Author Topic: Minimum effective blade length  (Read 8259 times)

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #25 on: July 17, 2009, 09:48:20 PM »
If it needs to be killed with a blade that is not a sword:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber_Mark_II



Now back in production:
http://www.gerbergear.com/index.php/product/id/316

Also, standard with a hole drilled in the butt for a lanyard, so you don't drop it when wrasslin' with the kitteh.

Barring that, a ka-bar type knife is a good idea.

Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #26 on: July 17, 2009, 09:59:41 PM »
Advice I've heard:

They will stalk and attack you from behind. Wear a mask with a face on it on the back of your head.

I wouldn't want to be flailing a knife around with a cat on my back.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 10:03:04 PM by brimic »
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

Ron

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,881
  • Like a tree planted by the rivers of water
    • What I believe ...
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #27 on: July 17, 2009, 10:15:47 PM »
You're going to try to win a knife fight with a giant wild cat?

Good luck with that.

There was a story out of California about a retired guy who was jumped by a cat. His wife kept stabbing the cat with a pen and it eventually high tailed it out of there.

If I'm three days from a trailhead and get jumped I want to have a chance and I want to inflict as much hurt with each thrust of the blade as possible. If I only get one good jab I want it to be deep enough to create maximum damage.

Wearing a backpack it may not get a chance to snap my neck right away. My Leatherman Blast is not up to the task and is usually in my top cap. As far as the mask is concerned I actually though about doing something like that on the back of the pack.

I guess the question really is this...is a five inch blade long enough to reach the vitals on a big cat?

Just so you guys don't think I'm nuts or maybe you still will, lol. There is a place I go called the Gila Wilderness that is in southern New Mexico. I've been looking at the maps and would like to do an east to west traverse of the whole area. This would be a week to ten days unsupported backpacking through big cat country. If I can't get any of my regular crew to go I am considering a solo trek.

The question is hypothetical but the reality is there are some big cats where I'm going.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 10:21:05 PM by Ron »
For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity, that they may be without excuse. Because knowing God, they didn’t glorify him as God, and didn’t give thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,642
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #28 on: July 17, 2009, 10:32:17 PM »
You're going to try to win a knife fight with a giant wild cat?

Good luck with that.
Carl Akeley finished off a wounded leopard with his bare hands. (Of course, afterwards, he looked sort of like a man who'd wrestled a running lawnmower.)

Harry Wolhuter stabbed a man-eating lion (African type!) to death with a knife while being dragged away by the cat. His belt knife was ". . . an ordinary butcher-type "sticking" knife, with a six inch cutting edge and no quillion." (See Death in the Silent Places by Peter Hathaway Capstick.)
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

Jim147

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,595
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #29 on: July 17, 2009, 11:21:42 PM »
The odds of being attacked are small. But the odds of living through it are even smaller.

If I had to carry a knife for the situation you describe I would want something in the four to six inch range. A shorter knife will draw quicker and work in a tighter space. Don't worry about hitting the vitals. You need to hurt it. QUICKLY.
I think your best bet would be to have a friend along. But whatever you do make sure you put your weapon  somewhere that you can quickly reach with whatever hand is free while on the ground fending off a hungry attacker. (That puts a new twist on tactical training.)

jim
Sometimes we carry more weight then we owe.
And sometimes goes on and on and on.

BAH-WEEP-GRAAAGHNAH WHEEP NI-NI BONG

S. Williamson

  • formerly Dionysusigma
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,034
  • It's not the years, it's the mileage.
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #30 on: July 17, 2009, 11:42:54 PM »


 :laugh:
Quote
"The chances of finding out what's really going on are so remote, the only thing to do is hang the sense of it and keep yourself occupied. I'd far rather be happy than right any day."
"And are you?"
"No, that's where it all falls apart I'm afraid. Pity, it sounds like quite a nice lifestyle otherwise."
-Douglas Adams

Ryan in Maine

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #31 on: July 17, 2009, 11:48:00 PM »
I would want at least a 4" blade to go through their muscle.

Buck Kalinga Pro - http://www.agrussell.com/product.asp?pn=BU406&bhcd2=1247887480
4-7/8" blade. Good grip. Very easy to slash or stab with.

Ontario Shank - http://www.knifecenter.com/kc_new/store_detail.html?s=ON9410TCH
6-1/2" blade. Good grip, even with bloody hands. Can penetrate a mountain lion at any point on their body.

Ontario RAK - http://www.knifecenter.com/kc_new/store_detail.html?s=ON9414TCHS
6" blade. Good grip, even with bloody hands. Very easy to slash or stab with. Skull crusher.

Just find a knife you like with a decent steel. I tried to list knives that won't break the bank. Really though, just make sure you don't get anything that will slip out of your hand when it gets bloody. If you don't have confidence in a 4" blade then get something longer. Don't get something too long that you can't slip between you and a mountain lion while it's trying to pin you down. Etc.

Minimum effective blade length? Probably 4". It's all about shot placement.  :lol:

Harold Tuttle

  • Professor Chromedome
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,069
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #32 on: July 17, 2009, 11:57:10 PM »
the Khukuri is blessed +4 against cat & bear attack

Quote
big cats where I'm going
According to some of my buddies, Jaguars
"The true mad scientist does not make public appearances! He does not wear the "Hello, my name is.." badge!
He strikes from below like a viper or on high like a penny dropped from the tallest building around!
He only has one purpose--Do bad things to good people! Mit science! What good is science if no one gets hurt?!"

Ron

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,881
  • Like a tree planted by the rivers of water
    • What I believe ...
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #33 on: July 18, 2009, 12:02:47 AM »
the Khukuri is blessed +4 against cat & bear attack
According to some of my buddies, Jaguars


They shot one to collar down in New Mexico and IIRC they hit it with too large a dose and killed it.

Just my luck to be killed and eaten by a cat that supposedly doesn't even have a breeding population in the states  :laugh: 
For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity, that they may be without excuse. Because knowing God, they didn’t glorify him as God, and didn’t give thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

detritus

  • New Member
  • Posts: 14
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #34 on: July 18, 2009, 01:23:50 AM »
for the short time in my own slightly younger days (13 years ago now) when i would occasionaly go camping or hiking in areas where i felt the need to carry something more than a pocket knife, i carried one of three knives.  any of which would have met the blade length criteria you mentioned (all had 4"+).

My father's old Case drop point hunter similar to http://www.smkw.com/webapp/eCommerce/product.jsp?Mode=Brand&Brand=23&CatalogName=&PriceStart=&PriceEnd=&Feature=&Cat=&filter=&SearchText=hunter&list=50&SKU=CA518

a standard and stereotypical Ka-Bar fighting knife

And my favorite a Camillus "air force survival" (same thing by Ontario: http://www.smkw.com/webapp/eCommerce/product.jsp?filter=&PriceEnd=&order=Default&CatalogName=&range=51&list=50&Feature=&SearchText=&Cat=&Mode=Brand&Brand=84&PriceStart=&SKU=Q499 )

The major reason I liked the last one best was that I found the UNpolished stacked leather grip was easier to hold on to when my hands were wet, muddy, etc, the polished leather/sealed leather grips of the other two would occasionally get slippery on me (the case being most prone) and I had less confidence that in them for this reason. 

I also found the length of the standard Ka-Bar to be a little much, and the smaller survival knife much handier.
Unfortunately I left it in the garage over the summer a few years back and the local environment pretty much reclaimed it, or at least made it unsalvageable (grip had started to rot badly)

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #35 on: August 06, 2009, 02:46:19 PM »
Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Ex-MA Hole

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,976
    • The Brown Bomber
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #36 on: August 06, 2009, 03:23:49 PM »
Tactical hatchet?

Fusion by SOG....
One day at a time.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #37 on: August 06, 2009, 03:48:10 PM »
Tactical hatchet?

Fusion by SOG....

I came really close to buying the SOG Tomahawk, but I couldn't figure out a use for it, figured in the end I'd either cut myself or really piss my wife off with it.

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

SADShooter

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,242
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #38 on: August 06, 2009, 03:52:45 PM »
jfruser:

Thanks for the heads up on the MKII. I was enamored of it during my teen action/adventure pulp phase. Might have to get one on principle, even though I've learned more about blades and it's no longer the be all, end all.

SADShooter
"Ah, is there any wine so sweet and intoxicating as the tears of a hippie?"-Tamara, View From the Porch

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,973
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #39 on: August 06, 2009, 05:35:30 PM »
Ron:

Lots of options given here.

One last suggestion:  Pay close attention to the sheath.  For your intended use, I would not suggest an active retention system on the sheath such as a snap.  A friction sheath, either leather or kydex would be best.  Hand on hilt and pull.

Also, consider a rafter's or sailor's knife in a chest rig as well as your big knife.  If you really want to be able to quickly be able to combat a wild animal, you need to get the pack off NOW without looking weak and inviting an attack.  A rafter's knife can be used to quickly cut the straps of your pack and dump it on the ground out of your way.

Or... just wait for park carry to kick into effect. =D
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #40 on: August 06, 2009, 05:46:14 PM »
  If you really want to be able to quickly be able to combat a wild animal, you need to get the pack off NOW without looking weak and inviting an attack. 

You want to leave the pack on if attacked, gives you protection if you have to lie head down and play dead. i.e. Grizzly attack.

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Ron

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,881
  • Like a tree planted by the rivers of water
    • What I believe ...
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #41 on: August 06, 2009, 06:43:19 PM »
Cut the straps on my pack! never!  :laugh:

Charby is correct though, it will offer some protection especially if it is an attack as a warning and not an attack to eat me.

Thanks for all the good suggestions, still mulling over my options.
For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity, that they may be without excuse. Because knowing God, they didn’t glorify him as God, and didn’t give thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

86thecat

  • New Member
  • Posts: 39
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #42 on: August 07, 2009, 01:15:47 AM »
Ko-Katana



Yes,I have carried one in the woods, it's about the smallest that makes me comfortable.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2009, 01:20:44 AM by 86thecat »

Uncle Bubba

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 586
  • Billy Fish
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #43 on: August 07, 2009, 01:46:03 AM »
If it needs to be killed with a blade that is not a sword:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber_Mark_II



Now back in production:
http://www.gerbergear.com/index.php/product/id/316

Also, standard with a hole drilled in the butt for a lanyard, so you don't drop it when wrasslin' with the kitteh.

Barring that, a ka-bar type knife is a good idea.



I was on the point of recommending that very knife when I saw your post.


*heavy sigh* I had a MKII my friends bought as a going-away present just before I went to Infantry School. I kept it with my gear and carried it in the field in Germany until the powers-that-were took it away from me and made me stash it in the arms room. During REFORGER 82 an E-5 from 3rd ID threatened to shoot me - his M-16 had a blank round jammed into the barrel - so I pulled the knife and told him to make his shot count. He ran away and later told an MP who passed by that I'd threatened him for no reason. Being that I was an E-2, his story flew and mine didn't. When I left Germany the next year the unit was in the field. I was told that my knife had been secured in the S-2 shop and I couldn't get it. Being young and stupid I believed them. I hope whoever got it tripped and fell on it and bled out...slowly.



It's a strange world. Some people get rich and others eat *expletive deleted*it and die. Dr. Hunter S. Thompson

Quote from: Fly320s
But, generally speaking, people are idiots outside their own personal sphere.

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,179
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: Minimum effective blade length
« Reply #44 on: August 07, 2009, 01:51:46 AM »
the mask on the back of the head used to be effective but
after the Tigers in India figured it out news spread quickly throughout the cat kingdom.
It no longer works.
I'd say about any really good fighting knife will do, I've looked into
this debate for 15 years now. ( I had a nightmare/premonition I would be killed by a cougar )
It seems cats prefer quick deaths and no fighting and if injured give up the fight quickly. ...
However, the cat that attacks you may not be keeping up with the latest research.
Also, if you combine Jag's with cougars and ignore borders like Canada and Mexico, then lions are a bigger problem then we have been led to believe.

Your best bet is probably having company of some sort and all of you have weapons of some kind handy.
Far more likely that a human would be your main problem but...heck...weapons are effective against them too.
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."