Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: Perd Hapley on May 13, 2016, 01:27:34 PM

Title: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Perd Hapley on May 13, 2016, 01:27:34 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/13/report-obama-administration-to-tell-public-schools-to-let-transgender-students-use-bathrooms-their-choice.html


It's a good thing the Supremes ended the marriage debate, so we could put all the gender/sexuality issues behind us, forever. Now let's all give in on this one, so the left can move on to their next demand.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: brimic on May 13, 2016, 01:50:24 PM
Pedos next....but a lot of us saw this coming years ago.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: lupinus on May 13, 2016, 01:56:26 PM
It sure would be a shame if we focused our efforts in school to educating kids so that they didn't need remedial English courses in college or teaching any semblance of critical thinking skills, instead of focusing on social engineering and teh feelz.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: brimic on May 13, 2016, 02:41:09 PM
It sure would be a shame if we focused our efforts in school to educating kids so that they didn't need remedial English courses in college or teaching any semblance of critical thinking skills, instead of focusing on social engineering and teh feelz.

Except that its by design that the kids are fully immersed in teh feelz and not taught to think or reason.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: makattak on May 13, 2016, 02:55:58 PM
I need to quarrel with you. It's not "Bathrooms, again"

It's "Bathrooms, still"

It never stopped being an issue for the left and once they had their political victory on gay faux marriage, they moved on to the next outpost.

The most telling is posts I saw on the book of faces from supporters of this nonsense.

"This isn't about bathrooms, just like it wasn't about water fountains!"


Quite right. Those of us opposing you have known all along this wasn't about bathrooms, or survivor benefits, or visitation rights, or "privacy". It's about using the force of government to dictate acceptance of a perverse and delusional lifestyle.
Title: Obama Escalates World War T
Post by: roo_ster on May 13, 2016, 04:03:29 PM
Obama Escalates World War T
http://www.unz.com/isteve/obama-escalates-world-war-t/

"I pointed out this war was being launched exactly three years ago in a post entitled “Post-Gay Marriage, Cont.” Sure, it’s nuts, but there’s a certain kind of lunatic logic to it in that they won so much with their previous offensives that they ran out of anything else to do. Because they had no intention of declaring peace, this would have to be the next stage of their war:"

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a transgender’s privates waving in an adolescent girl’s face – forever.”
----Georgianne "Sugartits" Orwell

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/05/post-gay-marriage-cont.html
Title: Re: Obama Escalates World War T
Post by: brimic on May 13, 2016, 04:15:23 PM


“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a transgender’s privates waving in an adolescent girl’s face – forever.”
----Georgianne "Sugartits" Orwell


Oh, it will be a lot worse than that, count on it. :mad:
Title: Re: Obama Escalates World War T
Post by: Perd Hapley on May 13, 2016, 04:28:53 PM
Obama Escalates World War T
http://www.unz.com/isteve/obama-escalates-world-war-t/

"I pointed out this war was being launched exactly three years ago in a post entitled “Post-Gay Marriage, Cont.” Sure, it’s nuts, but there’s a certain kind of lunatic logic to it in that they won so much with their previous offensives that they ran out of anything else to do. Because they had no intention of declaring peace, this would have to be the next stage of their war:"

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a transgender’s privates waving in an adolescent girl’s face – forever.”
----Georgianne "Sugartits" Orwell

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/05/post-gay-marriage-cont.html


Recall the Janet Jackson Superbowl show? "It's just a nipple. Get over it." We should not be surprised when they tell us, "it's just a penis."
Title: Re: Obama Escalates World War T
Post by: KD5NRH on May 13, 2016, 05:14:23 PM
Recall the Janet Jackson Superbowl show? "It's just a nipple. Get over it." We should not be surprised when they tell us, "it's just a penis."

While I'm still a firm believer that the Almighty had no concern whatsoever for aesthetics when designing male genitalia, I'd rather see an uncensored all-nude version of So You Think You Can Dance on prime time than the level of violence and language that has become quite "normal" even at times when kids are likely to be watching.

After all, I'd rather my daughters grow up thinking it's acceptable to tango naked with someone special than thinking the same about dismembering someone with an ax while screaming obscenities...unless that someone tried to coerce them into a naked tango they found unacceptable, of course.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: longeyes on May 13, 2016, 05:49:44 PM
Perhaps you missed the latest Executive Order mandating public nudity on Thursdays and Fridays.  Some hidden clause in the Civil Rights Act of '64.
Title: Re: Obama Escalates World War T
Post by: Perd Hapley on May 13, 2016, 07:09:00 PM
While I'm still a firm believer that the Almighty had no concern whatsoever for aesthetics when designing male genitalia, I'd rather see an uncensored all-nude version of So You Think You Can Dance on prime time than the level of violence and language that has become quite "normal" even at times when kids are likely to be watching.

After all, I'd rather my daughters grow up thinking it's acceptable to tango naked with someone special than thinking the same about dismembering someone with an ax while screaming obscenities...unless that someone tried to coerce them into a naked tango they found unacceptable, of course.


It's just a bloody, mangled corpse.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: HankB on May 13, 2016, 10:13:47 PM
Expect troops of high school  - heck elementary school - boys heading into the girl's locker rooms to catch an eyefull . . . 

:facepalm:
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: French G. on May 13, 2016, 11:05:49 PM
Well, if you are a democratic down ticket you are officially SMHFML because you gotta defend this crap because your opponents just got red meat. As did the Donald.

1 in 2500 is trans, maybe. 3%are gay. And 97% of us are dupes. i figure they do this, the true bigots come out, the the left base mobilizes in reaction to all those bigoted republicans. The vocal bigots are probably a corresponding 3%. We red state types will get broad brushed like it is all of us. I figure this is SJ prelide to race wars part whatever that should light off any minute now. Hey, the line on elections suspended is still probably better than the cubs winning the series. Hillary gets indicted once she is the candidate, so we have to get things stable, this is just temporary, I hate to do this, etc.   [tinfoil] [tinfoil] [tinfoil] [tinfoil] [tinfoil]
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: roo_ster on May 14, 2016, 08:21:02 AM
Sex and state power.

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2016/05/13/sex-and-state-power-whats-behind-obamas-transgender-push/
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on May 14, 2016, 01:45:04 PM
Meanwhile, some tabloid is claiming that Bruce Caitlyn Jenner is considering un-transitioning because he she it still likes women and, because he she it is a devout Christian, he she it thinks it would be sinful to engage in a relationship with a woman if he she it is a drag queen.

And other tabloids are "reporting" that the rest of the Kardashian circus are wishing Bruce Caitlyn would just have the surgery and be done with it.

My view is that, regardless of what kinds of clothing he she it wears or what name he she it chooses to use, if it has male genitalia it's a male. If it's a male wearing women's clothing, it's a transvestite, not a transexual.

I guess that makes me a bigot. So report me.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: RoadKingLarry on May 15, 2016, 12:00:09 AM
It's too bad the Obama administration doesn't enforce actual existing laws as written* instead of spending resources inventing new laws by means of kaleidoscope interpretations of existing laws and then enforcing said made up laws by threat of force.


Immigration, tax code (Al Sharpton), national security/classified material...
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: zxcvbob on May 15, 2016, 12:41:07 AM
I'm trying to think how a large school district (like Houston ISD) could subvert this.  Announce that to be in compliance with the new Obama bathroom policy, anyone can now pee wherever they want.  >:D  Replace the "boys" and "girls" signs with ones that just say "toilet", and have buckets in the corners of the classrooms, in case someone takes "wherever" literally (and encourage them to do so.)  Blame the feds for the whole mess when the lynch mob shows up at the next school board meeting.

I don't think I quite have it right yet...
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on May 15, 2016, 10:47:27 AM
To further clarify (or muddy) the picture, this is what the International Plumbing Code says on the subject:

Quote
403.2 Separate facilities. Where plumbing fixtures are
required, separate facilities shall be provided for each sex.

Exceptions:

1. Separate facilities shall not be required for dwelling
units and sleeping units.

2. Separate facilities shall not be required in structures
or tenant spaces with a total occupant load, including
both employees and customers, of 15 or fewer.

3. Separate facilities shall not be required in mercantile
occupancies in which the maximum occupant
load is 100 or fewer.

Of course, so far the IPC hasn't caught up with the new wave of political correctness, so they don't include a definition of "sex." Which means, as far as code enforcement is concerned, most building and plumbing inspectors still look for a "men's" room and a "women's" room. But the inspectors don't have any say in who is allowed to use said separate-by-sex facilities -- they just have to verify that they have been provided (unless the building meets one of the three exceptions).

I think the solution lies in the next paragraph of the IPC:

Quote
403.2.1 Family or assisted-use toilet facilities serving as
separate facilities.
Where a building or tenant space
requires a separate toilet facility for each sex and each toilet
facility is required to have only one water closet, two
family/assisted-use toilet facilities shall be permitted to
serve as the required separate facilities. Family or assisted use
toilet facilities shall not be required to be identified for
exclusive use by either sex as required by Section 403.4.

In other words, make everything a one-holer. Of course, larger buildings requiring multiple toilets won't like that because it wastes more space. But more and more malls and other large venues now offer a "family" toilet room, either for parents accompanying other-sex children or for adults accompanying an elederly or otherwise incapacitated person whe requires assistance. These "family" toilet rooms are not gender-specific. I think so-called "transgender" people who are not really transgender (like Bruce/Caitlyn) should be required to use the separate, "family" toilet rooms.

Of course, they'll claim they are being discriminated against.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: HankB on May 15, 2016, 10:16:59 PM
What I'm waiting for is an entire school football team to declare that on some particular day, they're all women.

And then simply march in to use the women's shower facilities.

At the same time they're in use by the (actual female) cheerleading squad. 

 [popcorn]

Once again, we're spending altogether too much time and effort to assuage the supposed hurt feelings of the lunatic fringe.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: lupinus on May 15, 2016, 10:21:34 PM
So will they have to put the little feminine hygiene receptacles in the men's stalls for the not so men not so feminely hygienic disposal?


Sent from my iPhone. Freaking autocorrect.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: never_retreat on May 17, 2016, 05:19:00 PM
I just knew this was going to happen. I go into the men's restroom and yep, there's a tranny.


(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13237577_10206364905140812_6984120359781559296_n.jpg?oh=758eb6af485e5365e68d4fe6e1dd0455&oe=57D8891C)
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: MechAg94 on May 17, 2016, 05:33:46 PM
Meanwhile, some tabloid is claiming that Bruce Caitlyn Jenner is considering un-transitioning because he she it still likes women and, because he she it is a devout Christian, he she it thinks it would be sinful to engage in a relationship with a woman if he she it is a drag queen.

And other tabloids are "reporting" that the rest of the Kardashian circus are wishing Bruce Caitlyn would just have the surgery and be done with it.

My view is that, regardless of what kinds of clothing he she it wears or what name he she it chooses to use, if it has male genitalia it's a male. If it's a male wearing women's clothing, it's a transvestite, not a transexual.

I guess that makes me a bigot. So report me.
IMO, I think Bruce never got it cut off and never will because this is all just a scheme to make millions just like his daughters have.  I would be very surprised if he ever actually gets the surgery. 
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: roo_ster on May 17, 2016, 05:58:43 PM
IMO, I think Bruce never got it cut off and never will because this is all just a scheme to make millions just like his daughters have.  I would be very surprised if he ever actually gets the surgery. 

Didn;t he get the facial surgery done? 
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: RoadKingLarry on May 17, 2016, 06:43:46 PM
That's what they call "cosmetic".
Chopping of vital bits of anatomy is a whole 'nuther ballgame.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on May 17, 2016, 07:20:51 PM
IMO, I think Bruce never got it cut off and never will because this is all just a scheme to make millions just like his daughters have.  I would be very surprised if he ever actually gets the surgery. 

I agree completely.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Fitz on May 17, 2016, 10:16:25 PM
Meanwhile, some tabloid is claiming that Bruce Caitlyn Jenner is considering un-transitioning because he she it still likes women and, because he she it is a devout Christian, he she it thinks it would be sinful to engage in a relationship with a woman if he she it is a drag queen.

And other tabloids are "reporting" that the rest of the Kardashian circus are wishing Bruce Caitlyn would just have the surgery and be done with it.

My view is that, regardless of what kinds of clothing he she it wears or what name he she it chooses to use, if it has male genitalia it's a male. If it's a male wearing women's clothing, it's a transvestite, not a transexual.

I guess that makes me a bigot. So report me.

Trans people who change their mind are HEAVILY vilified by the trans "community", some pushed to suicide by the torment.

Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: roo_ster on May 17, 2016, 11:04:51 PM
Trans people who change their mind are HEAVILY vilified by the trans "community", some pushed to suicide by the torment.

World War T is such a nihilistic horrorshow, from beginning to end. 
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Fitz on May 17, 2016, 11:11:55 PM
World War T is such a nihilistic horrorshow, from beginning to end. 
It really is

I know two, actually. Both are irritated that this is even coming up. They both said that they go into the bathroom where they're least likely to be noticed as "not belonging" (in this case, both are post op, and very feminine looking, so they go into the ladies room. They also both are sexually attracted to males.

I've made my feelings on this known before... we're doing these people a great disservice by "normalizing" this stuff. I am not saying we need to spit in their faces and start with the gassing, but it should be treated like the mental disorder that it is. Even in cases where "transitioning" is the best option for a person, they will still require a lifetime of therapy and mental health care.

The suicide rate amongst the transgender is getting worse, and it's my belief that the whole "it's normal, be whatever you want" instead of treating it like the disorder that it is, is chiefly responsible for that.

And, the rest of the "community" eats their own young. come out in any way contrary to the SJW army, and you're destroyed
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Angel Eyes on May 18, 2016, 06:26:49 PM
Some high school students in Vermont have had enough:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/vermont-high-schoolers-clash-over-transgender-bathroom-rules-190550886.html

Quote
The new policy, however, has since resulted in counterprotests from students who feel that their opinions are being overshadowed by the demands of a small minority.

“It’s like me going into a girls’ bathroom wearing a wig,” 15-year-old Tanner Bischofberger, who disagrees with the school’s policy, told the Times. “It’s just weird.”

Bischofberger was one of several students at Green Mountain this week who sported a T-shirt with the words “Straight Pride” printed beneath the male and female stick figures typically used to demarcate public bathrooms.

No doubt the Straight Pride shirts will be denounced as "hate speech."
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Firethorn on May 18, 2016, 06:35:06 PM
No doubt the Straight Pride shirts will be denounced as "hate speech."

Well of course they will!

I mean, just look at the hate for "all lives matter"
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 04, 2016, 03:56:02 PM
Received from a friend by e-mail:

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi39.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fe193%2FAguilaBlanca%2FMiscellaneous%2FProblem_solved_zpspfznca94.jpg&hash=799095c607fe0bdeb64c165832be629932288ad7)
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: bedlamite on June 04, 2016, 04:09:01 PM
Received from a friend by e-mail:

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwebmaila.juno.com%2Fwebmail%2Fnew%2F21%3Ffolder%3DInbox%26amp%3BmsgNum%3D0000Gv00%3A001NK%5EyU00002vKB%26amp%3Bcount%3D1465069961%26amp%3Brandid%3D1114794385%26amp%3BattachId%3D10&hash=09defb2ad6d9dc65f112db6c2501cc335e9ad476)

So can we have your email username and password to see it?
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 04, 2016, 08:42:45 PM
So can we have your email username and password to see it?

That's downright weird. The link is there if I edit the post, but it doesn't show up if I save it.

See if y'all can open this link:

http://webmaila.juno.com/webmail/new/21?folder=Inbox&msgNum=0000Gv00:001NK^yU00002vKB&count=1465069961&randid=1114794385&attachId=10
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Fly320s on June 04, 2016, 08:46:45 PM
That's downright weird. The link is there if I edit the post, but it doesn't show up if I save it.

See if y'all can open this link:

http://webmaila.juno.com/webmail/new/21?folder=Inbox&msgNum=0000Gv00:001NK^yU00002vKB&count=1465069961&randid=1114794385&attachId=10

No.  Need to sign in.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 04, 2016, 08:48:20 PM
My apologies. I saved it and posted a new link to it. Should work now (I hope).
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: RocketMan on June 04, 2016, 09:06:33 PM
My apologies. I saved it and posted a new link to it. Should work now (I hope).

Yep, it's visible.  And funny.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Fly320s on June 05, 2016, 04:09:54 AM
My apologies. I saved it and posted a new link to it. Should work now (I hope).

Still no.  Shows the same Juno log in page.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Fly320s on June 05, 2016, 04:12:45 AM
Not in my backyard bathroom.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/02/transgender-aclu-operative-quits-daughters-intimidated/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Tuco on June 05, 2016, 12:02:35 PM
Across the country, like minded men can confound this nonsense by stepping up and owning their stereotype.

It starts by drinking an extra (favorite beverage).
Then step into the first available stall in the other-gendered latrine
Do not lift the seat.
Take a step back.
Let it whip around like a loose firehose.
And finally, the critical step,
Lift the seat with toe of boot before leaving.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Fly320s on June 05, 2016, 01:20:32 PM
Across the country, like minded men can confound this nonsense by stepping up and owning their stereotype.

It starts by drinking an extra (favorite beverage).
Then step into the first available stall in the other-gendered latrine
Do not lift the seat.
Take a step back.
Let it whip around like a loose firehose.
And finally, the critical step,
Lift the seat with toe of boot before leaving.


Civil disobedience?  >:D

Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 05, 2016, 06:30:14 PM
Still no.  Shows the same Juno log in page.

Go back to my first post. The link is now to Photobucket. It should just show up for you.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 05, 2016, 06:37:23 PM
Not in my backyard bathroom.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/02/transgender-aclu-operative-quits-daughters-intimidated/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Quote
As a result, it is now an offense in Washington State to ask a man in a woman’s bathroom if he thinks he is male or female. Similarly, Obama and gay advocacy groups have slammed a popular compromise North Carolina law, dubbed HB2, because it requires people to undergo medical procedures before they can use a bathroom reserved for the opposite sex.

Translation: The NC law requires people to be the sex/gender they claim to be before they choose which restroom to use. If a "self-identified" she is a she, there's no problem with her using the "she" restroom. Renee Richards had the surgery -- she's a she. Bruce Jenner has not ha the surgery -- as far as I'm concerned he's a he, who happens to be a transvestite.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 05, 2016, 06:38:58 PM
Civil disobedience?  >:D

You consider that "civil"?
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: cordex on June 05, 2016, 06:50:17 PM
You consider that "civil"?
Not really disobedient either. "Rude, gender-fluid, passive-aggressive obedience" maybe.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: bedlamite on June 05, 2016, 07:06:17 PM
http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2016/05/25/you-are-what-you-say-you-are-n2167422 (http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2016/05/25/you-are-what-you-say-you-are-n2167422)
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 05, 2016, 11:08:39 PM
S'posin' I was to self-identify as, say, the President of the United States. Do you think Mr. Obama would instruct the Secret Service to allow me the use of the Oval Office? If not, would the ACLU take up my case and help me sue the .gov for discrimination?
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: makattak on June 06, 2016, 09:22:32 AM
S'posin' I was to self-identify as, say, the President of the United States. Do you think Mr. Obama would instruct the Secret Service to allow me the use of the Oval Office? If not, would the ACLU take up my case and help me sue the .gov for discrimination?

As I've been told, the only important issue for how you self-identify is how well you can pull it off. So, if you identify as the POTUS, you just need a secret security detail to appear to be such and then you are.

So, get a bunch of friends in dark suits and sunglasses, and you're set.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: grampster on June 06, 2016, 09:33:05 AM
http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2016/05/25/you-are-what-you-say-you-are-n2167422 (http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2016/05/25/you-are-what-you-say-you-are-n2167422)


Sort of lends ammo to the old adage that in America you can be anything you want.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: brimic on June 06, 2016, 12:02:48 PM
Across the country, like minded men can confound this nonsense by stepping up and owning their stereotype.

It starts by drinking an extra (favorite beverage).
Then step into the first available stall in the other-gendered latrine
Do not lift the seat.
Take a step back.
Let it whip around like a loose firehose.
And finally, the critical step,
Lift the seat with toe of boot before leaving.



Except you don't want women in the men's bathrooms- they tend to crap on the seat.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: KD5NRH on June 06, 2016, 12:11:04 PM
Except you don't want women in the men's bathrooms- they tend to crap on the seat.

And miss the trash can with their feminine hygiene products.

Spending a couple summers as a janitor pretty much kills any thought you might have had about women being delicate flowers.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 06, 2016, 12:34:57 PM
Spending a couple summers as a janitor pretty much kills any thought you might have had about women being delicate flowers.

Standing in a checkout line at Wal-Mart will do that for you.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: grampster on June 06, 2016, 12:38:47 PM
Swmbo says you better hope women don't start using the Men's Room because women are pigs.  Nearly every women's bathroom she has gone into is a pig sty, she says.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: KD5NRH on June 06, 2016, 12:51:28 PM
Standing in a checkout line at Wal-Mart will do that for you.

I meant even the ones that don't appear to be scratching their balls in public.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Angel Eyes on June 06, 2016, 06:43:40 PM
Received from a friend by e-mail:

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi39.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fe193%2FAguilaBlanca%2FMiscellaneous%2FProblem_solved_zpspfznca94.jpg&hash=799095c607fe0bdeb64c165832be629932288ad7)

(https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13082782_1602510846462946_1813363809635177714_n.jpg?oh=e46aba6add05730980c4cb7c22ef2964&oe=57C469C2)
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Firethorn on June 06, 2016, 07:51:29 PM
(https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13082782_1602510846462946_1813363809635177714_n.jpg?oh=e46aba6add05730980c4cb7c22ef2964&oe=57C469C2)


Okay, I'll admit to cracking up with that one.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: MechAg94 on June 06, 2016, 07:59:29 PM
(https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13082782_1602510846462946_1813363809635177714_n.jpg?oh=e46aba6add05730980c4cb7c22ef2964&oe=57C469C2)

Wouldn't the Decepticon logo be more appropriate considering the subject matter?
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 06, 2016, 08:05:20 PM
Wouldn't the Decepticon logo be more appropriate considering the subject matter?


Correct. Also, the text above it needs a comma.


(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/custom_covers/200x150/496381258868292914_1400110202.jpg)
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: lee n. field on June 07, 2016, 10:06:30 PM
I'm trying to think how a large school district (like Houston ISD) could subvert this.  Announce that to be in compliance with the new Obama bathroom policy, anyone can now pee wherever they want.  >:D

Bushes on the playground.   

Hey, for a guy, the world is your urinal!


Quote
 Replace the "boys" and "girls" signs with ones that just say "toilet", and have buckets in the corners of the classrooms, in case someone takes "wherever" literally (and encourage them to do so.)  Blame the feds for the whole mess when the lynch mob shows up at the next school board meeting.

I don't think I quite have it right yet...
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: HeroHog on June 08, 2016, 08:16:23 PM
Bushes on the playground.  

Hey, for a guy, the world is your urinal!

The gals too. It's just that taking a quick pee can be a tad bit more difficult depending on attire, then there's this: http://www.wikihow.com/Urinate-Standing-Up-as-a-Female
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: MechAg94 on June 08, 2016, 09:28:18 PM

Correct. Also, the text above it needs a comma.


(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/custom_covers/200x150/496381258868292914_1400110202.jpg)
Did they forget a comma or use THERE instead of THEIR?   =)
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: French G. on June 08, 2016, 09:31:53 PM
If we ever go back to running our short track regularly I will have a LBGTBBQWTF friendly restroom. Third porta John, see if I can sell the local transmission shop ad space on the door.

Women's bathrooms. Eh, yuck. Used to have to enter one used by 150 women as part of firefighting duties. Burnt an OBA canister down every time, glorious fresh air. Used to have to send mixed gender duty crews to clean some too. Horror stories.
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: Angel Eyes on June 08, 2016, 11:55:42 PM
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1156.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp569%2Fjackstraw4449%2FIMG_0884_zpsdflskr2z.jpg&hash=f5051a98e36d22406d2dae46f46566a4717180af) (http://s1156.photobucket.com/user/jackstraw4449/media/IMG_0884_zpsdflskr2z.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Bathrooms again.
Post by: HeroHog on June 09, 2016, 12:29:58 AM
If we ever go back to running our short track regularly I will have a LBGTBBQWTF friendly restroom.

Or as Steven Crowder over at Louder With Crowder says "LGBTQAAIP with a silent seven." (LGBTQAAIP actually IS the accepted version, at least it was last week)