Not even a SECTION of the article is about the illuminati.
The movement to establish a global system of control began somewhere back in the murky past of the Illuminati (1776) and has since morphed, grown and expanded till now there are numerous shadowy variants and groups that make it almost impossible to pin down exactly who is running things and where the real motive and power is coming from. Fortunately, it is not necessary to know all of the secrets underlying this movement. It is sufficient to establish that all of the existing globalist organizations--the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Aspen Institute, Bilderburgers, Royal Institute for International Affairs, Committee of 300, Club of Rome, etc., aspire to global control and eliminate national sovereignty. Numerous quotations of their own leaders and members state just that. That they have more sinister long-term motives and intentions concerning the eventual use of global control is not so clear or easy to prove. However, the track record of global intervention does not portend an optimistic outcome.
I didnt say the article was ABOUT the illuminati, nor did i even say that there was a section dedicated to such. What I actually stated was that this was the point that the article got to be amusingly crazy.
Just in case your attention span doesnt permit you to to scroll between two posts let me show it to you again
So here is what you do to save time. Do a page search for the word "Illuminati", dont worry, it will be there and it will teleport you straight to the craziest bits.
I assumed that a person capable of dressing themselves in the morning would be able to understand this concept, however I forgot to consider the invention of velcro. I also neglected to consider that people dont actually need to dress or be free of prodigious chin-drooling to access the internet.
With regards to Mike Irwins reading comprehension, you might actually want to *READ* his first post, and then try *really really* hard to understand the meaning of the phrase "under the radar".
For those playing the home game let me just point out the amusing interplay of events from that particular segment of this discussion:
Mike:
My Brotherhood of Zionism has fallen below the radar again.
MA:
Mike is your computer working ok or is it just you? Nowhere in Joel's article is the phrase "the Committee of Zion," or "the Zion Brotherhood," or "the Protocols of Zion," let alone "specifically pointing them out."
Whatever you do PLEASE do not stop posting, this place would be very slow and only mildly amusing in your absence.
