R.I.P. Scout26
That's always been the excuse.
Although there have been high-profile exceptions, the Justice Department generally does not publish derogatory information about individuals not charged with crimes. As a result, it is not clear how much information, if any, Mr. Barr would choose to include about Mr. Trump and other key figures in the investigation if there are no charges against them.
The whole notion of any Democrats being held accountable for their almost treasonous behavior by the spineless leadership of The Stupid Party is laughable.
I thought current regulations were that an independent counsel report can't be made public.
“I want the American people to know as much as they can and to see as much as they can. The taxpayers paid millions for this information, and they should get to see all of it.”
Hitler finds out the Mueller investigation is over:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cVsmuxOj28
Today in memes that didn't age well:Duh. The left can't meme.
Today in memes that didn't age well:
So tell me, did any of those people who threatened to leave the U.S. if this or that happened actually leave after the aforesaid this or that actually happened?That would be the best thing ever.
When they said leave they were using the word “colloquially,” for public consumption
The two-volume, 448-page report recounts how Trump repeatedly sought to take control of the Russia probe.Mueller evaluated 10 episodes for possible obstruction of justice, including Trump's firing of FBI Director James Comey, the president's directive to subordinates to have Mueller fired and efforts to encourage witnesses not to cooperate.
The special counsel also reviewed whether the president had obstructed justice in any way, but ultimately did not come to a conclusion on that issue. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, though, said the evidence was “not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.”
Not so fast, according to a CNN panel, which was moderated by Jake Tapper. Tapper noted that while Americans "should be happy" our president did not conspire with the Kremlin, Barr's repeating that fact six or seven times was rather "obsessive."CNN legal analyst Laura Coates took it to the next level by noting it was "suspicious."