Author Topic: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation  (Read 6573 times)

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,953
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2013, 11:03:49 AM »
Full text

Not all that comfortable with:

Quote
means the person is the subject of an order or finding by a judicial officer, court, board, commission, or other adjudicative body--

But at least it accounts for the ruling being set aside.  As soon as you're not crazy this no longer applies. But I wonder how long it takes to get removed from the list.

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2013, 11:37:18 AM »
I see some Congressional "commissions and other adjudicative bodies" being trumped up that finds looooooottts of folks incompetent cough cough VA cough cough.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

SteveS

  • The Voice of Reason
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2013, 10:01:11 PM »
I see some Congressional "commissions and other adjudicative bodies" being trumped up that finds looooooottts of folks incompetent cough cough VA cough cough.

The VA has procedures and safeguards in place that are just as strenuous as any court. Not that this can't be abused, but I don't think I is necessarily bad.
Profanity is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate mother****er.

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #28 on: March 13, 2013, 12:31:33 AM »
The VA has procedures and safeguards in place that are just as strenuous as any court. Not that this can't be abused, but I don't think I is necessarily bad.

Those are administrative not legal. Any bureaucrat can change them just cause.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

SteveS

  • The Voice of Reason
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #29 on: March 13, 2013, 03:53:47 PM »
Those are administrative not legal. Any bureaucrat can change them just cause.

VA administrative proceedings allow for zealous representation.  In addition, you can appeal if you disagree.  Eventually, to a court, if necessary.
Profanity is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate mother****er.

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #30 on: March 13, 2013, 05:01:54 PM »
A free society cannot be governed by "health" and "psychiatry."

These are replacements for the virtue that underpins real liberty.
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #31 on: March 13, 2013, 05:16:01 PM »
VA administrative proceedings allow for zealous representation.  In addition, you can appeal if you disagree.  Eventually, to a court, if necessary.

For now they do. But changing that is (what's that word I'm looking for?) oh yes, and administrative decision. Holding the unelected bureaucrats to standards dreamed up and changeable by other unelected bureaucrats isn't a safeguard.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

DustinD

  • I have a title
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 919
  • I have a personal text message
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #32 on: March 13, 2013, 10:13:02 PM »
Hasn't the federal process for restoring gun rights been "defunded" for many many years and thus currently impossible?
"I don't always shoot defenceless women in the face, but when I do, I prefer H-S Precision.

Stay bloodthirsty, my friends."

                       - Lon Horiuchi

SteveS

  • The Voice of Reason
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #33 on: March 14, 2013, 08:45:33 AM »
For now they do. But changing that is (what's that word I'm looking for?) oh yes, and administrative decision. Holding the unelected bureaucrats to standards dreamed up and changeable by other unelected bureaucrats isn't a safeguard.

Administrative law changes, but IME, it is not as malleable as some think.  I practice in this area (though I am more familiar with SSD procedures) and much of the rules are statutory.  There is also a great deal of case law. 

Profanity is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate mother****er.

SteveS

  • The Voice of Reason
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #34 on: March 14, 2013, 08:55:06 AM »
Hasn't the federal process for restoring gun rights been "defunded" for many many years and thus currently impossible?

Yes, but the NICS Improvement Act did set forth procedures to get removed from the system in regards to mental disqualifications at the federal level.  Basically, you can petition the body that said you were disqualified to say that you are no longer insane.  They have to remove you if you are able to manage your own affairs or have completed treatment.  If they deny you or fail to act, you can file a claim in federal court.

This only applies at the federal level.  States are supposed to set up their own programs.  Most have not.
Profanity is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate mother****er.

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #36 on: March 16, 2013, 11:49:59 AM »
Good NRA.  I will throw them a cookie.
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #37 on: March 16, 2013, 05:28:46 PM »
Harry Reid is not going to let any of them hit the Senate floor.  And should G_d Forbid, any of them pass, they are DOA in the House.
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

SteveS

  • The Voice of Reason
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #38 on: March 16, 2013, 05:39:01 PM »
Harry Reid is not going to let any of them hit the Senate floor.  And should G_d Forbid, any of them pass, they are DOA in the House.

I sure hope so, but I have little faith in very many legislators at the national level.
Profanity is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate mother****er.

Waitone

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,133
Re: Graham Introduces Background Check Legislation
« Reply #39 on: March 17, 2013, 10:03:44 AM »
Quote
And should G_d Forbid, any of them pass, they are DOA in the House.
I have zero confidence in the northeastern republican power structure to consistently stand for anything.  They have no belief system other than playing Charlie Brown to the democrat's Lucy.
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds. It will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."
- Charles Mackay, Scottish journalist, circa 1841

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it." - John Lennon