There is a comedy group that does reenactments from official court records. This is one such instance.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/opinion/verbatim-what-is-a-photocopier.html?_r=0
(Recorder's Office started a new policy, $2 per photocopy, but coupled it with no longer supplying digital copies; making more expansive work prohibitively expensive and tedious. This is a deposition from a suit that ensued.)
For all the drama inserted into the reenactments, it has been my experience that actual events are even more absurd as there is no narrative need for them to be believable, consistent, or even comprehensible.
Favorite part: "If you feel stupid, it's not because I'm making you feel stupid."
You know, I was watching all this and thinking the IT guy (NOTE: this was the head of IT for the county!) was screwing around and, with the help of his lawyer, trying to make some legal claim that some specific type of copier was a photocopier and they weren't responsible because of that.
In the end, no, he was just that ignorant. The head of IT didn't know the definition of the word "photocopier."
(I also note that rather than help with the confusion, the opposing lawyer did everything he could to prolong it, rather than find out if his client actually was confused.)