No. The mistake was your putting the link below your comments about it. Personally, I was only confused until I saw the link, and realized you were ranting about something I (and probably most of us) hadn't seen yet. Maybe next time introduce the subject before commenting on it. A "little more effort," if you will.
Meh, RIF. My post was more pulp fiction and less Umberto Eco, level of difficulty-wise.
To that end, I explicitly referred to "to the
author's curt dismissal"* (no italics in original) and kept things in chronological order* as they occurred, if not fMS (fistful Manual of Style).
Also, I don't think I have made it a habit to refer to myself in the third person* or the royal "we." When I write about myself, it is almost invariably in the first person.
And that is just the first sentence. If one were to, maybe,
actually read the entirety of the post, it is about as clear as can be without providing crib sheet or a native guide.
* Context Clues: Not just for grade school.
http://wserver.scc.losrios.edu/~langlit/reading/contextclues/intro1.htm