Here's your fork:
"And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up"
Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995
This is the best you've got? Seriously? He said fifteen years ago that drug laws ought to be enforced like any other law, and this is the proof that he's calling for "far harsher" sentences, or trying to destroy people's lives? And you don't even have context for it?
Nice try. We need a point and giggle smiley.
I heard him call for harsher penalties a few years back when I was listening regularly. Which is why I was asking if he still held that position.
Fisty: maybe people feel the need to point it out because of the kneejerk response it illicits. "He's a great man, he's done more for our country than you, you couldn't do what he does, you're just jealous etc etc"
Well, well, the truth is now a knee-jerk response.
But if he really did call for harsher sentencing, I'll take your word for it. I know it's hard to cite sources for talk radio, so I accept that. Still, harsher penalties for dealing crack is not the same as harsher sentences for doctor shopping. And since the state had no evidence against Limbaugh, we'll never know if he was a hypocrite. He didn't have to face the penalties, any more than any other drug offender who's acquitted.