I didn't jump to an insinuation, I was asking a question. I pointed out that "Star Trek" has pulled that switcheroo before. I recall the STTNG episode where an alien was heterosexual on a homosexual planet and received "Behavior modification" to turn her homosexual.
My response was that being opposed to changing some specific person's biology doesn't mean that they are opposed to changing any person's biology. Your summation didn't exclude that possibility.
Further, you haven't really excluded it yet. Were they opposed to changing her biology because that's wrong per se or were they opposed to changing her biology because she didn't want it?
I'm sorry, I totally misread your post!
The jist I got from it was that they were opposed to parents changing her biology. So, while it could certainly be the second, I felt a parallel with all the SJWs foisting genderbending on children. The crewmember in the courtroom argued that just because their culture said that changing the baby's gender was ok, and that gender was (and I quote) a "defect to be corrected" didn't make it right. (This particular race was all male, reproduced via some sort of single gender egg laying)
They didn't come out and say that one shouldn't be allowed to change gender, but the insinuation that parents shouldn't force (or pressure) their children was strong
In fact I can't recall if they even commented on the first, and the show is decent but not good enough for me to watch a second time
I'm still on the fence. I like it. If they don't get any more than that episode on the "social commentary" scale I'll keep watching.
I still think it's better than discovery although discovery wasn't as bad as I expected