Wednesday’s hearing lasted more than eight hours and drew hundreds of prospective witnesses — as many as 3,000, by some estimates. The line to testify stretched from the second-floor committee room down to the front door of the Senate building.
By mid-afternoon, as many as a thousand potential witnesses were being turned away at the door because the building could not house the crowd.
Sen. E.J. Pipkin (R-Dist. 36) of Elkton praised the committee’s handling of the hearing Thursday morning, but said the inability to accommodate everyone who wanted to testify was a “structural failure.”
“Turning away interested citizens in such a manner further fuels cynicism about our legislative process. Next time, they might not come back,” Pipkin said in a statement.
Pipkin said he will offer possible changes to the Senate rules to accommodate large crowds in the future.
Opponents of the governor’s plan also testified to its potential negative economic impact.
Theodore Wojcik, a gunsmith and owner of the Patriot Enterprises in Easton, said the bill likely would put him out of business by outlawing the guns he sells and customizes.
The Beretta U.S.A. Corp., which is based in Accokeek and employs about 400 people, is now facing a ban on its products at a time when it is being courted by other state governments to move their facilities from Maryland, said Jeff Reh, who sits on the company’s board of directors.
“We don’t want to do this,” Reh said. “But obviously this legislation has caused a serious level of concern within our company.”
Provisions in the governor’s bill barring the sale and transport of restricted weapons, which Beretta still could legally sell in other states, also could force the company to move, depending on how the proposed law was interpreted, Reh said.
Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Dist. 27) of Chesapeake Beach has said the governor’s proposal should “absolutely” be broken up into separate pieces so that the measures with broad support would pass.
Miller anticipates vigorous debate on several facets of the bill, particularly over the definition of “assault weapon” and the licensing requirements.
“Why are you fingerprinting someone who hasn’t committed a crime?” Miller said. “These are issues that are going to come up.
Members of the Judicial Proceedings Committee said Thursday it was too early to predict how the panel might alter the bill, but Chairman Brian E. Frosh (D-Dist. 16) of Chevy Chase said there was a compelling case for a ban on assault weapons, a limit on magazine clip size and licensing, which have reduced gun crime elsewhere.
“It’s not like you can take a pill and we’re going to be better,” Frosh said. “But we do know reasonable steps that can be taken to reduce [gun fatalities].”
http://www.gazette.net/article/20130208/NEWS/130209122/0/gazette&template=gazette