What? 
Dude's dead. And he's a "public figure." Why can't they call him whatever they want?
Is that a serious question?
Because Europe does not have an absolute (or even as close as we do) right to freedom of speech, and after the 20th century law makers in Europe are very conservative, nigh on Draconian, about not allowing speech that might condone violence against, or belittling of, an established culture or religion. European society has pretty much agreed that allowing crazy folks to talk crazy lead to a bunch of dead people, so they don't allow any talk that could be seen as crazy.
In this case, the presenter called Mohammad a pedophile and said that Muslim men try to absolutely emulate him, by inference calling Muslim men pedophiles (or at least more OK with it then standard western society appreciates). You can't say that in much of Europe. It's against the law.
Had she said the Mohammad married young girls, and Muslim men try to emulate yada, yada, she probably would have been alright, because the marriage to, and deflowering of, the young girl is historical fact. The court found that that act didn't make him a pedophile. Which is the clever parsing I was referring to most folks regretting.
The Court found that if you marry and have sex with a girl under 10, you aren't a pedophile as long as you also like women that have reached maturity. And since Mohammad wasn't a pedophile, calling him one in Europe is a hate crime, and legally actionable.
at this point we can just Ref: all our previous threads about Europe's historical "Zero to Jackboot" transition times, and wait for the inevitable.
