I'm with dogmush - I don't think this premise is true at all.
Bosco has proven to be an abysmal communicator, comically overstates his case, and has repeatedly demonstrated a weak and flawed understanding of what he's claiming deep insight into, but let's steelman Bosco's position for a moment.
It is true that people regularly outsource their decision making to one degree or another through subordinating their own will to an external authority. Some do so based on religion, or a political ideology, or a military hierarchy. He is correct that the people tasked with judging and enforcing the law are going to sometimes - maybe even regularly - make decisions based not on their own careful analysis, but based on the particular rulesets they've chosen to subject themselves to. In fact, we are such creatures of habit that one of the few times we are forced to consciously work through the ethics of a particular decision are when multiple rulesets are in conflict and they don't have an ingrained, pre-calculated response to a situation.
Granted, the above is all solidly within "well, obviously" territory, and is no great insight, but if you squint just right you can sort of work his new revelation into making the above argument.