No one has claimed that the NFL gives all potential owners an anal exam on their political views and then rejects all conservatives, so what is your point?
People have claimed that conservatives can't buy things that liberals can, when really it's divisive loudmouths who are being excluded and not conservatives.
My point has not been about Limbaugh being dumped on in general or saying the controversy surrounding him isn't political,
I've been specifically referring to Goodell and his decision. My entire point is that Goodell's decision was the right one to make for the NFL and there's no reason to assume
his decision was a political one when it makes sense as a business decision. That much controversy surrounding a buyer is a good enough reason to reject him whether that controversy is political or not.
He would be forced to make the same decision if George Soros' presence in the group caused similar outrage - but it simply does not because George Soros is less controversial. Just because everyone here dislikes him and believes he should cause more of an uproar doesn't make it so. No one really cares enough to make noise about it and because of that Goodell doesn't have to reject him like he did Limbaugh. It's not because he's a liberal and Limbaugh's a conservative, it's because no one is claiming they'll never play for a team because of George Soros. I can't think of a liberal who would cause the same fracas as Limbaugh.
