I use it for an overview and then look at the sources. My one attempt at a wiki edit I noticed an armored vehicle being used in an African conflict. Clearly marked with its nation. Wiki article about said crappy tank didn't list that country as an operator. I fixed it with reference links. Rejected. Not woke, think it is more a clubhouse atmosphere where outside editors aren't welcome.
There is some very basic stuff that I will, in general, take wiki's word for. Along the lines of, "Who was the seventeenth President?". It's something that can't be refuted or "curated". But that's it. Wiki is already filling up with stuff like "1619" nonsense, so you can't even count on them for basic, documented history.
I don't care to look, but I'm wondering, under "biology", how many human genders they have listed these days?