Terry sticks his neck out with another prediction:
With a sensitive meter such as Flukes are, the most you would read is 12 Volts,
I would bet, going from either lead of the output of your 24 volt xfrmr to ground. (1.414 times that (16.97V) if you're measuring peak-to-peak, which IIRC, most Fluke RMS meters will do if you want them to.)
Reason? The secondary of the transformer is sitting in, so to speak, "free space," and while the voltage
between the output leads would be 24 volts, you would be measuring each individual lead to a
virtual center tap on the transformer, i.e., ground.
A relay will not operate on the very low currents available from either leg of the xfrmr to ground, as I said, in the microampere range. It would sink the low currents available so that almost no voltage could build up, just as a low-impedance meter would sink that current and give almost no voltage reading.
I notice the only ones bumping this thread are myself, 280plus, and Jim147, so I'm willing to either quit this or take it to PMs.
Terry "If It Works, It's a Fluke," 230RN
Root-Mean-Square measurements:
http://www.practicalphysics.org/go/Guidance_107.htmlThe True RMS meter actually takes rapid samples of the varying voltage and actually does this calculation
within the meter's own software and comes up with a true RMS value regardless of the shape of the input waveform.
The non-True RMS meter is just simply calibrated to "sorta" come up with an RMS voltage
assuming that the input waveform is sinusoidal. Which it might not be. Other, old-fashioned RMS meters actually measured the heating value of the current by measuring the temperature change of a calibrated heating element and working from that.