Author Topic: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"  (Read 3212 times)

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« on: October 31, 2013, 06:13:12 AM »
http://www.scribd.com/doc/180035586/Response-to-Government-Moving-to-Ban-the-Word-Government

Quote
At trial, Mr. Powell hereby demands to be addressed only by his full name, preceded by the title "Mister." Alternatively,he may be called simply "the Citizen Accused." This latter title sounds more respectable than thecriminal "Defendant." The designation "That innocent man" would also be acceptable.

Quote
Rather, counsel for the Citizen Accused should be referred to primarily as the "Defender of the Innocent." This title seems particularly appropriate, because every Citizen Accused is presumed innocent. Alternatively, counsel would also accept the designation "Guardian of the Realm."  Further, the Citizen Accused humbly requests an appropriate military title for his ownrepresentative, to match that of the opposing counsel. Whenever addressed by name, the name "Captain Justice" will be appropriate. While less impressive than "General," still, the more humble term seems suitable. After all, the Captain represents only a Citizen Accused, whereas the General represents an entire State.

Quote
WHEREFORE, Captain Justice, Guardian of the Realm and Leader of the Resistance, primarily asks that the Court deny the State's motion, as lacking legal basis. Alternatively, the Citizen Accused moves for an order in limine modifying the speech code as aforementioned, and requiring any other euphemisms and feel-good terms as the Court finds appropriate.

Go, Captain Justice, Defender of bthe Innocent, Guardian of the Realm, and Leader of the Resistance!

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,914
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2013, 06:48:30 AM »
Hmmmm....  Worthy of some further thought.

I want that lawyer's business card in my wallet.
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

AmbulanceDriver

  • Junior Rocketeer
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,933
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2013, 10:38:28 AM »
*gigglesnort*

And yeah, 230, I want his card too.   :D
Are you a cook, or a RIFLEMAN?  Find out at Appleseed!

http://www.appleseedinfo.org

"For some many people, attempting to process a logical line of thought brings up the blue screen of death." -Blakenzy

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,977
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2013, 10:54:26 AM »
Wow, hilarious!  True art, that was.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2013, 11:05:08 AM »
Government lawyers that take on airs deserve such a witty slapping about.
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

RevDisk

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,633
    • RevDisk.net
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2013, 11:08:53 AM »
Government lawyers that take on airs deserve such a witty slapping about.

Na, they deserve Gitmo. But witty satire slapping about is as good as it gets these days.

It should be a crime for a government employee to knowingly violate the Constitution or rights of any American citizen. If they could be proven beyond reasonable doubt to have knowingly illegally infringed on the rights of any American, they should do time.
"Rev, your picture is in my King James Bible, where Paul talks about "inventors of evil."  Yes, I know you'll take that as a compliment."  - Fistful, possibly highest compliment I've ever received.

TommyGunn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,956
  • Stuck in full auto since birth.
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2013, 11:43:13 AM »
Government lawyers that take on airs deserve such a witty slapping about.

'First thing let's do; let's kill all the >government< lawyers.'
Sorry to go all Shakespearean on youz guyz.  [popcorn]
MOLON LABE   "Through ignorance of what is good and what is bad, the life of men is greatly perplexed." ~~ Cicero

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,253
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2013, 11:44:48 AM »
Counsel for the Accused's actual surname is "Justice", so Captain Justice is apt.  :D
« Last Edit: October 31, 2013, 11:52:14 AM by zxcvbob »
"It's good, though..."

tokugawa

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,850
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2013, 11:48:05 AM »
Na, they deserve Gitmo. But witty satire slapping about is as good as it gets these days.

It should be a crime for a government employee to knowingly violate the Constitution or rights of any American citizen. If they could be proven beyond reasonable doubt to have knowingly illegally infringed on the rights of any American, they should do time.


 I believe it is. But no one ever seems to be charged or convicted or sent to jail. We have an amazing array of laws to protect the citizens from government abuse. But the government are the ones in charge of prosecuting...

 There are no consequences for government abuse of the citizenry, unless the guilty party is a political target for some reason.

Gowen

  • Metal smith
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,074
    • Gemoriah.com
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2013, 01:29:08 PM »
Ok, let's cut to the chase... Hanger, hangee, and hung jury. :P
"That's my hat, I'm the leader!" Napoleon the Bloodhound


Gemoriah.com

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2013, 10:53:05 PM »
Pure Win.
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,914
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2013, 05:54:00 AM »
Na, they deserve Gitmo. But witty satire slapping about is as good as it gets these days.

It should be a crime for a government employee to knowingly violate the Constitution or rights of any American citizen. If they could be proven beyond reasonable doubt to have knowingly illegally infringed on the rights of any American, they should do time.

Or at the very least, get recalled from office:

http://www.armedpolitesociety.com/index.php?topic=41586.0

Terry, 230RN
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

Lee

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,181
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2013, 06:44:36 PM »
That's beautiful.

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2013, 09:17:54 PM »
'First thing let's do; let's kill all the >government< lawyers.'
Sorry to go all Shakespearean on youz guyz.  [popcorn]

Speaking of... IIRC, they're STILL looking for whoever it was that bought that Fed. Arms Makarov .380 conversion barrel...  [tinfoil]
I promise not to duck.

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,914
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: Response to the government moving to ban the term "government"
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2013, 09:21:34 AM »
^ ???

Background me, please?
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.