With the above you demonstrate your complete failure to see the core of my position, which I have incessantly reiterated, i.e., no given/factual state whatsoever is capable of determining a human act, and, law is a given factual state.
Please reread my statement once again. I specifically said that circumstances and situations
do not determine or define human action in response to them, however human action is almost always shaped, impacted, and influenced by circumstances and situations.
Do you really disagree with that?
It is really so radically simple what I am maintaining. Givens are not determinative of human action, law is a given, hence law is not determinative of human conduct.
A circumstance does not need to absolutely determine a person's action to influence it. If you don't believe circumstances influence your actions then I'm not sure that you can be said to be conscious. However, I happen to know for a fact that circumstances have determined your conduct. When people here didn't receive your haughty pronouncements positively you got snippy. Is that not your human action slavishly responding to your circumstance and situation?
Your continual insults are a horrid bore...you call my position silly; while there can be nothing more serious than questioning the viability of law per se.
Yes, your position is silly. As dogmush said, you've taken a minor but valid observation and extrapolated from that to the point that it bears no resemblance to reality.
I agree that people can choose to defy law.
I agree that law can be corrupt or rapacious.
I do not agree that
law is universally corrupt and rapacious. You've provided no support for that assertion.
I do not agree that
Bosco1 telling everyone to read Sartre is likely to "raise everyone's natural dignity/nobility and effect a calm" or that it will lead to a "final totalization of what civilization can be." You've provided no support for that assertion either.
Overthrow the Sartreian texts upon which I predicate my critique of law, by reasoning;
Show me the Sartreian texts you're using to support the items I disagree with (noted above in red) and I'd be happy to address them directly. The texts you've posted so far do not support the assertions you've made.
and, quit continually screwing with my person!
I'm flattered, but you can rest assured that I will not be screwing with your person, either continually or intermittently.