Information leading to the arrest of Hillary Clinton

[Perd Hapley]

Just curious how seriously folks around here take this whole thing. My answer is number 2, because I don't want to get Vince-Fostered.

[Pb]

I'm going to go with "I don't know."

[Perd Hapley]

I'm going to go with "I don't know."

Me too. That's why my answer is 2.

[Tuco]

I know a honeypot when I see one and this is a honeypot.
Perd. Harrumph. Compromised.

[Perd Hapley]

I know a honeypot when I see one and this is a honeypot.
Perd. Harrumph. Compromised.

Oh you're definitely going on the list.

[WLJ]

Perd Hapley did not kill himself

[MechAg94]

I like the "I don't know" answer.  There are suspicious circumstances, but no real proof.

[Perd Hapley]

"I don't know the thing" has been added as an option.

[Boomhauer]

Absolutely yes without a doubt

[230RN]

Like so many things, it's been institutionalized like "Vote early, vote often" for Chicago.

An unproven... institution.

I'm reminded of the Simpson's episode where Lisa gets to be President and one of the SS men asks, "Do you want him killed?  You get two free ones."

I accept the certainty that people of power all over the world, all over the centuries, have weilded power in deadly ways.

As the saying goes, "Power corrupts."

2.

Terry, 230RN

Note.  The logic of "proof:"

1.There is no proof without evidence.
2. There is no evidence without investigation.
3. There is no investigation without suspicion.
4. But suspicion without proof is paranoia, so shut up, you paranoid conservative.