What amazes me the most is they seem completely blind to their own bias. They mention that Breitbart's use of the emotionally charged term "illegal alien" is evidence of contextual disinformation, yet in the same paragraph describe Breitbart as "notorious". Do they really receive government money for this?
Those who control the language control the narrative.
An alien is someone from another locale.
Illegal is something contrary to the law.
Therefore, in a sane world, someone from another locale who is in the United States unlawfully is BY DEFINITION an "illegal alien." That's a simple fact. Only in clown world would that be deemed "disinformation."