Not quite. These images were taken using a 6" (150mm) refracting telescope. He was using some really high end gear, though.
It's also only visible in view for a second or two at most, even with a good wide-angle eyepiece.
So it was two times closer, with a scope twice as small, on a solar transit (non-emitting, but rather blocking source). Makes sense, my "just did it in my head math" was within 25% or so.