If the Dumb.Gov would leave mask requirements up to individual business owners, I'm good with that. It leaves the choice where it should be.
I'm drafting a letter right now (physical letter, not email), that suggests that very thing. Mask mandates limited to state facilities only, which is their prerogative, but otherwise leave businesses and persons to make their own choices. It's their right to choose who they serve and how they serve them. Enforcement limited to being asked to leave. If an individual refuses to leave after being asked to do so by the owner, there are other statutes which come into play (trespassing, criminal mischief, etc) so there is no need for an added layer of complexity. Municipal entities are limited in the same fashion... mask mandates limited to their offices/facilities, and enforcement limited to asked non-complying persons to leave.
Also, individuals cannot be fined or arrested for non-compliance unless other factors are at play, things like threats of harm, overtly aggressive behaviors, vandalism, etc, which already have statutory teeth. That will quash this BS heavy-handedness that's cropping up all over the place.
Brad