Far be it from me to suggest that there might be a double standard at play, but ...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2849736/Church-attended-Michael-Brown-s-family-destroyed-Monday-night-s-protests.htmlhttp://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/michael-brown-shooting/feds-probing-arson-michael-brown-sr-s-church-n255961So protesters burn a dozen or so buildings, including three national auto parts stores, a national pharmacy, and a national discount store, and there hasn't been a single mention of anyone "investigating," or any mention of arsonists being arrested. But a black church gets burned during the same "protest," and it's major news and the feds are already involved. (Even though, as far as I know, arson is a state-level crime, not a federal offense.) Smells a lot like reverse discrimination to me.
And the journalist is such a dweeb that he can't even get basic facts straight.
The Missouri church attended by Michael Brown’s father and his family was one of a dozen or so buildings burned to the ground during Monday night’s protests in the wake of a grand jury’s decision not to indict Officer Darren Wilson.
Note to Mr. McCormack: When a concrete block building has its interior damaged by fire but the building is still there for you to photograph the next day, it did not "burn to the ground."
Seems to me like any complaints about that church getting burned fall into the "pot calls kettle black" category, or "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander."