As for the "facts" of whether my house is broken into... this is the same slope as the rape accusation. And I don't mean to put this indelicately, but allowing an assertion of a crime to have been committed stand as proof per se of a crime having been committed is a dangerous precedent. And allowing the State to be the sole arbiter of prosecutable offenses is rife for abuse (as we see in the Chicago DA's discrimination in case selection).
You continue to parse the question to fit your answer.
You take your family on a vacation trip. You are absent from your home for two weeks. Would you consider that a fact, or an allegation?
You return home to find the front door open, the frame shattered, and the lock broken. Would you consider that a fact, or an allegation?
Upon entering the house, you find your belongings strewn all over in a random heap of chaos. Would you consider that a fact, or an allegation?
After taking inventory, you find that your wife's jewelry, your power tools, all the computers, and the wide-screen television are gone. Would you consider that a fact, or an allegation?
My view is that each if these items is something that can be verified, and is therefore a fact. Your position is that (other than perhaps the vacation trip itself) is nothing but an allegation. We are going to have to agree to disagree.