Author Topic: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...  (Read 10885 times)

Werewolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Lead, Follow or Get the HELL out of the WAY!
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #25 on: February 09, 2009, 03:33:54 PM »
I have thouands of books in my home. It's a pain in the butt sometimes. But, I'll never be without them.

When I read something for pleasure, I want the tactile feel of paper between my fingers, and the smell of paper, from cheap pulp acid stock books to fine linen-based archival quality, books in my nose...

I've tried reading books on my computer, and within 10 minutes I'm going out of my mind, hating what I'm doing. It's not pleasure at that point, it's work.

^^^
What HE said...
Life is short, Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love
truly, Laugh uncontrollably, And never regret anything that made you smile.

Fight Me Online

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,017
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #26 on: February 09, 2009, 04:02:34 PM »
I'd be tempted to buy the Sony version (as it accepts PDF, RTF, TXT, etc.) IF books were sold in DRM-free formats.

Let me buy a txt file.  The device can deal with formatting, and thus compensate for the text size and page layout I choose.

Till I can buy txt files - no way I'm getting an e-book reader.

+ a lot to this sentiment.  Something that handles a variety of formats would be spot on.  I would love something like this for air travel. 
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

Iain

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,490
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2009, 04:03:00 PM »
Heck, the Acer jobbies go for $350 'round here, $10 less than the Kindle.

And aside from my hard drive failure I can recommend it fairly strongly. Then again, I've dropped another chunk of money on the thing to get a 9 cell battery.

Balog is right though, reading .pdf's on any screen gets pretty tiring after a while.
I do not like, when with me play, and I think that you also

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #28 on: February 09, 2009, 04:03:27 PM »
+ a lot to this sentiment.  Something that handles a variety of formats would be spot on.  I would love something like this for air travel. 

1. I totally agree with this.

2. Congrats on your 1000th post MillCreek.  =D
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

zahc

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,803
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #29 on: February 09, 2009, 04:05:32 PM »
Quote
That's very lossy, though. If you've got a good system, you'd definitely notice loss of quality

Have you ever actually tried it? I know it gives the audiophiles fits to think about it, but using any decent soundcard at all, the quality loss is imperceptible. Recall that the best-sounding albums ever were made in the seventies when the recording was effectively re-recorded to lossy analog media probably dozens of times between the mic and the vinyl cutting head. I DO have a nice system, and I record vinyl using my plain-vanilla soundcard all the time, and the results sound perfect, even on headphones.
Maybe a rare occurence, but then you only have to get murdered once to ruin your whole day.
--Tallpine

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #30 on: February 09, 2009, 04:10:34 PM »
Debating starting a new thread on this, but wth is the difference between a netbook, ultra-mobile pc, and a small laptop? If I just want something small and easily portable to browse the internet on (via wifi) or read .txt and .pdf files while on the bus or generally out and about, which would I need?
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

Iain

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,490
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #31 on: February 09, 2009, 04:22:24 PM »
I'm not really sure what the difference is either, seems that no-one has a good definition.

I've had a couple of devices that could fit largely into your criteria (wifi and pdf) - the Acer Aspire One and the Archos 605. I'd choose the netbook every time, it might be considerably bigger, but folded up and put in my manbag (oh the shame, but it is so useful) it is no more noticeable than a decent sized hardback book. Now I've got a proper OS on it (Xubuntu, but XP would count too) it is a very useful too.

Now - off to Starbucks to pretend to write a novel.
I do not like, when with me play, and I think that you also

Gewehr98

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,010
  • Yee-haa!
    • Neural Misfires (Blog)
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #32 on: February 09, 2009, 04:31:51 PM »
Zahc,

You are indeed correct.

Some of the best-sounding music comes from a vinyl pressing tracked via a diamond stylus, then amplified with electrons shed by glowing filaments zipping through plates and grids.

Hardly DDD in the transition from performer to listener, but as Bogie and I can attest to, it's pure heaven!   =D

It's why this workstation has a tube amp attached to the sound card, too. 

Well, that, and the big floor-standing speakers on either side...
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

http://neuralmisfires.blogspot.com

"Never squat with your spurs on!"

Bigjake

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,024
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #33 on: February 09, 2009, 05:12:18 PM »

I can see the utility of this. It's a lot easier to carry one lil device than 5 books. And yes, I'm the sort of person who takes 5 books every time I fly out of town. Being able to take along a few thousand books, so I can pick and choose based on my mood..... that'd be awesome.

I've considered getting a small netbook kinda lappie: I see them from Tiger Direct and the other wholesalers for a couple hundred bucks all the time. But it's a pain in the ass trying to read long pdf's or text files on a lappie.

I couldn't agree with ya more.

Long trip/deployment?  I like the thought of a few 1000 books available in a Kindle sized thinger.

The two sticking points I see are the format snafus, and battery life.


For the money, I'd rather have one of those eincy weency ASUS critters, and a pile of PDF books on the drive.

seeker_two

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,922
  • In short, most intelligence is false.
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #34 on: February 09, 2009, 05:15:27 PM »
The Kindle looks like an interesting device (kinda like the PADD from STAR TREK), but I think it would sell better if it could support more apps than just the books.....like .pdf, .doc, & .txt files, maybe MP3 or MP4 files (listen while you read), and perhaps touchscreen typing for note-taking or other reminders). Maybe even store photos for use as a digital pic frame/screensaver when not used as a reader.

One-trick ponies don't sell anymore....you have to multi-task to survive....  :cool:
Impressed yet befogged, they grasped at his vivid leading phrases, seeing only their surface meaning, and missing the deeper current of his thought.

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,017
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #35 on: February 09, 2009, 05:16:10 PM »
I just thought of another reason why these electronic book readers may be a good idea.  I assume that you can increase the size of the display typeface.  That would mean I could read without having to use a pair of reading glasses.  I will hit the half-century mark next year, and I am already starting to use reading glasses more and more.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

Marnoot

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,965
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #36 on: February 09, 2009, 05:19:57 PM »
I just thought of another reason why these electronic book readers may be a good idea.  I assume that you can increase the size of the display typeface.  That would mean I could read without having to use a pair of reading glasses.  I will hit the half-century mark next year, and I am already starting to use reading glasses more and more.

Another pro for the e-books over a net/note-book is the display. LCD screens flicker and can cause eye-strain and headaches after awhile. The e-book screens only update/refresh when a new page is loaded, so there is no flickering. That and the reading is more like from a paper as the screen is reflective (like paper) rather than transmissive, like a computer monitor.

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #37 on: February 09, 2009, 06:11:22 PM »
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

buzz_knox

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #38 on: February 09, 2009, 06:12:49 PM »
The Kindle looks like an interesting device (kinda like the PADD from STAR TREK), but I think it would sell better if it could support more apps than just the books.....like .pdf, .doc, & .txt files, maybe MP3 or MP4 files (listen while you read), and perhaps touchscreen typing for note-taking or other reminders). Maybe even store photos for use as a digital pic frame/screensaver when not used as a reader.

One-trick ponies don't sell anymore....you have to multi-task to survive....  :cool:

I could be wrong, but I believe the Kindle does quite a bit of this.

buzz_knox

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #39 on: February 09, 2009, 06:14:55 PM »
Of course - it doesn't...

Except that I'm a cheap SOB and can't imagine myself buying the same book twice.

Me too.  That's why I rarely dowloand something I already own.  The classics (Monster Hunter International) will be bought in both formats but the other duplicates come from free sources.  Since Amazon bought Mobipocket, there is quite a bit of free material out there.

Regolith

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,171
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #40 on: February 09, 2009, 06:30:09 PM »
Bring down the price to $100-150 and lose the current DRM model, and I'd buy one.  I don't mind reading on a screen, and these screens are supposed to have such a high contrast ratio that it's almost as good as reading a printed page. 

Personally, I'd like to be able to download the ebook to my computer, then upload them to the Kindle so I could keep backups.  Also, $9.99 for an ebook is a bit ridiculous, particularly when you can usually buy the actual book for less.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. - Thomas Jefferson

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt the Younger

Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything. - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth

Iain

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,490
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #41 on: February 09, 2009, 06:44:03 PM »
Iain: is this the sort of thing you had?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220369


That sort of thing. There are several models out from different manufacturers. Massive numbers of Asus Eee models, more than I've kept track of. Dell have a Mini 9 and now a Mini 10 (screen size, resolution is the same though). Acer have the original Aspire One, and now 10" model. Samsung have one, Lenovo have one. The MSI models are apparently nice. A friend has the 10" Eee, which is ok, but I do prefer the keyboard on my Acer. Nicest keyboards are apparently to be found on the HP models.

Inside though they are all basically the same machine. Most have the 1.6ghz intel atom chip, integrated intel video and between 512mb and 2gb of ram. Hard drives vary.

I'm not sure that there is an advantage to the SSD (solid state drive) models really. I did consider getting one, and maybe oneday I'll replace the conv hdd in this laptop with a decent fast SSD just to have a computer with no moving parts. The SSD's in the cheap netbooks are not particularly good though. My 120gb model cost just £20 more than the 4gb SSD model, so I didn't think twice about it.
I do not like, when with me play, and I think that you also

Nitrogen

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,755
  • Who could it be?
    • @c0t0d0s2 / Twitter.
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #42 on: February 09, 2009, 09:38:46 PM »
I have thouands of books in my home. It's a pain in the butt sometimes. But, I'll never be without them.

When I read something for pleasure, I want the tactile feel of paper between my fingers, and the smell of paper, from cheap pulp acid stock books to fine linen-based archival quality, books in my nose...

I've tried reading books on my computer, and within 10 minutes I'm going out of my mind, hating what I'm doing. It's not pleasure at that point, it's work.

I hate you.  I donated about 400 books when I left California.  I just could not afford to take them all.
itd be nice if you could get a "electronic" version of a book when you buy the print version; because I'd read the print version, then swap or donate it, and like to keep the electronic version.  I'm sure that's "wrong" or "stealing" to some, but it'd be great for those of us with limited space.
יזכר לא עד פעם
Remember. Never Again.
What does it mean to be an American?  Have you forgotten? | http://youtu.be/0w03tJ3IkrM

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #43 on: February 09, 2009, 09:45:16 PM »
I own an extensive library of hardbound books I've been adding to for almost 40 years.

Can I do that with a Kindle?  :rolleyes:

'Nuff Said...
If the Kindle had been designed right you'd be able to do that.  But thanks to the DRM they had to impose on everything...
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 09:53:32 PM by Headless Thompson Gunner »

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #44 on: February 09, 2009, 09:52:35 PM »
Bring down the price to $100-150 and lose the current DRM model, and I'd buy one.  I don't mind reading on a screen, and these screens are supposed to have such a high contrast ratio that it's almost as good as reading a printed page. 

The Sony I looked at was not. There was a flash during the "page turn" that would give me a headache.

lee n. field

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,611
  • tinpot megalomaniac, Paulbot, hardware goon
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2009, 10:34:28 PM »
How about something that costs maybe $50, that I can dump pdfs to for on the go reading?
In thy presence is fulness of joy.
At thy right hand pleasures for evermore.

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2009, 10:36:00 PM »
How about something that costs maybe $50, that I can dump pdfs to for on the go reading?
That would be ideal.

Regolith

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,171
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #47 on: February 10, 2009, 01:14:13 AM »
The Sony I looked at was not. There was a flash during the "page turn" that would give me a headache.

Yeah, but Sony is the HK of the electronics world.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. - Thomas Jefferson

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt the Younger

Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything. - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #48 on: February 10, 2009, 09:11:25 AM »
I could be wrong, but I believe the Kindle does quite a bit of this.

For a fee. It's a nickel and dime device, based on the specs I'd seen. Their EV-DO only, not 802.11.

Subscribing to a newspaper is $14 a month per paper. The same content that is free online or on an iPhone or smartphone.

Subscribing to a BLOG is $1 a month PER BLOG. The same blogs that are free online or on an iPhone or smartphone.

I just don't get the appeal. It's the sort of nickel and diming that usually implies a loss leader device, but instead, it's a premium priced device plus the nickel and diming, and absolutely locked-up DRM.

buzz_knox

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: Amazon's Kindle wasn't selling that well, so...
« Reply #49 on: February 10, 2009, 09:19:03 AM »
Just to be clear, the DRM applies only to Amazon items (as do the fees), not anything else.  The majority of items on my Kindle (which has a full internal memory and a 2GB SD card that is rapidly filling) are not DMR protected and were free.