Author Topic: "Montana Carry" passes Senate... and then there were five! (Read 4207 times)

Matthew Carberry · « **on:** April 18, 2011, 08:41:42 PM »

Looks like the must carry proof of training is still in it but it's a win nonetheless.

http://montanahuntingtoday.com/blog/index.php/2011/03/28/permitless-carry-hb-271-passes-senate-second-reading/

Welcome to the family Montanans!

(Montanians? Montanards?)

41magsnub · « **Reply #1 on:** April 18, 2011, 08:44:25 PM »

You had it right the first time.

Score, I was wondering if this passed the Senate or not. The legislative status site has no mention of anything past last week on this bill.

Matthew Carberry · « **Reply #2 on:** April 18, 2011, 08:57:58 PM »

Looks like NH and Utah also have legs on their bills.

If four Con Carry bills pass this year friends, they may think it's a movement...

lee n. field · « **Reply #3 on:** April 18, 2011, 09:30:04 PM »

What we need, is two or three states with this, on Illinois' borders.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #4 on:** April 18, 2011, 11:15:57 PM »

Quote from: lee n. field on April 18, 2011, 09:30:04 PM

What we need, is two or three states with this, on Illinois' borders.

I hope Missouri can help you out with that. How do you think that would affect Illinois?

just Warren · « **Reply #5 on:** April 18, 2011, 11:57:38 PM »

It's almost ConCarry, but still an excellent step.

So if four states do this this year would that be seven total?

stevelyn · « **Reply #6 on:** April 19, 2011, 03:25:20 AM »

I see that you only have to be 18 to carry too. That's better than the other states with Constitutional Carry.

Congrats Montana! I had faith in you all along. And Welcome!

lee n. field · « **Reply #7 on:** April 19, 2011, 08:51:59 AM »

Quote from: The artist formerly known as fistful on April 18, 2011, 11:15:57 PM

I hope Missouri can help you out with that. How do you think that would affect Illinois?

Actually, Chicago would probably blame its problems on you-all.

PTK · « **Reply #8 on:** April 19, 2011, 01:24:24 PM »

Finally. Also, it's been 18+ for carry here in MT for a long time. Plenty of 18 year olds have permits, too, at least from my experience. :)

Matthew Carberry · « **Reply #9 on:** April 19, 2011, 02:07:50 PM »

Need to add that to my list of AK improvements. OC is 16 but CC is 21.

Having you 18 year states in the club should give our pro-gun legislators some ammo. That and the Texas suit.

41magsnub · « **Reply #10 on:** April 19, 2011, 09:56:09 PM »

Does anyone have any confirmation that this got past the senate besides the Montana hunting link? There is nothing in the news and the MT legislature site still has nothing about the Senate hearing.

Edit: I've been digging around and it was not on the Senate agenda yesterday or today, and is not listed for tomorrow.

PTK · « **Reply #11 on:** April 19, 2011, 10:50:13 PM »

41magsnub, I'm finding the same... no word officially save for that one link. Time will tell, but here's hoping, eh? :)

41magsnub · « **Reply #12 on:** April 19, 2011, 11:39:36 PM »

Its official.. False start. 5 yard penalty. Still first down.

The senate schedule only covers through tomorrow morning. It may end up on the schedule tomorrow afternoon. I'm sure it will pass the Senate, they voted on this in pretty much the same form it is in now before the house sent it back to committee.

Matthew Carberry · « **Reply #13 on:** April 20, 2011, 12:17:43 AM »

So was Marbut going on what he was told would happen?

41magsnub · « **Reply #14 on:** April 20, 2011, 12:37:38 PM »

Dunno, the link in the OP however is from the Senate reading of the bill last month on the amendments out of the Judiciary committee before it went back to the house. Following that the house did not like the amendments and it went into committee, the house already voted on the committee report and what we are still waiting on is the senate to vote on the same.

That was supposed to have been voted on Monday based on the last notice I saw, but that has not happened yet.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #15 on:** April 20, 2011, 01:13:29 PM »

I heard that the Senate would only approve if there was a special exemption for Judge-owners. With a gun that good, they don't need training.

PTK · « **Reply #16 on:** April 20, 2011, 04:10:17 PM »

Oh-ho, you're so creative and unique, Fistful.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #17 on:** April 20, 2011, 04:55:56 PM »

I am just as creative and unique as everyone else here.

Matthew Carberry · « **Reply #18 on:** April 20, 2011, 04:58:24 PM »

Quote from: The artist formerly known as fistful on April 20, 2011, 04:55:56 PM

I am just as creative and unique as everyone else here.

No, no you're not.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #19 on:** April 20, 2011, 05:02:26 PM »

You think I'm MORE creative and unique? Awesome.

Matthew Carberry · « **Reply #20 on:** April 20, 2011, 05:02:43 PM »

I just emailed MSSA to get the scoop.

Matthew Carberry · « **Reply #21 on:** April 20, 2011, 05:03:32 PM »

Quote from: The artist formerly known as fistful on April 20, 2011, 05:02:26 PM

You think I'm MORE creative and unique? Awesome.

That is a valid take on what I wrote. Let's just leave it there.

News:

Author Topic: "Montana Carry" passes Senate... and then there were five! (Read 4207 times)