Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: Perd Hapley on October 20, 2015, 10:33:41 PM

Title: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Perd Hapley on October 20, 2015, 10:33:41 PM

WARNING: Content may induce vomiting, rage-blindness, or debilitating laughter.
















http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/opinion/guest-column/2015/10/09/obamas-legacy-guns-ban/73682284/

Quote
I urge President Obama to ban firearm possession in America. He is the president of the United States. He can change the country. He can do it today. I believe in him.

During his 2008 presidential campaign, my two daughters, partner, and I ate every meal in our house on Obama placemats. We bought these at our local supermarket, plastic-coated, plate-sized paper rectangles with an image of his face framed by colors of the flag. While politically minded, I am not overly patriotic, so this mealtime ritual of American allegiance was odd for me. Still, we looked at the image of his face each day and we believed that he really could be the change in America.

There's much more unthink in the article, if you can stomach it. This critter is exactly what you expect her to be.  :facepalm:


And if your stomach is really strong...






(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.campaignforbrockport.com%2Fimages%2Ffaculty-lesavoy_13.jpg&hash=d9fc9156d7f678a9083eada383f3352a2b4e65a1)

Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Battle Monkey of Zardoz on October 20, 2015, 10:42:34 PM
Can also be used as a spay and neuter liberals / idiots poster.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: MechAg94 on October 20, 2015, 11:44:19 PM
It is fools like this that make me think the President will eventually become a dictatorship.  People like her can't seem to tell the difference and I am afraid they are multiplying.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: brimic on October 21, 2015, 11:42:50 AM
*makes note of name in 'in case of gun ban' address book*
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: seeker_two on October 21, 2015, 02:51:39 PM
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.rollingstone.com%2Fassets%2F1974%2Farticle%2Flily-and-all-the-funny-women-19741024%2F182929%2Flarge_rect%2F1422045848%2F1401x788-52728768.jpg&hash=cb1d6ff1d915ea8aab2e55bdb575da96eb9f1c93)

She grew up....
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Angel Eyes on October 21, 2015, 03:10:45 PM
It is fools like this that make me think the President will eventually become a dictatorship.  People like her can't seem to tell the difference and I am afraid they are multiplying.

They're fine with dictatorships as long as the dictator does what they want.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: grampster on October 21, 2015, 04:05:47 PM
She's another reason why I have a rapidly growing disdain for highly "edumacated" bi-peds.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: vaskidmark on October 21, 2015, 05:16:32 PM
1 - Your PhD will not allow you to write a prescription.  Therefore you are not a doctor - perhaps a professor at best.

2 - Even if you were a doctor, your training and accreditation and license do not allow you to practice outside your limits.  I'll let a proctologist tie off a tourniquet if my artery is spurting, and cover me to delay the onset of shock.  But I'll be darned if I'm letting him set my broken bone.

stay safe.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Jocassee on October 21, 2015, 09:42:19 PM
Even before googling the author's place of employment I knew she was a New York liberal. New York is full of women who talk and look exactly like that. It's scary.

Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: dm1333 on October 21, 2015, 09:43:27 PM
Quote
To establish gun control laws in America that will reduce high levels of male violence and usher in a culture of peace and civility.

 ;/  :lol:  =D  :O  and finally,  :rofl:
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Perd Hapley on October 21, 2015, 10:08:51 PM
"I hope you've enjoyed this meal I prepared for you, dear. As you know, it was entirely vegan and conflict-free. I'm so delighted that we can have a pleasant evening together. Why, since you had me destroy my firearms, I don't even hit you anymore!"
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Scout26 on October 21, 2015, 11:21:28 PM
1)  Ever notice that most of the rabid feminists and Pro-abortion zealots are women that you would not ever, no way, no how, want to mate with?
 
2)  (rabid, SJW type) Feminists have this belief that if only women were in charge and men reduced to servile positions then the world would be all magic unicorns and rainbows?   Yet take a social setting where two peopel are wearing the same Dress/Shirt/Tie/Skirt/Sweater/Shoes.  Men will laugh and joke about it while sharing a couple of beers and probably become lifelong friends.  The women will be all angry and upset with each other and ruin the event for pretty much all involved.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: HankB on October 22, 2015, 10:28:50 AM
1)  Ever notice that most of the rabid feminists and Pro-abortion zealots are women that you would not ever, no way, no how, want to mate with?

It goes beyond that, but . . . yep.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frlv.zcache.com%2Flips_that_touch_liquor_shall_not_touch_ours_poster-rcac468f1ae664718953394d9a2acdeb3_wfb_8byvr_512.jpg&hash=d68765966b6d747f44344ead9c4e6dfafdd6efc1)
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: grampster on October 22, 2015, 11:13:47 AM
Heh.  That photo would drive me to drink.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: roo_ster on October 22, 2015, 11:29:05 AM

WARNING: Content may induce vomiting, rage-blindness, or debilitating laughter.
















http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/opinion/guest-column/2015/10/09/obamas-legacy-guns-ban/73682284/

There's much more unthink in the article, if you can stomach it. This critter is exactly what you expect her to be.  :facepalm:


And if your stomach is really strong...






(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.campaignforbrockport.com%2Fimages%2Ffaculty-lesavoy_13.jpg&hash=d9fc9156d7f678a9083eada383f3352a2b4e65a1)



Why'd you post an image of a man with a rat on his head?  Is it some sort of subtle dig at Trump's toupee?
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: brimic on October 22, 2015, 12:03:30 PM
Heh.  That photo would drive me to drink.

Ironically, alcohol is about the only chance they have.  >:D
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Andiron on October 22, 2015, 12:08:51 PM
Ironically, alcohol is about the only chance they have.  >:D

Beat me to it.  :P
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: lee n. field on October 22, 2015, 01:59:32 PM
Quote
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.campaignforbrockport.com%2Fimages%2Ffaculty-lesavoy_13.jpg&hash=d9fc9156d7f678a9083eada383f3352a2b4e65a1)

Two thoughts.

1)Where did she get those glasses?  Reminds me of a cruel spinster grade school teacher that I might have encountered in the '60s.

2)DNA check.  Just sayin'.  Might be some gender issues.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: BlueStarLizzard on October 22, 2015, 02:56:35 PM
1)  Ever notice that most of the rabid feminists and Pro-abortion zealots are women that you would not ever, no way, no how, want to mate with?
 
2)  (rabid, SJW type) Feminists have this belief that if only women were in charge and men reduced to servile positions then the world would be all magic unicorns and rainbows?   Yet take a social setting where two peopel are wearing the same Dress/Shirt/Tie/Skirt/Sweater/Shoes.  Men will laugh and joke about it while sharing a couple of beers and probably become lifelong friends.  The women will be all angry and upset with each other and ruin the event for pretty much all involved.

Was thinking on the subject of rad fems last night.

Anyway, my issue with them is not just their absurd hatred of men, but also their fairytale fantasy of what woman are and they don't even clue in that their narrow minded definition of feminine traits is so absurd.
I'm going to start calling it Neo-Victorian. Basically, their idea of female is the classical perfection of the Victorian woman, just minus some of the sexual repression and servile nature, and spiffed up to suit more modern tastes in style and ideals.
It's like they took the Gibson girl, put her in a pair of pants and made her a lesbian.

And you're right. I am wondering if the establishment in culture of male dominated society and the limitations on woman's interactions outside the home and in fighting isn't really due to how aggressive and territorial woman really are. When two guys fight it out, they give each other some bruises and maybe a couple broken bones. Sometimes it goes further, but mostly it ends with a few bruised feelings and then, they get over it.
Could you imagine if it was socially acceptable for woman to duke it out? If we didn't kill off our oppoinant in that moment, we'd be killing her off later. Stick woman in the homes with the children and at least when that aggressive nature comes out, it's constructive and rightfully protecting territory and young.

And I'll admit, I partially come to this conclusion because of working with intact dogs and bitches for so long. Yes, we keep the big boys separated and brawls between them are no joke. But the bitches? Once war breaks out, it's done. They will always hate each other after that. The boys may be more obvious when they get aggressive, but it's rare that they will single out another boy that they've had a beef with and seek him out to continue the fight. The bitches will intentionally go at another bitch (or male) long after the initial battle is over, done and dead. Hell, there are two girls, right now, that are not even allowed into the same area of the farm. They just aren't allowed to even see each other, because the one girl really just wants to kill the other one.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Perd Hapley on October 22, 2015, 04:01:39 PM
Anyway, my issue with them is not just their absurd hatred of men, but also their fairytale fantasy of what woman are and they don't even clue in that their narrow minded definition of feminine traits is so absurd.
I'm going to start calling it Neo-Victorian. Basically, their idea of female is the classical perfection of the Victorian woman, just minus some of the sexual repression and servile nature, and spiffed up to suit more modern tastes in style and ideals.
It's like they took the Gibson girl, put her in a pair of pants and made her a lesbian.

I believe you are onto something.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Viking on October 22, 2015, 04:14:14 PM
Two thoughts.

1)Where did she get those glasses?  Reminds me of a cruel spinster grade school teacher that I might have encountered in the '60s.

2)DNA check.  Just sayin'.  Might be some gender issues.
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FudXdHne.jpg&hash=9c695b958e0113b711fc3e638c79a691ed92fa66)
"You said "Patriarchy" twice."
"I like Patriarchy."
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: MillCreek on October 22, 2015, 05:10:13 PM
^^^^ What is 'headmates'?
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Perd Hapley on October 22, 2015, 05:27:45 PM
^^^^ What is 'headmates'?


I want to know, but I am worried I will not like the answer.  =|
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Viking on October 22, 2015, 10:09:18 PM
^^^^ What is 'headmates'?
Imaginary friends, only for "adults".
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: lee n. field on October 22, 2015, 11:16:23 PM
^^^^ What is 'headmates'?

something related to head lice?
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: HankB on October 23, 2015, 03:51:29 PM
Ironically, alcohol is about the only chance they have.  >:D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQSw56Gxod0
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Scout26 on October 23, 2015, 07:21:36 PM
Getting back to the OP person in the picture looks like Moes daughter
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Doggy Daddy on October 23, 2015, 11:35:03 PM
Getting back to the OP person in the picture looks like Moes daughter

Trying not to think about seeing his "Moe Face".
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: RevDisk on October 27, 2015, 12:14:52 PM

At the risk of sounding extremely unpopular, why are so many folks focusing on her unattractiveness? I've met quite a few of ya. You all don't have room to speak. I'm not excepting myself from that either.  =D

She believes the President either is or should be a dictator. That is more than enough to prove she is a horrible human being. Her ugliness has no bearing on her disturbing ideology, folks.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: BlueStarLizzard on October 27, 2015, 12:24:20 PM
Having also meet quiet a few APS members...

Nobody I've met is that bad.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Ron on October 27, 2015, 08:33:42 PM
At the risk of sounding extremely unpopular, why are so many folks focusing on her unattractiveness? I've met quite a few of ya. You all don't have room to speak. I'm not excepting myself from that either.  =D

She believes the President either is or should be a dictator. That is more than enough to prove she is a horrible human being. Her ugliness has no bearing on her disturbing ideology, folks.

We're hardwired to want to be wanted, to be valued and desired.

The attacks on looks are vicious and effective because they bypass our reason and hit us in a most vulnerable spot.

Ones worthiness and fitness to breed children based on our most basest drive, physical attraction.

 

 
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Andiron on October 27, 2015, 09:14:40 PM
At the risk of sounding extremely unpopular, why are so many folks focusing on her unattractiveness? I've met quite a few of ya. You all don't have room to speak. I'm not excepting myself from that either.  =D

She believes the President either is or should be a dictator. That is more than enough to prove she is a horrible human being. Her ugliness has no bearing on her disturbing ideology, folks.

Goes back to the OP,  she fits the stereotype.  No different than someone insinuating that all yokels screw sheep when they can't lay hands on a cousin.

Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Perd Hapley on October 27, 2015, 09:58:33 PM
Goes back to the OP,  she fits the stereotype.


That would be all that I have to say about her looks. From her politics, to her sexual orientation, to her devotion to Barack Obama, to her physical appearance, she embodies the stereotype of a gender studies academic. The point of the thread is to mock her holistically. ;)

The only place she might stand out a bit is in being so public about how much she depends on a man to fix all the problems, and make it all better.  =)
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Doggy Daddy on October 27, 2015, 11:04:17 PM
At the risk of sounding extremely unpopular, why are so many folks focusing on her unattractiveness? I've met quite a few of ya. You all don't have room to speak. I'm not excepting myself from that either.  =D

Because it's self-inflicted. She has put on a uniform the same as any skinny-pants-wearing, fedora-doffing hipster.  It's the statement she is willingly making that I reject.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Jocassee on October 27, 2015, 11:50:11 PM
At the risk of sounding extremely unpopular, why are so many folks focusing on her unattractiveness? I've met quite a few of ya. You all don't have room to speak. I'm not excepting myself from that either.  =D

She believes the President either is or should be a dictator. That is more than enough to prove she is a horrible human being. Her ugliness has no bearing on her disturbing ideology, folks.

It's worth noting to me because so many northeastern jewish women look exactly like that. And they're all stark raving leftist lunatics. The unattractiveness is not really relevant..just the overall look.
Title: Re: This week in rigid adherence to stereotype:
Post by: Perd Hapley on October 28, 2015, 04:14:13 PM
Ridiculing a person's personal appearance, speech impediment, accent, height, whatever, is something people do when they have a strong disagreement with them. I wish it weren't so, but I don't see it going away.  =|