By poll-data it's a just about a statistical 3-way tie in Utah between Trump (30%), McMullin (I) (29%), and Clinton (28%). Results will be interesting. I'm not voting for Clinton, I'm not voting for Trump.
I'm not 100% compatible with McMullin's views either, but it's a lot closer match for me than Johnson. In the meantime, I'll continue to smile and nod when one person tells me my vote is
really a vote for Clinton, while another tells me it's
really a vote for Trump.
As for "It's the Supreme Court, stupid!", that's far from a sure thing. This sums up some of my concern on that matter:
And Trump might, indeed, appoint someone better. Might. His list of potential Supreme Court nominees, released under duress in May, is promising, if hardly foolproof. But it is also provisional. There simply is no reason to believe that the same Trump who has contradicted himself on amnesty for illegal immigrants, abortion, NATO, and much else, will stick to his assurances on this. Recall that this is the same man who — in February — suggested nominating his sister, who once wrote a decision defending partial-birth abortion.
I'll acknowledge that a Clinton presidency guarantees a liberal court, and a Trump one is at least moderately
likely to be
less liberal. But it's just not enough for nose-holding to be sufficient to give him my vote.