Read carefully and you'll see that desertion rates are actually DOWN, but they spin it to look like the opposite.
Anyone else notice that they don't bother to tell the real story (desertion is down considerably in recent years) until the end of the article? The story creats the impression that soldiers are deserting in droves in protest over the Iraq war, yet the facts support exactly the opposite conclusion.
Do the reporters really not believe that we're smart enough to see through this crap?
Which article are you guys reading? I clicked the link, and the very first paragraph says this:
At least 8,000 members of the all-volunteer U.S. military have deserted since the Iraq war began, Pentagon records show, although the overall desertion rate has plunged since the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001.