Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: grislyatoms on March 25, 2007, 11:38:08 AM

Title: More standard transmission woes
Post by: grislyatoms on March 25, 2007, 11:38:08 AM
Well last night I was leaving work and my clutch pedal went all the way to the floor. ('88 F150 5 speed 4wd) Tried putting it in gear and starting it to get home (I can float gears pretty well, all those years driving rock buckets) and got about 15 feet. CRUNCH! from inside the bell housing, I could smell clutch material cooking. Truck didn't want to move.

I pushed it back to a parking space, called a cab and went home. Got another cab this morning out to the airport to pick up a rental (the agent on the phone said all they had were intermediate cars). Got to the counter, and the sweet attendant asked me if I would like an F-150, no extra charge. COOL!

I am in love. It's a 2007 4 door 4WD. Daddy like! Daddy can't afford, but Daddy still like, very much!

Anyway, "the beast" is getting towed down the street for repair. It's got one of those dumb-ass concentric slave cylinders that's INSIDE the frickin' bell housing, for pete's sake.

I don't have a tranny jack, and pretty much only have basic hand tools. I'm gonna let the pros handle this one, and I am going to have them replace the hydraulics too, so I won't have to worry about it. $800 or so, at this point. Damnit.

Did I mention how much I like the 2007? I REALLY like it!

Now back to your regularly scheduled banter.

Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Monkeyleg on March 25, 2007, 12:57:25 PM
The slave cylinder is inside the bell housing? Nice engineering. Sad
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Tallpine on March 25, 2007, 01:04:10 PM
The slave cylinder is inside the bell housing? Nice engineering. Sad

yep, it's a "donut" that fits around the input shaft like a throwout bearing Sad

My daughter has an '89 F150 and it is broke down more than it runs.  First and last ford that I'll ever buy  rolleyes
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: grislyatoms on March 25, 2007, 01:11:10 PM
The slave cylinder is inside the bell housing? Nice engineering. Sad

When I saw the diagram in my cruddy Haynes manual, I thought "What bonehead designed this junk?" Then I crawled under the pickup to check for sure. Yep. Just like in the diagram. Idiots.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: grislyatoms on March 25, 2007, 01:14:12 PM
The slave cylinder is inside the bell housing? Nice engineering. Sad

yep, it's a "donut" that fits around the input shaft like a throwout bearing Sad

My daughter has an '89 F150 and it is broke down more than it runs.  First and last ford that I'll ever buy  rolleyes

Mine has been problem free up until now, other than an alternator, battery, and some exhaust work. I flipped through my Haynes guide and thought, "No, I'll let the pros take care of this."

I had a '77 F100 that I changed the clutch in, no problem. I am not about to touch this one.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Monkeyleg on March 25, 2007, 01:16:12 PM
That's about as dumb as the motor placement on a Chevy I had. It was a V6. You had to pull the motor to replace the #6 spark plug.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: 280plus on March 25, 2007, 01:34:33 PM
hah, the clutch master cylinder on my '83 AMC Eagle was mounted to the firewall and was held there with nuts and bolts, one standard and one metric just to make it more interesting, so someone had to hold the nut on one side while someone else turned the bolt on the other. Naturally you had to go under the dash upside down and backwards to get to that side of the thing. Engineers...  rolleyes
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Gewehr98 on March 25, 2007, 01:35:18 PM
Those coaxial slave cylinder units are getting more popular.  My 2001 S-10 started leaking through the slave cylinder, coating the pressure plate with hydraulic fluid, etc. Glad I had the drivetrain warranty!

Give me the good old days when the clutch slave cylinder was outside the bell housing, and actuated the throwout bearing via a connecting rod.   undecided
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: grislyatoms on March 25, 2007, 01:37:22 PM
I had a water pump go out in an old Toyota Corolla, couple years ago. Simple. Just undo the motor mounts, jack the engine, remove the timing belt cover... ad nauseam. These engineers must have gone to the "Homer Simpson School of Engineering and Hair Styling". rolleyes
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Art Eatman on March 25, 2007, 01:39:27 PM
The tight fit where the exhaust pipe(s) go past the slave cylinder led to temperature problems.  So, instead of some re-route of the exhaust, or adding a little heat shield, they moved the slave cylinder to inside the bell housing.  I disremember what year Toyota did this, but they took me out of the new-critter market with that.  (Well, late-model good-used, anyhow.)

Art
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: 280plus on March 25, 2007, 01:44:45 PM
Sigh, I remember my old '70 Fiat 124 wagon. You could do EVERYTHING from up above under the hood except pull the oil pan plug. Even the clutch linkage could be adjusted from there. The little clunker would do 90 mph in 3rd gear too! In 1980 I drove it from Long Beach to Hartford, I took 9 meandering around days and it only cost me $125 in gas for the whole trip.  grin
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: DJJ on March 25, 2007, 04:02:00 PM
Don't blame the engineers. They're being designed by bean counters now; the engineers are (I would speculate) being told to design them to be cheaper, faster and easier for trained monkeys to put together once, and that's it.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: mfree on March 25, 2007, 05:53:32 PM
Dodge shadow... been working on this thing for years. It's my beater... and I mean that literally. It's my rallycrossing car Smiley

Anyhoo, only two things stick in my craw about the design on the 2.2l engine. One, the starter's a beast to access, being behind the engine tucked down on top of the K-member. Two, the water pump has something like 15 bolts.

That's about it. its' the first car I've ever seen where you can drop the oil pan and change the rod and main bearings from under the car. I worked on another one, this one an auto... first car I've ever worked on where you didn't have to get under it to change the transmission... it comes out the "side", kinda rocks down and forward and such. You can also change the head gasket in about 15 minutes if there aren't any complications... just undo the bolts and the cam pulley (leave the belt on and secure), lift the head off the block about 1/2" and slide the old one out... slide the new one in, bolts in and torqued, reattach the pulley.... golden. Just crank it a few times with the plugs out to clear the cylinders enough to fire without breaking anything.

I'm going to stick with it, frankly. Even though I think the clutch is going south (doesn't slip, just REAL high on the pedal) and I'm no reasonably certain the fuel pump is failing (hey, 125000 miles, 15 years, and several runs bounding through fields at 45mph can cause anything...)

Most of your guy's accessability and design issues with the smaller cars come from adapting longitudinal mount engines to transverse work and vice versa. Wierd things happen when you take a block package that's designed to sit on two side mounts and try and make it fit hung from what used to be the front top and the transmission.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Sergeant Bob on March 25, 2007, 05:57:05 PM
The slave cylinder is inside the bell housing? Nice engineering. Sad
Yeah, I have a Ranger, same deal. While your in there, ya might as well replace the clutch too.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Thor on March 25, 2007, 06:25:23 PM
... Got to the counter, and the sweet attendant asked me if I would like an F-150, no extra charge. COOL!

I am in love. It's a 2007 4 door 4WD. Daddy like! Daddy can't afford, but Daddy still like, very much!


Did I mention how much I like the 2007? I REALLY like it!

Careful. I was in San Diego in 04 for a Judo tournament. I wound up renting an 04 F150 four door. Nothing too fancy, but a year and a half later, I wound up buying an 05 F150 King Ranch........

(I liked my rental a little TOO much I guess)  shocked
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Monkeyleg on March 25, 2007, 06:36:26 PM
The easiest car I've ever had to work on was my Jaguar XKE. Just pop the bonnet, sit on one of the front wheels, and almost everything was very accessible.

The only hard part was adjusting the suspension via the torque bars. It took both a friend and I to get those bars to move.

Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: 280plus on March 26, 2007, 01:06:51 AM
The bonnet? Pop the bonnet? I'd be leery of any car that wears a bonnet. Except around Easter time of course...  grin
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: wmenorr67 on March 26, 2007, 03:19:25 AM
Hey 280 yeah and he probably stored the spare tire and put his gear in the boot.  Really how did the English get to calling the hood a bonnet and the trunk a boot.  Just doesn't make any sense.  Good thing we won the American Revoulion and the war of 1812.  Otherwise we would be speaking English over here instead of good old American.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: 280plus on March 26, 2007, 05:29:39 AM
LOL,,,good point. We invented the car and called it a hood and a trunk first. Where do they come off with all this bonnet stuff? Newbs...  rolleyes

 cheesy



Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: mfree on March 26, 2007, 05:34:21 AM
"We invented the car and called it a hood and a trunk first. "

280plus, didn't know you were a German national...
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: K Frame on March 26, 2007, 05:45:09 AM
'280plus, didn't know you were a German national...'

SNORT!  cheesy
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Art Eatman on March 26, 2007, 05:55:19 AM
XKEs were neat, except for that boat anchor under the hood.  And, ever adjust the valve lash on one of those?

SU carburetors are easy.  If you know how.  If you have a UniSyn.

Cheesy, Art
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: 280plus on March 26, 2007, 06:06:38 AM
Everybody knows Henry Ford invented the car. Don't be trying to tell me the Germans did it first.  angry

 grin
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: charby on March 26, 2007, 06:08:10 AM
Easiest clutch I ever changed was a 87 Suzuki Samauri.

Didn't have to split the U joints, just unbolted 4 bolts in the tail shaft of the tranmission, supported the back of the engine with a block of wood, six bolts on the bell housing and two in the rear, tranny was so light I could hold it up by and lower it by hand on to my chest and slide out on a creeper.

-C
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: French G. on March 26, 2007, 07:52:24 AM
Quote
The easiest car I've ever had to work on was my Jaguar XKE. Just pop the bonnet, sit on one of the front wheels, and almost everything was very accessible.

It better be easy to work on since it will be worked on frequently. The most I know about Jags is my dad is the not so proud owner of a free XJ-6 because the guy he was fixing it for got told by the wife that either she or the car was going to go. 

Of course a proper bonnet is made of alu-men-ium.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Monkeyleg on March 26, 2007, 12:06:25 PM
Art, I tore that car down to the last nut and bolt, and rebuilt it into a trophy car. Did a ton of welding, too. Those body compartments really lent themselves to rusting.

Tore the engine completely apart and replaced almost everything. So, yes, I did adjust the valves. I had triple SU's on it, but didn't find them that difficult to tune. The Unisyn helped.

One of the most difficult parts of working on a British car is interpreting the language. Bonnet, boot, spanner, tyre...there were some terms in the manual I still don't understand.

Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Brad Johnson on March 26, 2007, 12:58:34 PM

Quote
I had triple SU's on it, but didn't find them that difficult to tune.

See kids, that's what happens when you smoke crack.  It messes with your memory.

Brad
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Monkeyleg on March 26, 2007, 01:21:58 PM
Wiseguy. Wink
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Phyphor on March 26, 2007, 06:40:31 PM
The slave cylinder is inside the bell housing? Nice engineering. Sad

No *expletive deleted*it.... Seriously, WTF?Huh? On my dad's Nissan pickup, it was bolted to the outside, with the piston applying to a very obvious ARM coming from outside the bell.  Oh so simple to change.


WTF is wrong with those engineers?
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: grislyatoms on March 30, 2007, 09:29:59 AM
Sheesh. $2100 and change.

Some dork took a torch to the transfer case drain plug (to loosen it apparently) and MELTED the transfer case (it's aluminum) around the drain plug. Had a hole drilled and tapped so the goo can be be changed.

The shifter at the tranny was supported with a couple pieces of plastic tubing instead of the normal configuration. Pinion seal in the rear end was leaking. Had a hole drilled and tapped into the front diff so it can be lubed properly. New u-joints (they weren't too bad but what the hell). New starter (it was going bad, the bendix sometimes wouldn't come out). New fan clutch. New clutch, master cylinder, slave cylinder and hydraulic lines. Turned the flywheel around so that it had some good teeth and resurfaced it. There was some other stuff too that I am not remembering right now.

If I don't get another good 100K out of it I am going to go off my rocker.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: charby on March 30, 2007, 09:57:51 AM
ouch....  So they cooked the transfer case or whomever owned it before you did?

Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: grislyatoms on March 30, 2007, 09:59:00 AM
Previous owner torched it.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Phyphor on April 01, 2007, 11:42:01 AM
Heh, I know a guy who once used a blowtorch to get a throwout bearing off....

Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Monkeyleg on April 01, 2007, 06:04:51 PM
"Heh, I know a guy who once used a blowtorch to get a throwout bearing off...."

The last boss I had back in the mid-1980's got some tar or other goop on the left front fender of his rather expensive car. He tried to use a Brillo pad to get it off.

Obenient servant that I was, I buffed out the area on company time.

Likeable guy, but a real nitwit when it came to cars.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Phyphor on April 01, 2007, 06:40:16 PM
Well, I've had my own moments.  Namely, on a Chevy Spectrum.  Attempting to reinstall the trans after changing the clutch.  The throwout bearing on that trans (FWD) was held on by some wierd wire clip thingy.  Anyhoo, I pick the trans up, try to slide it on, change my grip to a handy arm thing - and the clip/throwout bearing assy goes flying. Repeat 4-5 times (hey, it was a hot day! I wasn't tracking so well,)
I look at the trans, and notice that that handy arm thing is actually the actuator for the throwout bearing...and since it wasn't slid into the pressure plate assy, it popped the clip off and sent the whole damned thing flying.

Never did get the $%$@ing thing back together right.

No big loss, tho.

Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: RadioFreeSeaLab on April 01, 2007, 07:48:56 PM
The slave cylinder is inside the bell housing? Nice engineering. Sad
Yes, that happened to my 2002 F-150.  Amazingly, it wasn't under my oh-so-expensive warranty.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: 280plus on April 02, 2007, 12:54:43 AM
In "the old days" when the clutch pedal was connected to the throwout bearing by a fork I did one of the clutch jobs on the Mustang and when I got it all together the thing just wasn't right. Lo and behold, the spring clip that held the fork to the bell housing had broken and the fork was just a flopping around in there with nothing to hold it in place. Yup, back out comes the tranny and back to square one we go...  rolleyes
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: mfree on April 02, 2007, 04:21:36 AM
Quote
Well, I've had my own moments.  Namely, on a Chevy Spectrum.

Impossible. Those were made by our exalted, Sainted Toyota.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: grislyatoms on April 02, 2007, 08:06:27 AM
Yup, back out comes the tranny and back to square one we go...  rolleyes

That was my biggest fear on this one, that I would get it all back together and then have to strip it all down again.

It was worth it on this one to let someone else worry about it.
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Tallpine on April 02, 2007, 08:14:30 AM
Yup, back out comes the tranny and back to square one we go...  rolleyes

That was my biggest fear on this one, that I would get it all back together and then have to strip it all down again.
I knew a guy one time that tore down a VW transaxle (for some reason - don't remember now what the original problem was) and when he put it back together, he had four speeds in reverse and one forward  grin
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: 280plus on April 02, 2007, 08:32:52 AM
 cheesy Whoops!
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Gewehr98 on April 02, 2007, 09:53:08 AM
VW air-cooled transaxles were designed to "flip" that way.  On the Transporter and Microbus chassis, there's an outboard gear-reduction unit at the end of the axle shafts.  If you take a VW Transporter-configured transmission and plop it into a Bug, you'll have 4 speeds in reverse and one forwards.  grin
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Phyphor on April 02, 2007, 06:09:18 PM
Quote
Well, I've had my own moments.  Namely, on a Chevy Spectrum.

Impossible. Those were made by our exalted, Sainted Toyota.

No way.  It's a renamed Isuzu Gemeni.

All they did was just slap a Chevy badge on it and import it over here.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isuzu_Gemini
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: mfree on April 03, 2007, 04:11:01 AM
WHOOPS. I was thinking about the Nova Smiley

Not often I screw up about car stuff, but I'll admit it when I do...
Title: Re: More standard transmission woes
Post by: Phyphor on April 03, 2007, 03:09:33 PM
WHOOPS. I was thinking about the Nova Smiley

Not often I screw up about car stuff, but I'll admit it when I do...

No worries, the gahdamned thing threw me when my cousin's hubby found a clutch for it in the junkyard (clutch for a Chevy.... in an Isuzu that looked and worked the exact same.)

And lemme tell you friend, getting that frelling trans out of that bastard wasn't a game, wasn't work, it was a frelling *ADVENTURE*