When talking about the defensive gun use number from 1995, they talk a lot about unreliable data and surveys, but they don't say that when it comes to the Harvard research, no do they mention the numbers at all. And the Harvard research is based on a survey rather than FBI crime statistics.
They also can't seem to grasp that most defensive gun uses don't involve someone getting shot or even a discharge of the weapon. They complain that there weren't 2.5 million gun shot wounds. In the same article they talk about most people couldn't handle properly using a gun in self defense yet they assume that someone would be shot in EVERY SINGLE DGU.
As usual, they are throwing a bunch of random anti-gun thought on the paper and hoping people won't dig further or realize how weak their argument is.