He was a Lefty, or at least was before he took a look at his mental map and made a turn for "due magnetic WTF". He claims in a blog that he volunteered for Gifford's campaign, and felt betrayed she did not vote for a single-payer version of Obamacare.
If NPR is leading with "vitriol" as the root cause, they're now backing up to try and lay it at the Tea Party's feet by proxy.
http://www.npr.org/2011/01/09/132764367/congresswoman-shot-in-arizonaWhen the official line starts being "he was just crazy" and the "political climate" just set him off, that's American MSM code for he was nominally more Left than Right, and they're downplaying it. And trying to imply, "See what happens when the Right dares to stand up and oppose the Left?"
If you're one of our European members who doesn't quite completely get how biased the Mainstream American Media is, it probably seems a bit tin-foilish. Trust me, it's true though. Fox news is considered a "Right Wing mouthpiece" because their reporting is actually neutral and centrist if anything. And the rest of them are so used to a nominal-Left bias in the media, they react with shock to it. Fox does have a majority of right-wing punditry, but they do a better job than the other networks of keeping it separate from the actual hard-news programming. The other networks are content to let it blur quite a bit.
Does anyone remember the media trying to pigeonhole Charles Whitman as a Democrat, Republican, or member of the Boy Scouts (a major terror group, to be sure)?
This pin-the-tail-on-a-party game is ridiculous, and I would think below the members of this forum.
That's well and good, but I think we both know who started that game. And the consequences can be quite real.
I think we'd all be content to shake our heads and say "What a nut" and leave it at that, if the Mainstream Media wasn't immediately pumping out conjecture laying the shooting at the feet of Sarah Palin and the Tea Party.