May have overlooked it or they haven't said but who made the initial reckless driving call?
The reason for that initial stop seems to be more and more critical. It was stated "officially" that it was not for reckless driving, still, to my mind, it seems like "officially," everybody's side-stepping the issue.
Yet apparently, Nichols himself recognized a genuine danger and tried (unsuccessfully) to run away and the beating started when they caught up to him. And they were pretty diligent about tracking him down after his escape. (I was tempted to add, "escape from their clutches.")
As I say, the genuine honest-to-G-d reason for the initial stop seems to be more and more critical, yet less and less accessible.
Any clues, any rumors, anything?
Terry, 230RN