Post by: wmenorr67 on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
Actor Matt Damon said a Sarah Palin presidency would be like "a really bad Disney movie."
"I think there's a really good chance Sarah Palin could become president, and I think that's a really scary thing," he told the Associated Press, referring to the Republican vice presidential nominee.
Damon suggested the odds are John McCain won't survive his first term.
"It's like a really bad Disney movie," he said. "The hockey mom, you know, 'Oh, I'm just a hockey mom'... and she's facing down [Russian] President Putin... It's totally absurd... It's a really terrifying possibility."
Damon also said he believes she was chosen for "political purposes."
Last month, the actor told Conde Nast Traveler he fears putting his foot in his mouth.
"For a lot of actors, our biggest fear is that we're going to start talking about things we don't fully understand and sound like idiots," he said. "In the long run, I'll do much more good if, when I open my mouth, I have something worth saying."
"I think there's a really good chance Sarah Palin could become president, and I think that's a really scary thing," he told the Associated Press, referring to the Republican vice presidential nominee.
Damon suggested the odds are John McCain won't survive his first term.
"It's like a really bad Disney movie," he said. "The hockey mom, you know, 'Oh, I'm just a hockey mom'... and she's facing down [Russian] President Putin... It's totally absurd... It's a really terrifying possibility."
Damon also said he believes she was chosen for "political purposes."
Last month, the actor told Conde Nast Traveler he fears putting his foot in his mouth.
"For a lot of actors, our biggest fear is that we're going to start talking about things we don't fully understand and sound like idiots," he said. "In the long run, I'll do much more good if, when I open my mouth, I have something worth saying."
Well looks like you need to try again.
Post by: MicroBalrog on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: xavier fremboe on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: red headed stranger on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: Lennyjoe on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: wmenorr67 on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I actually like the Boirne series. As for his political views, who gives a damn what he thinks.
The problem is too many sheep will baa along with "famous" people because they are "famous."
Post by: El Tejon on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
To further paraphrase Team America, it is his job as a celebrity to read newspapers and then tell us all what to think.
Matt Damon.
Post by: Tallpine on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
Damon also said he believes she was chosen for "political purposes."
Well, duh .....
Newsflash: politician makes choice based on "political purposes"
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'm not comfortable with the idea of Palin cracking lipstick jokes with Putin. Of course, all she'll have to do is take one look at his crucifix and she'll know that he's an honest man.
Post by: K Frame on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: ilbob on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
Damon also said he believes she was chosen for "political purposes."
Well, duh .....
Newsflash: politician makes choice based on "political purposes"
Post by: ilbob on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'm not comfortable with the idea of Palin cracking lipstick jokes with Putin.
But you would be comforatable with BHO facing off with Putin?
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
He has a point, even if it's not an especially original/insightful one.
I'm not comfortable with the idea of Palin cracking lipstick jokes with Putin. Of course, all she'll have to do is take one look at his crucifix and she'll know that he's an honest man.
I'm not comfortable with the idea of Palin cracking lipstick jokes with Putin. Of course, all she'll have to do is take one look at his crucifix and she'll know that he's an honest man.
Admittedly this is somewhat a problem of the Repub's own making (since they and Hillary attacked Obama with it), but I do wish people would realise that the vast majority of diplomatic contacts occur at levels below (in some cases far below) the head of state - a good Foriegn Secretary / FO (or Secretary of State, in your language) doing their job properly is far better than having a "knowledgeable on foriegn policy" PM / President, as history will attest.
Besides, one would have thought dealing with Putin would be remarkably easy - its not as if its not blatantly obvious what he is and what his aims are. A bigger test would be dealing with the weaselry at the EU and NATO.
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
but I do wish people would realise that the vast majority of diplomatic contacts occur at levels below (in some cases far below) the head of state - a good Foriegn Secretary / FO (or Secretary of State, in your language) doing their job properly is far better than having a "knowledgeable on foriegn policy" PM / President, as history will attest.
This is something that bears repeating, and something that didn't really hit home until I read Doug Feith's book, War and Decision, which touched on some of that. However, the President does play a major role in deciding what approaches we should make, and is a definite and substantial influence.
Besides, one would have thought dealing with Putin would be remarkably easy - its not as if its not blatantly obvious what he is and what his aims are. A bigger test would be dealing with the weaselry at the EU and NATO.
An interesting point to make, but I'm still more worried about the aggressive guy with access to a vast nuclear arsenal.
Post by: Manedwolf on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Besides, one would have thought dealing with Putin would be remarkably easy - its not as if its not blatantly obvious what he is and what his aims are. A bigger test would be dealing with the weaselry at the EU and NATO.
He has a nuclear arsenal that can destroy the world, and he'll put polonium in your tea.
Not really the nicest guy.
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Besides, one would have thought dealing with Putin would be remarkably easy - its not as if its not blatantly obvious what he is and what his aims are. A bigger test would be dealing with the weaselry at the EU and NATO.
He has a nuclear arsenal that can destroy the world, and he'll put polonium in your tea.
Not really the nicest guy.
No, but as I said, he is what he is and he is very likely to be treated accordingly. A bigger problem (for you in the US at least) are your "allies" and their self-important, self-righteous posturing.
Post by: longeyes on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
She has too many children IN wedlock. That bugs the hell out of them. And, yeah, she's a devout Christian, perish the thought.
She's a threat to their narcissistic lifestyle. Of course they aren't going to tell you the truth. Their lives are about "pretend."
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'm not comfortable with the idea of Palin cracking lipstick jokes with Putin. Of course, all she'll have to do is take one look at his crucifix and she'll know that he's an honest man.
Post by: MicroBalrog on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'm not comfortable with the idea of Palin cracking lipstick jokes with Putin. Of course, all she'll have to do is take one look at his crucifix and she'll know that he's an honest man.
A reference to GWB stating once he looked into Putin's eyes and knew he was an honest man, I think.
Post by: xavier fremboe on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: longeyes on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
A nationalistic Russia may inspire--not now, eventually--a more nationalistic America. There are many reasons why the U.S. and Russia are likely allies, not enemies.
Post by: Manedwolf on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Who says we will be enemies of Russia anyway?
A nationalistic Russia may inspire--not now, eventually--a more nationalistic America. There are many reasons why the U.S. and Russia are likely allies, not enemies.
A nationalistic Russia may inspire--not now, eventually--a more nationalistic America. There are many reasons why the U.S. and Russia are likely allies, not enemies.
Actually, Russia is allying with Venezuela. They just put bombers there for a joint exercise.
Putin is an evil man. Pure and simple.
Post by: MicroBalrog on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Who says we will be enemies of Russia anyway?
A nationalistic Russia may inspire--not now, eventually--a more nationalistic America. There are many reasons why the U.S. and Russia are likely allies, not enemies.
A nationalistic Russia may inspire--not now, eventually--a more nationalistic America. There are many reasons why the U.S. and Russia are likely allies, not enemies.
Dude.
There's Russian government propaganda put out that depicts America as Cthulhu. Literally.
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Who says we will be enemies of Russia anyway?
A nationalistic Russia may inspire--not now, eventually--a more nationalistic America. There are many reasons why the U.S. and Russia are likely allies, not enemies.
A nationalistic Russia may inspire--not now, eventually--a more nationalistic America. There are many reasons why the U.S. and Russia are likely allies, not enemies.
Dude.
There's Russian government propaganda put out that depicts America as Cthulhu. Literally.
Post by: The Annoyed Man on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
.
Post by: Angel Eyes on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Well, I'll be sure to ask him the next time I want an informed opinion on US politics. Also, I'll consult Julia Roberts for all my future medical problems, and Britney Spears for all my financial consulting .
.Next up: Alec Baldwin with important advice on anger management.
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: seeker_two on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Don't forget Mel Gibson for spiritual counseling.
isnt Gibson a Republican?
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I believe he follows the Alcoholic party.
Either that or the Death to Britain party... its sad, one would have thought he would have forgiven us for invading and occupying nearly every one of the countries he has filmed in / has family members from. Some people are just bitter, I guess.
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'm not comfortable with the idea of Palin cracking lipstick jokes with Putin. Of course, all she'll have to do is take one look at his crucifix and she'll know that he's an honest man.
A reference to GWB stating once he looked into Putin's eyes and knew he was an honest man, I think.
OK, but what does that have to do with a crucifix? I wasn't aware that Putin had pretenses of piety.
Nor do I understand the apparent implication that Palin is an air-head.
Again, I say
Post by: Marvin Dao on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
OK, but what does that have to do with a crucifix? I wasn't aware that Putin had pretenses of piety.
Nor do I understand the apparent implication that Palin is an air-head.
Again, I say
Nor do I understand the apparent implication that Palin is an air-head.
Again, I say
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200503/starobin
From outward signs at least, Putin is a religious man.
Post by: Wildalaska on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: Boomhauer on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Who's Matt damon?
Some hollywierd pretty boy who don't know jack.
But, but, but, HE'S FAMOUS!
Post by: Wildalaska on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
But, but, but, HE'S FAMOUS! rolleyes
So are the guys with pics hanging up in the Post Office and I don't pay attention to their opinions either *snark snark*
Post by: Waitone on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
To paraphrase the Blond Bomber, "Matt, shut up and act".
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
OK, but what does that have to do with a crucifix? I wasn't aware that Putin had pretenses of piety.
It was not just Putin's pretty eyes that convinced Bush of Putin's outstanding character. He made good note of the crucifix Putin wore, and how it assured him Putin was a trustworthy man.
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Now, does America's favorite community organizer come anywhere close to that pedigree?
And Joe Biden vs Putin?
That's scary.
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: MicroBalrog on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Look up Putin sometime. He's got some highly-advanced belt in some far-eastern martial art, highest level for a non-oriental, IIRC. This guy tranqs tigers during his vacations, and invades small former Soviet bloc nations whenever he's bored. He sends bombers and battleships into our hemisphere whenever he pleases. He's ex-KGB. I believe he once threatened to castrate reporters.
Now, does America's favorite community organizer come anywhere close to that pedigree?
And Joe Biden vs Putin?
That's scary.
Now, does America's favorite community organizer come anywhere close to that pedigree?
And Joe Biden vs Putin?
That's scary.
Its Judo. He also hunts and fishes.
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Look up Putin sometime. He's got some highly-advanced belt in some far-eastern martial art, highest level for a non-oriental, IIRC. This guy tranqs tigers during his vacations, and invades small former Soviet bloc nations whenever he's bored. He sends bombers and battleships into our hemisphere whenever he pleases. He's ex-KGB. I believe he once threatened to castrate reporters.
Now, does America's favorite community organizer come anywhere close to that pedigree?
And Joe Biden vs Putin?
That's scary.
Now, does America's favorite community organizer come anywhere close to that pedigree?
And Joe Biden vs Putin?
That's scary.
If Putin were American, he would probably be quite popular in some circles here
Post by: MicroBalrog on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
(c) Putin 2006
Post by: Iain on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Who's Matt damon?
Who's WildAlaska?
Post by: onebigelf on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
John
Post by: longeyes on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Putin's a thug, but he loves Russia.
We have a lot of "nice" people who don't much love America.
Post by: seeker_two on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Who's John Galt?
Post by: Boomhauer on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Do we turn now to ACTORS for political opinion? What amazes me is that an actor's views are considered relevant or important. Next thing you know we'll be turning to... reporters.
John
John
The reporters already tell us what to think.
Post by: Scout26 on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Who's John Galt?
Welcome back Ken ! Did you bring Spiff with you ??
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Regarding my Russia and America as future allies remark, check back in ten years.
Putin's a thug, but he loves Russia.
We have a lot of "nice" people who don't much love America.
Putin's a thug, but he loves Russia.
We have a lot of "nice" people who don't much love America.
This is perhaps true - certainly the Russian Foriegn Minister Sergei Lavrov has managed to brighten my day today with this report of his dressing-down of our David Miliband, our Blairite Foriegn Secretary:
Quote
One unconfirmed report suggested that Mr Lavrov said: "Who are you to f------ lecture me?"
He also asked Mr Miliband in equally blunt terms whether he knew anything of Russia's history.
He also asked Mr Miliband in equally blunt terms whether he knew anything of Russia's history.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/2667840/David-Miliband-subjected-to-F-word-tirade-from-Russian-foreign-minister.html
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'm quite glad none of our candidates share Putin's resume. I want a thug president no more than I want a "hockey mom".
OK, come on. What is this big, burning problem you have with Palin's "hockey mom" image? You're not being unduly influenced by marketing slogans, I hope.
Post by: Wildalaska on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
Welcome back Ken ! Did you bring Spiff with you ?? grin
Spiffs in love, I get to see him once a month and he is all calf eyed and moonstruck
Post by: ArfinGreebly on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'll take the "moose shooter" hockey mom, thanks.
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
OK, come on. What is this big, burning problem you have with Palin's "hockey mom" image? You're not being unduly influenced by marketing slogans, I hope.
Aside from it being an idiotic, meaningless, ambiguous term? I don't want a "hockey mom" to have access to nuclear weapons. I don't want a "hockey mom" to lead the most powerful nation in the world. I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman. (Or stateswoman.) What makes it worse is that she calls herself a hockey mom. A sense of humor is great in a politician, but come on, if you're going to represent the people of the United States you should at least take yourself seriously.
"Hockey mom". Good lord. I'm going to go vomit.
Post by: ArfinGreebly on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
A sense of humor is great in a politician, but come on, if you're going to represent the people of the United States you should at least take yourself seriously.
Nah.We have too many arrogant, self-important, affectedly-serious, throat-clearing, eyglass-adjusting, down-the-nose-scowling, affronted, stentorian uber-menschen in Washington DC as it is.
I want her to take the CONSTITUTION seriously.
If she wants to roll on the White House lawn with her dog and kids, I'm good with that.
Post by: Gowen on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
I'm gonna laugh my ass rear off when all these 'woman follows man' evangelicals get Palin as POTUS. 
No, that super secret group that orders Dick Cheney to boss GWB around is who will be pulling the strings. She is too stupid to do it for herself, like GWB.
Post by: longeyes on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
Aside from it being an idiotic, meaningless, ambiguous term? I don't want a "hockey mom" to have access to nuclear weapons. I don't want a "hockey mom" to lead the most powerful nation in the world. I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman. (Or stateswoman.) What makes it worse is that she calls herself a hockey mom. A sense of humor is great in a politician, but come on, if you're going to represent the people of the United States you should at least take yourself seriously.
"Hockey mom". Good lord. I'm going to go vomit.
"Hockey mom". Good lord. I'm going to go vomit.
"Expertise" is more often than not a myth when it comes to foreign policy. Madeleine Allbright? Like her "expertise?" And I hate to say this, but Condi Rice, with her advanced specialty in Russian Stuff, didn't see "Georgia" coming or deflect it, nor does she seem to be doing much good in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian problem. Palin can read up on what's happening abroad, and of course she'll get briefed by U.S. intell. In the end it's about animal cunning and intuitive risk-taking. You don't get that in grad school.
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
OK, come on. What is this big, burning problem you have with Palin's "hockey mom" image? You're not being unduly influenced by marketing slogans, I hope.
Aside from it being an idiotic, meaningless, ambiguous term? I don't want a "hockey mom" to have access to nuclear weapons. I don't want a "hockey mom" to lead the most powerful nation in the world. I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman. (Or stateswoman.) What makes it worse is that she calls herself a hockey mom. A sense of humor is great in a politician, but come on, if you're going to represent the people of the United States you should at least take yourself seriously.
"Hockey mom". Good lord. I'm going to go vomit.
Well, after a rant like that, certainly no one will take you seriously.
I would ask you, if Palin has not proven herself as a statesman, then who has. But of course no one would be interested in your answer.
Post by: Dntsycnt on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Post by: dogmush on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman. (Or stateswoman.)
Me too.
However our choices are McCain or Obama, So I'll just have to go for whoever is least damaging to the Constitution.
Post by: roo_ster on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
It's how the game is played.
If democracy is a 'game' to you, maybe you don't deserve it anymore. Maybe its overstayed its welcome.
Lighten up, Francis.
fistful is describing some of the rules & means by which successful policritters get elected.
If you have difficulty with the use of humor and/or colloquialisms, there are plenty of places on the web for the humor-impaired to congregate and stoke their indignation.
Post by: MicroBalrog on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
If democracy is a 'game' to you, maybe you don't deserve it anymore. Maybe its overstayed its welcome.
Read Johann Huizinga. There are elements of a 'game' in practically every major human activity.
That something is a game doesn't mean it's not important.
Post by: Ben on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
I don't want a "hockey mom" to have access to nuclear weapons.
I want someone who knows how to use AOL and who is cognizant of the strategic importance of arugula prices to have access to nuclear weapons. I won't feel safe until then.
Post by: Matthew Carberry on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Regarding my Russia and America as future allies remark, check back in ten years.
Putin's a thug, but he loves Russia.
We have a lot of "nice" people who don't much love America.
Putin's a thug, but he loves Russia.
We have a lot of "nice" people who don't much love America.
This is perhaps true - certainly the Russian Foriegn Minister Sergei Lavrov has managed to brighten my day today with this report of his dressing-down of our David Miliband, our Blairite Foriegn Secretary:
Quote
One unconfirmed report suggested that Mr Lavrov said: "Who are you to f------ lecture me?"
He also asked Mr Miliband in equally blunt terms whether he knew anything of Russia's history.
He also asked Mr Miliband in equally blunt terms whether he knew anything of Russia's history.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/2667840/David-Miliband-subjected-to-F-word-tirade-from-Russian-foreign-minister.html
Ironically, that's the kind of person you can deal with, once you get your terms and positions defined. This mealy-mouthed diplo-speak, such as that used in the recent cease-fire, that seeks to avoid making demands lends itself to deliberate or accidental misunderstanding.
I'm not saying you need be blunt or rude in public, but when real negotiations are going on, there's nothing wrong with letting your position and firmness be clearly displayed. Even if it means you use a little vulgarity.
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Regarding my Russia and America as future allies remark, check back in ten years.
Putin's a thug, but he loves Russia.
We have a lot of "nice" people who don't much love America.
Putin's a thug, but he loves Russia.
We have a lot of "nice" people who don't much love America.
This is perhaps true - certainly the Russian Foriegn Minister Sergei Lavrov has managed to brighten my day today with this report of his dressing-down of our David Miliband, our Blairite Foriegn Secretary:
Quote
One unconfirmed report suggested that Mr Lavrov said: "Who are you to f------ lecture me?"
He also asked Mr Miliband in equally blunt terms whether he knew anything of Russia's history.
He also asked Mr Miliband in equally blunt terms whether he knew anything of Russia's history.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/2667840/David-Miliband-subjected-to-F-word-tirade-from-Russian-foreign-minister.html
Ironically, that's the kind of person you can deal with, once you get your terms and positions defined. This mealy-mouthed diplo-speak, such as that used in the recent cease-fire, that seeks to avoid making demands lends itself to deliberate or accidental misunderstanding.
I'm not saying you need be blunt or rude in public, but when real negotiations are going on, there's nothing wrong with letting your position and firmness be clearly displayed. Even if it means you use a little vulgarity.
A Cato for our times!
Post by: divemedic on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman.
When was the last time we had one of those as President? The last 100 years, and their previous occupations: (How is Palin any less qualified that the Presidents below?)
GW Bush Governor of Texas
Clinton Governor of Arkansas
GHW Bush Director of CIA (then Vice President), Ambassador to the UN under Nixon, Oil Millionaire
Reagan Governor of California (actor before that)
Carter Governor of Georgia (farmer before that)
Ford Congressman
Nixon Lawyer, Congressman
LBJ Congressman
JFK Congressman
Eisenhower Military
Truman Congressman
FDR Governor
Hoover Mining engineer
Coolidge Governor, Lawyer before that
Harding Congressman
Wilson Governor of New Jersey
Taft, Lawyer
Post by: Sergeant Bob on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman.
When was the last time we had one of those as President? The last 100 years, and their previous occupations: (How is Palin any less qualified that the Presidents below?)
GW Bush Governor of Texas
Clinton Governor of Arkansas
GHW Bush Director of CIA (then Vice President), Ambassador to the UN under Nixon, Oil Millionaire
Reagan Governor of California (actor before that)
Carter Governor of Georgia (farmer before that)
Ford Congressman
Nixon Lawyer, Congressman
LBJ Congressman
JFK Congressman
Eisenhower Military
Truman Congressman
FDR Governor
Hoover Mining engineer
Coolidge Governor, Lawyer before that
Harding Congressman
Wilson Governor of New Jersey
Taft, Lawyer
I don't know. Does she have any acting experience?
Post by: agricola on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman.
When was the last time we had one of those as President? The last 100 years, and their previous occupations: (How is Palin any less qualified that the Presidents below?)
GW Bush Governor of Texas
Clinton Governor of Arkansas
GHW Bush Director of CIA (then Vice President), Ambassador to the UN under Nixon, Oil Millionaire
Reagan Governor of California (actor before that)
Carter Governor of Georgia (farmer before that)
Ford Congressman
Nixon Lawyer, Congressman
LBJ Congressman
JFK Congressman
Eisenhower Military
Truman Congressman
FDR Governor
Hoover Mining engineer
Coolidge Governor, Lawyer before that
Harding Congressman
Wilson Governor of New Jersey
Taft, Lawyer
I don't know. Does she have any acting experience?
She was a sports reporter for a bit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiOIEGM7XEs
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsKI77iaF8k&feature=related
Watch out, there was a link on there that was NSFW.
Post by: Perd Hapley on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
Quote
I want an informed, intelligent, experienced statesman.
When was the last time we had one of those as President? The last 100 years, and their previous occupations: (How is Palin any less qualified that the Presidents below?)
(Llist)
Some of those guys may have been more qualified than Palin, but that doesn't make them "statesmen." Palin has shown herself to be a statesman, because she has acted in the interest of her constituents, and dramatically so, rather than merely seeking power and prestige. Witness her hocking the gubernatorial assets to help balance the budget.
Post by: Matthew Carberry on March 03, 2005, 10:18:52 PM
She said her oath as Governor required her to do so.
I want people of faith, or lack thereof, who put the Constitution, State or Federal, and their oaths to support and defend the same, ahead of their own beliefs when it comes to actions versus talk.
Palin has proven that.
Her religious beliefs have thus been shown to be a non-factor in her actual actions in power.
The "scary evangelical" talking point is just so much wind.