Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Ned Hamford on August 11, 2011, 02:12:36 PM

Title: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Ned Hamford on August 11, 2011, 02:12:36 PM
As a check I received was from Bank of America I decided to cash it there to save the hassle of the hold and risk of expense if it bounced.

They required a photocopy of my driver's license for their own records and my thumbprint atop the check.  I asked if this was really required and if there was any alternative, bank manager who was handy said no.  Having closed an account with them a few weeks back when they opened a company in my name without my consent, I figured they already had all my info so I went along [and also smudged the print].  Asking for a wipe, was told the thumbprint ink rubs off...

How widespread is this? 

And just for my own comment on the matter, ain't it lovely how big businesses believe their 'Policies' trump the actual law?
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 11, 2011, 02:17:41 PM
been around for years
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Nick1911 on August 11, 2011, 02:59:58 PM
And just for my own comment on the matter, ain't it lovely how big businesses believe their 'Policies' trump the actual law?

Does it?

If so, why don't I write you a check from my bank of america account, have you document/record their refusal to honor the check without this BS, then I'll sue em?   >:D
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Balog on August 11, 2011, 03:02:09 PM
What "actual law" is violated by requiring a print to cash checks?
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Ned Hamford on August 11, 2011, 05:34:51 PM
What "actual law" is violated by requiring a print to cash checks?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negotiable_Instrument#In_the_United_States

Checks, be their definition at law, require no act for conversion to cash beyond their presentation.  Showing your ID is one thing, prudent verification of the presenter, but fingerprints and ID photocopies?  I do believe that crosses the line, constituting additional acts. 

Not that I will do anything about it beyond write a bounced check clause into my agreements and use my own darn bank in the future. 

Oh, and grumble about it on the internet.   :P
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: RevDisk on August 11, 2011, 05:38:17 PM

This is why I use a good credit union and a semi small local bank chain. 
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Chuck Dye on August 11, 2011, 05:48:19 PM
Many truck stops began demanding thumb prints years ago, say doing so dramatically reduced fraud.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Jamisjockey on August 11, 2011, 07:03:23 PM
No thumbprinting with Chase.  And none at BB&T (previous bank).  BofA isn't really a bank, but a collection of bad business practices propped up with government money.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Hawkmoon on August 11, 2011, 07:04:21 PM
How widespread is this? 

And just for my own comment on the matter, ain't it lovely how big businesses believe their 'Policies' trump the actual law?

First I've heard of it.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 11, 2011, 08:53:33 PM
No thumbprinting with Chase.  And none at BB&T (previous bank).  BofA isn't really a bank, but a collection of bad business practices propped up with government money.

bb&t thumbprinted me on wed.

the reason they print is to provide solid evidence for fraud persecution. otherwise the landshark requires the teller to positively id the person who wrote the check. if they can't the crook walked
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: TechMan on August 11, 2011, 09:29:22 PM
Key Bank requires it.  IIRC it has been around since at least late 90's early 00's.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Jamisjockey on August 11, 2011, 09:52:58 PM
bb&t thumbprinted me on wed.

the reason they print is to provide solid evidence for fraud persecution. otherwise the landshark requires the teller to positively id the person who wrote the check. if they can't the crook walked

Cashing a check from your account or one written to you?
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: dogmush on August 11, 2011, 10:02:35 PM
I can tell you for a fact if you make a large, loud fuss in BoA, demeand to speak to a manager, and loudly question weather they have the funds to cover the accounts they hold, BoA will cash one of their checks for $300 without a thumbprint.  I had to show ID, but that's it.  It did take me about an hour though.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 11, 2011, 10:08:26 PM
Cashing a check from your account or one written to you?
written to me   
and dd?  i charged the homeowner the extra 10 bucks and told him why.  he was "displeased " to find that his check was not honored in the way he expected it to be   and did not like paying extra.  hes 75 and was gonna express his displeasure personally

i have a clause in my contracts refusing some banks checks altogether
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: CNYCacher on August 11, 2011, 10:10:18 PM
Someone walking in off the street who does not have an account at the bank but is cashing a check drawn on an account at that bank can expect this at a lot of major branches going back at least a few years.  The new thing that some of them are doing is trying to asses a fee as well.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 11, 2011, 10:18:26 PM
my dad wrote me a check for 6500 bucks  chevy chase made me jump through silly hoops to cash it.  we went together the next day to close out several accounts and move enough loot that i wouda been afraid to carry it armed. and made sure to let management at all levels know why. he lives in a senior community and we spread the word  started a local "run on the bank"  got a series of real apologetic letters and calls.  i never said fu to so many people in a row outside a prison
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: RoadKingLarry on August 11, 2011, 10:43:38 PM
Really want to get some scrutiny from a bank?
Deposit a $30K personal check into your checking account.
It was kind of fun.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 11, 2011, 10:47:40 PM
try cashing a 9 k check drawn on a jail acct with no id.
i hada go back across the street get a deputy from the prc to come with me and bring my paperwork. i think the teller was a lil weirded out. i tried to hit on her got shot down hard
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: French G. on August 12, 2011, 03:22:48 AM
Put a 60K check in my local bank, no problems. I left BoA, or at least the part that was Nations Bank about 15 years ago. So I'm a kid with about 30K in CDs with your bank but now you're going to(when previously didn't) start charging me $5 for cashier's checks and hitting me with min balance fees in my checking. Now I have no money, but dealt with CUs and local banks ever since. One downside. When you deal with a two branch bank and the power is out at home, good luck getting money out of an ATM if you are elsewhere. I assume their servers are at their main branch.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Jamisjockey on August 12, 2011, 08:39:46 AM
written to me   
and dd?  i charged the homeowner the extra 10 bucks and told him why.  he was "displeased " to find that his check was not honored in the way he expected it to be   and did not like paying extra.  hes 75 and was gonna express his displeasure personally

i have a clause in my contracts refusing some banks checks altogether

Written to you and deposited into your account, or just cashing it (no account at the bank)?
Just curious.  I had BB&T but never cashed any big checks. 
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 12, 2011, 09:20:18 AM
just cashing it. its a regular routine at some banks i think they see me coming and draw straws to see who gets me.  unless theres a new guy they can shaft. i expect a hassle on large checks but banks are beyond retarded. when i tried to cash a check from pnc mortgage to me and they tried to get 10 bucks for cashing a 70 dollar check i was most impolite.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: 41magsnub on August 12, 2011, 09:42:56 AM
Really want to get some scrutiny from a bank?
Deposit a $30K personal check into your checking account.
It was kind of fun.


How so?  I've done that a couple of times over the years with no hassle at Wells Fargo. They take their sweet time clearing it for the funds to be available, but the deposits themselves were entirely routine.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Jamisjockey on August 12, 2011, 09:46:27 AM
just cashing it. its a regular routine at some banks i think they see me coming and draw straws to see who gets me.  unless theres a new guy they can shaft. i expect a hassle on large checks but banks are beyond retarded. when i tried to cash a check from pnc mortgage to me and they tried to get 10 bucks for cashing a 70 dollar check i was most impolite.

I would be, too.
I had a $30 check I left for the yard guys go missing on a rainy day when they didn't show up.  Called to get it cancelled.  The fee? $29.  I lost my ever loving mind on the person on the phone.
(In the end, the yard guy made his rounds checking the wetness of our yards, and collected his check, and cut the grass the next day  :facepalm:)
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 12, 2011, 09:51:39 AM
on big checks i call 24 hours or more ahead to make sure they have the cash  then i really get bent when they jerk me around. i've been known to bring the client into it. they love being told the bank just refused to cash their check.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: roo_ster on August 12, 2011, 12:58:39 PM
written to me   
and dd?  i charged the homeowner the extra 10 bucks and told him why.  he was "displeased " to find that his check was not honored in the way he expected it to be   and did not like paying extra.  hes 75 and was gonna express his displeasure personally

i have a clause in my contracts refusing some banks checks altogether
I have an old-timer WWII veteran still alive a few houses down.  He's pretty much the walking dead, what with multiple heart attacks & heart surgeries, but still mobile.  Dude does not give a good gawd damn what others think of him.  I have, in the past, spoken to him about small & local outrages.  Sometimes, he'll get all riled up and he has the (discretionary) time to make folks' shady business a living Hell.

I almost felt bad for the perpetrators, 'cause it was like tossing a grenade into the room and closing the door.  But, I figure everyone's got to have a hobby.  And I love hearing my neighbor tell me the results of his fragging.
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 12, 2011, 02:53:34 PM
Dude does not give a good gawd damn what others think of him


were it not for my daughter that would be me
Title: Re: How long have banks been taking fingerprints?
Post by: Scout26 on August 12, 2011, 05:24:24 PM
BofA isn't really a bank, but a collection of bad business practices propped up with government money.

QFT.

USAA for the win.  I had to go through the Thumbprinting BS when I got check from county for either Jury duty or Election Judge and wanted cash to go to the grocery.  I also smudged mine.

And being on disability also gives me time to be a royal PITA when the mood strikes.  Ask the Wheaton City Council about when comes to their attempts to invoke eminent domain.  Or the School District when they wanted to build a new Hubble Middle School first and then sell the old middle school and the property for "$22Million+".  I suggested that they sell the old property first since 3/4 of it was flood plain (talk about being yelled at for being a "heretic" and "Shun the Unbeliever"), I was literally shouted down by the board.  Well my fellow taxpayers fell for the "It's for the Children" line of bull and they built the school first, and then had trouble selling the property.  It went through four rounds of "Now accepting bids", before someone finally put in a bid for $5,050,000.  The reason for such a low bid (in addition to the crap economy) was that 3/4 of the property was flood plain and unable to be built on.  Rumour has it that they'll sell the flood plain part to the park district for as close to $5,050,000 as they can suck out of the Park District. 

F'ing Morons...