Me:
"Just think... your vote may potentially be canceling out a fraudulent vote. Kind of nice to think of it that way, no?"
Thee:
Advocating for playing a rigged game "by the rules" is *expletive deleted*ing retarded.
My intent there was to create motivation for every one of us to get out there and vote and to encourage legal active participation, not only with dollars, but personal activity in whatever you consider to be a conservative "party" or "movement" or "Church" or "motorcycle club."
I hope you did not misunderstand that.
Besides, forum rules make it impossible to recommend any illegal actions to throw an election "our " way.
I know, I know, we all celebrate the Boston Tea Party, but as successful as it might have been, it was probably illegal as all get out.
So to use our color printers with properly sized weighted paper run by squads of party devotees to duplicate hundreds of faux absentee and mail-in ballots after hours and stored in vans to be brought to light at the appropriate times is not to be recommended.
Nor is it recommended to bribe, cajole, or wheedle the complicit printer of those ballots to run off a couple of thousand in a "test run" and discard them carefully in a nice clean dumpster at an appropriate time.
Not recommended by me, anyway.
Terry, 230RN
PS. I have a little tautology about the alleged voter fraud which goes:
------------------------------------
On "proof" with respect to the voter fraud allegations:
"There is no proof."
Of course not.
1.There is no proof without evidence.
2. There is no evidence without investigation.
3. There is no investigation without suspicion.
4. But suspicion without proof is paranoia, so shut up, you paranoid conservative.
Get my drift? They wrapped all that up in a nice little package for us, didn't they?
------------------------------------