak for "you and yours?"
Republican House, Republican Senate, Republican President. It was RINO/NeoCon heaven with drunken spending saturnalias, and increases to the domestic surveillance/security industry unparalleled in American history.
2006 was the uninformed electorate trying the old bait-and-switch that used to work... when the Repubs misbehave, put the Dems in power. 2006-2008 showed that didn't work, so the uninformed electorate tried it again with the President. Still didn't work, so 2010 we ALMOST wised up to the game and put the beginnings of a 3rd party into the mix.
The Repubs can go back to their cold-war era practices and regain the trust of the electorate... or they can stick on this new track of spending like the Devil may care and chopping civil liberties apart and become the minority 3rd party to the Tea Party.
But if stuff doesn't get better QUICK from 2010-2012, and blame put squarely in the face of Obama and his pets in the Senate, there very well may be a 3rd party.
Is anyone else reaching a breaking point?
Yep. And so are a lot of other people.
The electorate is PRIMED for a splinter 3rd party, and they have a new name they can trust. If the Tea Party Repubs try to reform things and the GOP doesn't get behind them (or worse: obstructs it)... kiss the GOP good-bye.
McCain, Boehner, Brown, Snowe... take heed. The Tea Party House knows the right response to incidents like the Tucson shooting: we have enough laws, and no additional laws would have stopped this. The shooter broke quite a few laws during his spree.
We don't need "feel good legislation." We need effective legislation that is acted upon, or we need less legislation. The Tea Party knows this.
The GOP appears to not.