Armed Polite Society
Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: Brad Johnson on June 26, 2018, 01:02:13 PM
-
Supreme Court upholds travel ban by Presidential order.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/supreme-court-upholds-trump-travel-ban-on-some-muslim-majority-nations.html
So... the President really is allowed to do the things it's spelled out in law that he's allowed to do. Imagine that.
Brad
-
Supreme Court upholds travel ban by Presidential order.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/supreme-court-upholds-trump-travel-ban-on-some-muslim-majority-nations.html
So... the President really is allowed to do the things it's spelled out in law that he's allowed to do. Imagine that.
Brad
THAT'S RACIST!
(Even though Islam is a religion, not a race)
THAT'S RACIST TO POINT OUT THAT ISLAM IS NOT A RACE!
-
Sad that four of the black robes don't understand the Constitution.
Interesting that in the AP article ( https://apnews.com/3a20abe305bd4c989116f82bf535393b/Court-upholds-Trump-travel-ban,-rejects-discrimination-claim ) they proclaim that the ban was upheld by "the conservative majority." I find it interesting that when Kennedy votes their way he's portrayed as "the swing vote," but when he votes the other way he's a conservative, and part of "the conservative majority."
-
I don't know why Muslims would want to come here. Don't they know we're mean to the precious little immigrant dreamer children? I heard ICE was eating them.
-
They have to eat something. Their not allowed in restaurants anymore.
-
Sad that four of the black robes don't understand the Constitution.
Interesting that in the AP article ( https://apnews.com/3a20abe305bd4c989116f82bf535393b/Court-upholds-Trump-travel-ban,-rejects-discrimination-claim ) they proclaim that the ban was upheld by "the conservative majority." I find it interesting that when Kennedy votes their way he's portrayed as "the swing vote," but when he votes the other way he's a conservative, and part of "the conservative majority."
The sad part to me was that this got all the way to the SC. That 4 SC Justices voted against it is criminal.
-
The sad part to me was that this got all the way to the SC. That 4 SC Justices voted against it is criminal.
This; it's not even a question of interpretation. The power is explicitly at the discretion of the Executive.
-
Yahoo news referred to it as "Trump's so-called Travel Ban". No bias there...nope, none at all.
-
It is, in fact, legal for the POTUS to do the things he's legally allowed supposed to do
Fixed all better now.