Another recommendation wants the United States to generously [support] a new International Youth Opportunity Fund for the purpose of building and operating primary and secondary schools in . . . Muslim states . . . How many billions and even trillions of taxpayer dollars will be required to build and operate Muslim schools? Schools that will no doubt teach Muslim doctrine. There is certainly no shrill cry against the separation of Mosque and state heard here, Martha.
Yet another recommendation requires global border security using extensive international cooperation. What the heck is this all about? What, pray tell, is global border security? Does this mean using foreign troops to guard our borders?
These will be two issues thrown right into "a stronger U.N.". The former is UNESCO turf, the latter right smack in the middle of the U.N. as a global military force - whether you want to call it a police force, or an army - with a centralization of the "co-operation" between member states on "issues of border security".
And yes, much of the money will be expected to come out of our pockets. Look forward to the global tax coming to the forefront real soon.
Just remember too, who set us up for all this; ".... peace and prosperity in every land."
--------------------------------------------
http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org
a close analysis of the 9/11 report reveals the creation of Homeland Security identity checkpoints on Americas roads and highways
what an ideal location in which to detonate a suicide car bomb ...
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Done and done.
from http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
This statement was used as a motto on the title page of An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania. (1759) which was attributed to Franklin in the edition of 1812, but in a letter of September 27, 1760 to David Hume, he states that he published this book and denies that he wrote it, other than a few remarks that were credited to the Pennsylvania Assembly, in which he served. The phrase itself was first used in a letter from that Assembly dated November 11, 1755 to the Governor of Pennsylvania. An article on the origins of this statement here includes a scan that indicates the original typography of the 1759 document, which uses an archaic form of "s": "Thoſe who would give up Essential Liberty to purchaſe a little Temporary Safety, deſerve neither Liberty nor Safety." Researchers now believe that a fellow diplomat by the name of Richard Jackson is the primary author of the book. With the information thus far available the issue of authorship of the statement is not yet definitely resolved, but the evidence indicates it was very likely Franklin, who in the Poor Richard's Almanack of 1738 is known to have written a similar proverb: "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."
Many variants derived from this phrase have arisen and have usually been incorrectly attributed to Franklin:
"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
"Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither"
"He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security"
"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither"
"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both."
"If we restrict liberty to attain security we will lose them both."
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
"He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither"