Author Topic: Lockerbie Bomber - US Would Have Perferred Freedom to Libya  (Read 1191 times)

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,114
  • I'm an Extremist!
Interesting new development. If I'm not mistaken, Schumer was recently scolding the UK for the decision to release. I wonder how he and the White House will square this?

I suppose one could argue that release in Scotland would allow for monitoring, which release in Libya does not.

----------------
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/25/obama-administration-reportedly-backed-lockerbie-release-transfer-libyan-prison/


White House Reportedly Preferred Scotland to Libya for Released Lockerbie Bomber

The Obama administration reportedly told Scottish officials last August that, although it opposed any release of the Lockerbie bomber, it would rather see him released in Scotland than transferred to a Libyan prison.
fox news

The Obama administration told Scottish officials last August that, although it opposed any release of the Lockerbie bomber, it would rather see him released in Scotland than transferred to a Libyan prison, according to a secret memo obtained by The Sunday Times in London.

The publication of the memo's contents comes just days after President Obama, at a press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron, said "all of us ... were surprised, disappointed and angry" by the Scottish government's decision to free Abdel Baset al-Megrahi last year.

Al-Megrahi's release last year was approved based on "compassionate" grounds, on the belief that he had months left to live. The case has sparked renewed controversy recently on reports that al-Megrahi may survive much longer.

According to The Sunday Times report, the Obama administration weighed in last year in the memo sent by Richard LeBaron, deputy head of the U.S. Embassy in London, to Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond and other justice officials. In the memo, dated Aug. 12, LeBaron argued against the release.

"Nevertheless, if Scottish authorities come to the conclusion that Megrahi must be released from Scottish custody, the US position is that conditional release on compassionate grounds would be a far preferable alternative to prisoner transfer, which we strongly oppose," the memo reportedly said.

LeBaron pushed for the Scottish government to require al-Megrahi to live in Scotland, though al-Megrahi was ultimately returned to Libya.

According to The Sunday Times, Scottish officials viewed U.S. resistance to the release as "half-hearted." The Guardian reported on the existence of the memo last year, but the U.S. government reportedly has tried to keep its contents secret. The Sunday Times was the first to publish the memo's text.

Al-Megrahi was convicted in connection with the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am jet over Lockerbie, Scotland. The bombing killed 270 people, most of them American.

The release last year prompted outrage in the United States, where families of victims are still reeling from the tragedy. The controversy was stirred up again in recent weeks after a doctor said al-Megrahi could live another 10 years -- though the cancer-stricken convict was given just three months to live when he was released on compassionate grounds.

According to Britain's Daily Telegraph, Salmond on Sunday said the United States did not want al-Megrahi released. He clarified that the U.S. government was merely voicing a preference for "compassionate release" if the other option was a prisoner transfer to Libya.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: Lockerbie Bomber - US Would Have Perferred Freedom to Libya
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2010, 10:52:30 AM »
One more piece of "circumstantial evidence"... 

But don't expect the MSM to play this one up.
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Lockerbie Bomber - US Would Have Perferred Freedom to Libya
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2010, 02:13:43 PM »
Another added bonus for leaving him in Scotland:

No hero's welcome from his fellow Jihadis in Libya.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,006
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Lockerbie Bomber - US Would Have Perferred Freedom to Libya
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2010, 02:26:37 PM »
Not to mention having to eat Scottish food and live in Scottish weather for the rest of his life.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

BReilley

  • Just a frog in a pond.
  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 496
Re: Lockerbie Bomber - US Would Have Perferred Freedom to Libya
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2010, 03:53:42 PM »
I don't quite understand the outrage on this one.  I happen to agree that if they were dead-set on releasing the bastard, I would much prefer the Scots - who doubtless would ensure his death within 90 days - keep him than send him out to his home.

What's the issue?

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: Lockerbie Bomber - US Would Have Perferred Freedom to Libya
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2010, 11:44:26 PM »
"Compassion" has been profaned far, far too many times.  This takes it to the limit.  Compassion is not meant to be a form of noble suicide.

Then again, I don't think anyone believes this really has anything to do with compassion.
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.