Paul of course. Didn't need the report to know that.
Although Romney was far better than I expected.
A Romney/Paul ticket might be our best hope, or Paul in a cabinet position with some actual fiscal teeth might be the best we can hope for.
Not as bad as Gingrich although everyone but his backers knew he was a space-cadet, but Santorum's numbers show him to be the moralizing RINO he actually is.
Although overall the most frightening thing was that even Paul's numbers didn't really chew down the debt below 75% of GDP, and of course that's assuming Congress would give him a budget he was willing to sign, and assuming he actually was able to hold onto the reins of policy for the full eight years, and then after that... it's game-on again.
Even if Paul was POTUS, and Congress was Republican landslided, and amenable to every last cut he wanted... What we'd really need are STRUCTURAL/CONSTITUTIONAL changes so such deficit spending is IMPOSSIBLE no matter who's in power, or what their economic policies are.
I can only conclude even the Paul presidency of (some of) our dreams... would only buy us some time and breathing room. Not a "fix".